Chicken in poultry farm from

The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS)  has issued an Infringement Decision (“ID”) against 13 fresh chicken distributors and imposed financial penalties totalling $26.9 million for engaging in anti-competitive agreements to coordinate the amount and timing of price increases, and agreeing not to compete for each other’s customers in the market for the supply of fresh chicken products in Singapore.

It said that fresh chicken distributors import live chickens from farms in Malaysia and slaughter them in Singapore. Thereafter, the distributors sell the fresh chicken products to customers such as supermarkets, restaurants, hotels, wet market stalls and hawker stalls.

“These products include whole fresh chickens, chicken parts and processed chickens,” it noted.

According to the commission, chicken is the most consumed meat in Singapore – more than 30 kg of chicken is consumed per person annually. This is significantly higher than the 1 kg to 20 kg consumed per person annually for other types of meats such as fish, pork, beef and mutton.

In 2016, approximately 49 million live chickens were slaughtered in Singapore. The total turnover of the parties, who collectively supply more than 90% of fresh chicken products in Singapore, amounts to approximately half a billion dollars annually.

In March 2014, CCCS said that it commenced its investigations into the fresh chicken distribution industry after it received information from a secret complainant.

Its investigations revealed that, from at least September 2007 to August 2014, the Parties had engaged in discussions on prices and had also expressly coordinated the amount and timing of price increases of certain fresh chicken products sold in Singapore. During these discussions, the Parties had also agreed to not compete for each other’s customers (i.e., market sharing).

The parties’ collusion restricted competition in the market and likely contributed to price increases of certain fresh chicken products in Singapore. By agreeing not to compete for each other’s customers, the Parties restricted the choices available to customers. The coordinated price increases further reduced customer choice as it limited options for customers to switch to more competitive distributors.

CCCS then said that in view of the high combined market shares of the parties, and as chicken is the most commonly consumed meat in Singapore, the parties’ anti-competitive conduct impacted a large number of customers including supermarkets, restaurants, hotels, wet market stalls and hawker stalls, and ultimately, end-consumers of these fresh chicken products.

On 8 March 2016, CCCS issued a Proposed Infringement Decision (PID) against the parties. During the course of written and oral representations by the Parties to the PID, further information was provided to CCCS of the Parties’ participation in price discussions and co-ordination of price increases.

On 27 September 2016, CCCS notified the Parties that further investigations would be conducted. Subsequently, CCCS received applications by some of the parties for lenient treatment under CCCS’s leniency programme.

Later on 21 December 2017, CCCS issued a supplementary PID against the Parties and received further written and oral representations. CCCS carefully considered all the representations in reaching its findings.

In levying the financial penalties, CCCS stressed that it takes into account the relevant turnovers of the Parties, the nature, duration and seriousness of the infringement, aggravating and mitigating factors (such as whether a party had co-operated with CCCS), as well as representations made by the parties.

Particularly for this case, it noted that the large size of the industry, the high market shares of the Parties, the seriousness and the long duration (of about seven years) of the cartel conduct contributed to CCCS imposing the highest total financial penalty in a single case to date.

CCCS said that it has imposed the following financial penalties on the Parties (penalties for entities within the same group are shown as a combined figure):

Aside from financial penalties, CCCS noted that it has directed the Parties to provide a written undertaking that they will refrain from using The Poultry Merchants’ Association, Singapore, of which all the Parties are members, or any other industry association as a platform or front, for anti-competitive activities.

Mr. Toh Han Li, Chief Executive, CCCS said, “Price-fixing and market sharing are considered some of the most harmful types of anti-competitive conduct. Such conduct is particularly harmful when the products affected are widely consumed in Singapore, such as in this case. CCCS will continue to take strong enforcement action to ensure that cartels do not negatively impact Singapore markets and harm businesses and consumers.”

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Metal panel of escalator at City Hall MRT dislodged and wounded 39-yr-old woman

A 39-year-old woman was wounded by a dislodged metal panel of SMRT…

公路上“飞来横祸”! 铁管飞出击中女子肩膀

女子在高速公路骑着摩托车,不料飞来横祸,疑似遭一辆货车上掉落的铁管击中肩膀,导致他血流不止,到医院治疗缝了12针。 网友Ismawati Ali 11日在脸书上发文讲述自己的可怕经历,她表示该事件发生于9日傍晚6点45分左右,位于前往大士方向,靠近卓源路(Toh Guan Road)出口处的泛岛高速公路路段。 她忆述,当时她正前往蔡厝港的路上,途中却遭一条约一米长的铁管从前方货车掉落。 当时,她正在第一条车道上行驶,而货车则是在中间的车道,突然间,她看到有东西飞出来,原来是车上运载的铁管。 在情急之下,她立刻闪躲,深怕击中自己的头部或脸部,但不幸的是,尽管她当下已经意识要闪躲,仍被铁管击中肩膀,由于当时交通繁忙,并来不及转弯逃避,因此肩膀才会受伤。 “我很幸运的是,摩托车并没有失控,不然我可能会当场丧命,或被其他车辆撞到。” Ismawati 接着表示,当时因为货车后方仍有一辆轿车挡住视线,让他无法确认货车的车牌,但她也认得货车的特征,即车上装有一个灰色的桶,但司机当时并没有使用网来固定里头的产品。…

Grassroot leader with PBM accused of being ineffective

By TR Emeritus In the Straits Times today (15 Oct), Geylang Serai…

S’pore flag left on the ground, how many will pick it up?

In a social experiment to see how Singaporeans and the public would…