Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing spoke at an IPS conference last Friday (26 Oct) telling Singaporeans not to be anti-excellence, but anti-elitism.

He said that Singaporeans should look past a person’s income or status, and that the successful ones in society have a responsibility to give back to society as well as be volunteers to help the underprivileged.

At one point, he asked a rhetorical question, “So, since I am now a minister, I presume that qualifies me as a member of the elite?”

“There is a difference between anti-elitism and anti-excellence,” he said.

“I would not hold it against somebody, regardless of his background, if he does well and makes a contribution to society. But if someone has done well, not through his own effort but maybe through his connections… and doesn’t reach out to people, then that is different.”

Pathetic Workfare Income Supplement and Silver Support Scheme

In response to what Chan said, Ex-GIC Chief Economist Yeoh Lam Keong wrote on his Facebook page yesterday (1 Nov) criticising Chan for talking with “sophistry”.

“If our top leadership are really so keen for elites to help the underprivileged in society and create more equality of opportunity why is it our basic income policy support for the absolute poor is still so pathetic?” Mr Yeoh pointed out.

“We can well afford to raise the Workfare Income Supplement and Silver Support Scheme by $600 a month to meet most of the basic needs of the bulk of those that do not earn enough to do so, yet policy makers stubbornly refuse to adequately fund these two schemes that between them automatically reach most of these working and elderly absolute poor.”

Indeed, the Silver Support Scheme which targets the bottom 20% of Singaporeans aged 65 and above, only dishes out several hundreds of dollars to the elderly poor every quarter. For example, those who live in HDB 3-room flats and are able to meet the criteria of Silver Support Scheme, they would receive only $600 per quarter or $200 per month.

Mr Yeoh calculated that even raising Workfare Income Supplement and Silver Support Scheme by $600 a month, it would only cost the government less than 1% of GDP and require no rise in taxes. Also, most studies also show that extending these schemes will not reduce work effort or motivation and, in fact, would greatly increase the ability of the poor to help themselves.

Excessive immigration policy blamed for creating huge class of working poor in Singapore

Mr Yeoh further shared that it was the government’s excessive immigration policy that has created a huge class of working poor in Singapore. He said, “And it was our misguided policy of excessive immigration over the 1990s and between 2000-2010 that depressed wages and created a huge class of working poor who form the bulk of our 300-400,000 absolute poor in Singapore.”

“Rather than all this sophisticated talk on how elites should give back to the less privileged or be less conscious of socioeconomic status, how about some concrete and effective policy action to put our money where our mouth is and largely eradicate the scourge and shame of absolute poverty in Singapore?” Mr Yeoh asked.

And coming back to Chan, Mr Yeoh has this to say about him, “Minister Chan who is a smart, personable and generally well meaning leader was in charge of the relevant Ministry – MSF and MCCY for over 3 years and was also Secretary General of NTUC for nearly 3 years. With all due respect, If he didn’t or couldn’t do anything substantial enough to sufficiently help the poorest of the poor in all those years of relevant high office that had the most responsibility and say in such matters, which of our elite policy makers can or will?”

“For our governing elites, true intelligent charity and compassion should should begin with a deep policy mindset change and social policy reform at home. Otherwise, all this kind of talk is just empty sophistry,” he advised Chan.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

父亲疑遭威胁推伤 儿子找脚车骑士“理论”

父亲在开车时遭一名男脚车骑士故意撞击,两人随后引起冲突,男骑士还推了父亲一下,导致父亲肩膀肌腱撕裂,儿子非常不忿地找骑士“理论”,并将理论过程录制后上传到脸书上,引起网上一片哗然。 有关的视频是由本地歌手林昱志,于本月6日在其署名Leon Lim Yu Zhi的脸书页面传开。 1分钟多的视频中只见身穿黑色运动紧身服的男脚车骑士,面对林昱志的声讨,数度尝试打断都不成功。只是当林昱志询问对方名字时,他转身不愿回应。 林昱志在帖文中指出,其父亲当时在路上行驶,车速很慢,并且让出足够的空间给脚车骑士通过,但是却遭对方撞击并扬长而去。 他指出,当他们趋前理论、要求对方为自己的行为解释时,男骑士就将脚车丢在草坪上,要求对方下车以武力解决。“你知道我是谁吗?我是英国军官,我会杀了你。” 他表示该名男骑士过后还推了父亲一下。 指父亲被诊断肩膀受伤 林昱志于周日(8日)更新帖文指出,其父亲曾瞒着他表示肩膀痛,后来到医院被诊断肩膀受伤了,疑出现“肌腱撕裂”(Supraspinatus Tear),交付了120元的医药费。…

李显扬脸书晒妻子林学芬自制手提包 网友拿总理夫人作比较

总理李显龙胞弟李显扬前日(10日)在脸书上炫耀妻子林学芬的自制手提包,网民除了赞叹林学芬的手艺,也将她与李显龙妻子何晶作比较。 李显扬在脸书上转贴了来自新加坡工艺品商店2Quilters的帖文,该帖文也展示了林学芬自制手袋的照片。 李显扬也在帖文内表示,“我妻子刚完成的自制手袋已放上2Quilters 网站。” 而2Quilters在帖文内也描述了林学芬如何使用完成自制手袋,并赞叹她完成自制手袋的速度令人惊人。 据林学芬表示,该自制手袋的类型也是首次尝试,虽然看似复杂,但实际操作并没有想象中困难。 帖文贴出后,获得许多网友夸赞,但部分网友也很快将她与李显龙之妻何晶比较,认为比起何晶在脸书上贴出“令人厌烦”的帖文,林学芬更是显得更多才多艺。 网友Jerry Liew : 比起何晶所提的包包,你的更有模有样。你的是优雅(classy),何晶的是 C等外加糟糕…

Why no historian on Founders’ Memorial committee?

Historically important monument but no historians on committee The composition of the…

WP’s Kenneth Foo voices concern over technology gaps among senior citizens, calls for “friendly options” made available

The Workers’ Party (WP) member Kenneth Foo Seck Guan took to his…