Last Thursday (11 OCT), a member of the public, Mr Lee Chee Meng, wrote to ST Forum complaining that NTUC Foodfare does not give patrons much choice for the subsidized meals. NTUC Foodfare gives special discounts to Singaporeans who are on Comcare or are concessionary cardholders, such as senior citizens or NTUC union members.

Mr Lee wrote, “When Rice Garden was set up, senior citizens and NTUC union members could buy a $2 meal that included two vegetables and one meat item. My non-vegetarian choice was normally sardine.”

“However, now the same $2 meal is restricted to two vegetables and pork, stewed chicken or curry chicken,” he revealed. “There is no variety in our meals with such a restriction.”

“I know of commercial operators selling three items without any constraints on what customers can choose from the menu. If they can operate profitably, I don’t see why Rice Garden cannot do so. I thought being a social enterprise implied that the main objective is not to make substantial profits,” he added.

NTUC Foodfare responds

Replying to Mr Lee on ST Forum today (16 Oct), the General Manager of the Institutional Catering Division of NTUC Foodfare, Koh Kian Leong, defended NTUC.

Koh started by saying that NTUC’s Rice Garden is a community meal programme which was started in 2009, to “provide affordable, nutritious cooked food, in particular, to the lower income group”.

“We would like to clarify that subsidised customers and customers paying the full price are offered the same variety of dishes of up to 13 vegetable and meat dishes (depending on stall size),” he said. “The whole range of dishes on offer is available to all customers, regardless of whether they are entitled to subsidies or not.”

But Koh also said, “However, to offer greater variety to those who are less budget-conscious, we also offer certain dishes which are priced higher such as fish or chicken drumstick.”

“If a customer, regardless of whether he is paying the full or subsidised price, chooses to purchase these dishes, then he will have to pay a higher price for the meal,” he added.

“We are committed to ensuring that everyone is able to enjoy a wholesome and nutritious meal at an affordable price at Rice Garden.”

In other words, Mr Lee was right to point out that subsidized meals for Comcare or concessionary cardholders do not include certain dishes like fish or chicken drumstick.

It’s not known why fish is priced higher by NTUC, since one of their labour MPs, Halimah Yacob, who is now the President of Singapore, once told the media, “For example, the price of chicken may be rising fast, but we can encourage Singaporeans to turn to alternative sources of protein, such as fish.”

She was implying that fish is cheaper than chicken.

In any case, Mr Lee is not talking about Soon Hock or garoupa. He just wanted to eat canned sardine but yet, NTUC Foodfare deemed any kind of fish dishes to be of higher prices.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

迪哥达挑战诽谤指控有违宪法 申请移交高庭审理遭驳回

因为一篇刊载在《网络公民》的文章,在2018年12月被控刑事诽谤的35岁男子迪哥达(Daniel de Costa),向国家法院申诉,要求将他的指控交给高庭审理,以审视上述指控是否有违宪法。 迪哥达律师拉维(M Ravi)认为,即便总理弟妹李显扬和李玮玲,都曾对总理以及其内阁,作出相似乃至更严重的指控。 故此,拉维认为如果总理弟妹作出类似乃至更严重的指控且未被起诉,那么就不应起诉迪哥达。 拉维是在去年12月11日申请,要求将迪哥达的刑事诽谤案交给高庭审理,并探讨对迪哥达的起诉,是否抵触新加坡宪法第12(1)条(法律面前人人平等)。他也指触及对宪法的解读,国家法院没有足够权限审理。 然而,在昨日(20日)的审讯,国家法院法官认为,辩方未提出新的法律问题,也没有初步证据可佐证,对迪哥达的指控存有偏见。故此驳回迪哥达的申请。 法官指高庭法官曾在先例提及,任何国家法院审理案件,若过程中出现明确法律问题,而只有当有关法律问题不曾为高庭处理、或具有严重争议,才有必要移交高庭诠释。 对于宪法12(1条),控方则提及2012年毒犯Ramalingam Ravinthran的裁决先例,已有详细解读。 对此拉维将在下周向高庭提刑事动议。…

裕盛路第14座组屋社区逢雨积水 公用局提供解决方案

本月初,人民党主席乔立盟在社交媒体反映,裕盛路第14座组屋有逢豪雨就积水的问题,且“困扰该区居民常达10年”。 他提醒相关市镇会,应透过更好的雨水处理机制改善问题,例如拓宽沟渠、加快排水等等。“我们理应能为居民做得更好。” 据了解,上述区域尽管是波东巴西单选区范围,却是由惹兰勿刹市镇会所管辖。 根据乔立盟在今日(26日)更新的帖文,公用事业局(PUB)已针对积水问题,提供建屋发展局和惹兰勿刹市镇会改善的建议,提出工程解决方案。 乔立盟相信,排水改善工程能如期落实,有望彻底解决排水的问题,也感谢主动带出问题并致函给公用事业局的居民。

Ex-SMRT engineer speaks out about the frequent breakdowns

Singapore’s Mass Raid Transit (MRT) network experienced its largest disruption on 7…

It is not in the interest of the public that AGC should contemplate any action against M Ravi

by Teo Soh Lung I am disappointed that the AGC has issued…