Low angle view of public housing HDB resident buildings/ flats complex with grass courtyard, trees and dense of apartments during sunset in Singapore. Urban concept. Panorama style from Shutterstock.com

The Housing Development Board (HDB) reported on Mon (22 Oct) that it had incurred an overall deficit of $1.7 billion in the last FY.

In 2013, then National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan explained that HDB actually has to pay the government for land to build HDB flats. He said the price of land is tied to acquisition costs, reclamation and the building of infrastructure around it.

“You need to acquire a piece of land; you need to reclaim a piece of land. All those costs money to taxpayers and we are just trustees of taxpayers and those costs are to be accounted for. And even when you have got that land prepared, land is only valuable when we invest in infrastructure, roads, MRT… And all those costs billions of dollars,” he said.

“Every year, hundreds of millions of dollars of losses were incurred by the HDB and that’s why MOF (Ministry of Finance) has to give the HDB an annual grant, otherwise the HDB will be in the red. It cannot be forever in the red, because there’s no way it can make money. Because every unit that we sell, we lose money, HDB loses money. The accounting for the HDB is deficit accounting. So if you incur a S$300-million loss, there is a grant of S$300 million that covers it. That is how we operate the HDB.”

“Let us not perpetuate this talk about HDB is making money out of building houses because if it was so simple, life would be straightforward, but that’s not the case,” he added. “The cost of building HDB flats includes the cost of land, design, construction, financing and other project-related costs. It varies from project to project and year to year.”

Govt as a whole does make money from HDB sales

HDB itself may be losing money but in actual fact, the government as a whole does make money. Let’s look at a specific example.

In Feb this year, HDB launched Tampines GreenDew comprised of four 15-storey residential blocks with 726 units of 3, 4, and 5-room flats. It also launched Tampines GreenFoliage comprised of four blocks with 542 units of 4 and 5-room flats. In total, 1,268 units were offered at Tampines in the Feb launch.

The 1,268 units were priced as follows:

Taking the average price of $219,500 for the 84 3-room flats, $324,500 for the 644 4-room flats and $448,500 for the 540 5-room flats, total revenue to HDB would amount to: $219,500 x 84 + $324,500 x 644 + $448,500 x 540 = $469,606,000.

The construction of the flats was later awarded to 2 companies through open tenders. Tampines GreenDew (726 units) was awarded to Prelim Construction Pte Ltd at $96,500,000 while Tampines GreenFoliage (542 units) was awarded to Ho Lee Construction Pte Ltd at $76,300,000. The construction also includes a multi-storey carpark with roof garden and other precinct structures like linkways, linkbridges, pavilions, trellis and shelters.

Therefore, the total construction cost for the 1,268 Tampines units, together with the associated precinct structures works out to be $172,800,000 or $136,278 per unit on average.

Hence, considering HDB as part of government, the government would have made: $496,606,000 – $172,800,000 = $323,806,000. Of course, this amount would include the infrastructure cost and, supposedly, the land cost too. But the infrastructure cost would only be a fraction of the $323,806,000. To calculate exactly how much the government made would then depend on the actual acquisition cost of the land by the government. Some were state land, to begin with. Others were compulsorily acquired from private entities at very low cost under the Land Acquisition Act many years ago.

For example, Bishan HDB estate was built from cemetery land forcefully acquired by the government at around 1980. The cemetery land originally belonged to Kwong Wai Siew Peck San Theng temple. In the end, the government only paid a compensation of $4.95 million to the temple for the 121-hectare (13,024,319 sqf) of cemetery land or about $0.38 psf.

So, with a low land cost incurred by the govt to begin with and later the govt marking up the land for sale at the current market price to the public, why would the government make losses in sale of HDB flats?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

HDB to upgrade 230,000 flats with more contemporary and better quality fittings

Residents whose Housing Development Board (HDB) flats are eligible for upgrading under…

Indian nationals ask their govt to hold talks with SG to allow them to enter SG soon

Unable to get back to Singapore quickly, Indian nationals are now petitioning…

$100 million worth of GST vouchers to be given to 800,000 eligible households

About 800,000 Singaporean HDB households will receive $100 million worth of GST…

选举大事不应等闲视之 民主党:更公平竞选模式下,才有最强力委托

副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰前日声称,尽早举行大选,就能尽早把人民凝聚起来,应对当前挑战和未来的不确定因素。 对此民主党认为,尽管疫情还在持续,遗憾的是行动党仍有意要在这当儿举行选举,似乎把选举视为需要去“解决”掉的麻烦事,而不是举国参与决策未来的关键时刻,这是很危险的。 民主党称,目前仍有许多深远和严肃的议题待深究,更需要国人去参与那些关乎他们生计和孩子们将来的事务。 对此,该党呼吁行动党应舍弃以往的选举模式,特别是不仅仅是九天的竞选时间,反之应延长至21天。 在疫情下群众集会可能无法召开,这也让反对党处在相对不利的劣势。 民主党认为,要让选举有更实质的意义,理应让竞选的政党有平等的机会接触选民,让选民能熟悉各政党的政策倡议和政见要点。 这也包括允许各党能每晚都能登上全国性的亚洲新闻台频道、广播、主流媒体等,以及允许政党在熟食中心、组屋底层等公共空间发表演说。 “陈振声部长说行动党寻求强力委托。但有力的委托来自于,选民有足够的时间和机会,接触各政党平台和政见。那么国人去投票前,才能有足够的认知,针对国家未来走向作出明智的选择。” 该党也指,在行动党掌控大众媒体下的备受掣肘的竞选活动,加之近年来各种立法压缩网络空间,这反而让行动党可能赢得令人质疑的委托。      …