Writing for ST today (24 Jul), Dr Parag Khanna who is said to be a “leading global strategy advisor, world traveler, and best-selling author”, as well as the Founder & Managing Partner of his own advisory firm FutureMap, he argued that openness to talent is vital to Singapore’s ambition to become a Smart Nation.

That requires a more holistic view of immigration that recognises a shared patriotism between local and imported talent, he said.

In his article, he opined that even though Singapore’s students are world-beaters in math, science, reading and problem-solving, the number is insufficient to “staff all the roles Singapore plays as a global economic hub”.

“Singapore has always remained open to the most qualified professionals and should continue to attract those who contribute to its commercial strength, and invest in hiring, training and elevating Singaporeans,” he wrote.

However, he also noted that the move to slow down immigration in recent years has “damaged Singaporean businesses that depend on foreign labour”. He named businesses like hospitality, food and beverage, healthcare and others.

“Hotels need more cleaners, restaurants need more waiters, and hospitals need more doctors and nurses,” he added. “The service sector clearly cannot be automated by robots as quickly as portrayed in sci-fi movies.”

India set to overtake China in population size

He thinks that the next generation of Singaporeans should “reflect Asia’s changing economic and social complexion”.

In this regard, he said, “It has been an article of faith that Singapore has maintained a particular racial balance that is three-quarters Chinese.”

“But should this be an iron-clad principle adhered to rigidly or can there be alterations in the demographic mix?” he asked.

“After all, of Asia’s nearly 5 billion residents, 3.5 billion are not Chinese, with India alone set to overtake China in population size in the coming decade and most Asian countries having younger median age population as well.”

While acknowledging that Singapore “will continue to be majority-Chinese long into the future”, Dr Khanna advocates that Singapore should be allowed to “grow in the other directions shaping Asia’s future”.

He also argued for a flexible entrepreneur visa programme that gives foreigners 4 to 5 years to establish themselves in Singapore. The programme could also be a “pathway to permanent residency and citizenship”, he said.

Dr Khanna: Singapore can fit 8 million people or more by 2030

Dr Khanna is no stranger to controversy. In Nov 2013, right after the public protest against the 6.9 million Population White Paper erupted, he spoke at the Straits Times Global Outlook Forum telling everyone that Singapore can, in fact, fit 8 million or more people by 2030.

“There is a much more physically devolved Singapore in which the towns play a much stronger role, in which there’s much more local economic activity and vibrancy, in which everyone is not cramping down into Orchard or CBD every single day. And that Singapore can most certainly accommodate a couple million more people.”

And in a follow-up interview the next month in Dec 2013, he continued to advocate having a population of 8 million or more in Singapore. His point, he said, was that “the Singapore of 2030 is not the same as the Singapore of today”.

“It’s not the same technologically, culturally, demographically. So people who revolt at the number, they’re not taking into account these changes, and the broader strategic economic context of a very open economy in a competitive world,” he said.

Looking at the Government’s future plans, Singapore will be highly decentralised, with people working in the same place they live, rather than travelling downtown. He cited the future development of Tampines, Jurong West and Woodlands as examples. “It is a city that could accommodate more people without congestion, if it’s done right,” he said.

At the time, many netizens, understandably, were unhappy with his proposal of 8 million or more, and attacked him online. He merely replied that some people “are not learning from these conversations”. “They need to care more and debate more, and not attack more every time they hear a number like eight million,” he said.

When the journalist pointed out that the Government was addressing public unhappiness about the 6.9 million figure, Dr Khanna replied, “That was their (Govt’s) mistake. I have no sympathy for that.”

While he strongly believes in public consultation, “I do not believe that it’s the job of a government to perpetually react to whatever (public’s) sentiments and whims that are emerging and then be handicapped in making strategy by those whims”.

“Governments which do that (will) fail,” he added.

Over-rated thinker

On his personal website, Dr Khanna listed himself as the Founder & Managing Partner of FutureMap, a data and scenario based strategic advisory firm. He described himself as “the international bestselling author of six books, has traveled to most of the countries of the world, and holds a PhD from the London School of Economics”.

However, The New Republic founded in 1914 as a journal of opinion which champions progressive ideas and challenges popular opinion, considers Dr Khanna as one of the most “over-rated thinkers”. This is what it said about Dr Khanna:

Parag Khanna’s online bio is the Platonic ideal of puffed-up nonsense. Khanna is described as a “leading geo-strategist,” “an accomplished adventurer,” and “an active and advanced tennis player.”

We further learn that he speaks five foreign languages, has traveled in more than 100 countries, and “has climbed numerous 20,000-foot plus peaks.” What’s more, he’s “a frequent speaker at international conferences” who briefs “corporations on global trends, systemic risks and emerging market strategies.” He has hosted an MTV show, was the first video blogger at ForeignPolicy.com, and directs something called the “Hybrid Reality Institute.”

His recent book is actually called How to Run the World. It is a self-congratulatory anthology of clichés and platitudes—the life of the mind, Davos-style.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“社媒不应只炫耀富裕和成功” 知名主持人坦然叙述家人疫情下挑战

“我爸不再工作,我哥正艰难地寻找工作,我妹转换职业,而我正在(就业)的十字路口。” 本地知名活动主持人Matthew Zachary Liu(以下译名刘马修),本月4日在脸书上发文,分享自家家庭因疫情所受到的影响,尽管他的家庭是小康之家,不算富裕也不缺任何物质,但如今家人都在挣扎生存,工作也变得相当不稳定,使家庭面临了一些挑战。 刘马修认为,与其在社交媒体上向其他人炫耀自己更富裕更舒适的成功,他反而想要刻画出更真实,更贴近现今生活的帖文,让如今经历痛苦的人能够从中受到启发,给予人们力量,一同度过疫情。 刘马修最后也指出,“我们都在往不同的方向走去,经历不同的困难。有时候会感到相当失望,不过无论什么东西或病毒砸向我们,我们必须定时在内心深处不停挖掘勇气,让我们勇敢度过,即使已经达到极限,或者太脆弱无法跨过,总会有人给我们力量,帮助我们度过。” “从小到大,我从未真正担心过任何经济问题,但长大后,我才意识到爸爸这些年默默地为家庭所付出的辛苦。” 刘马修的工作为一名活动主持人,受到疫情的影响,他的收入也减少了30巴仙,与此同时,父亲也进入退休年龄,在疫情之际退休。 谈及父亲,刘马修表示父亲作为公务员工作了40余年,一直都仰赖这份工作养家糊口,公务员被视为“铁饭碗”,他也庆幸他们家并不需要担忧财务,但近期父亲因被迫退休,才让他真正意识到父亲一直以来,默默为家庭付出。 “父亲在早年因为一些情况被迫提早进入社会,以至于他无法享受最好的教育机会。但在职场需要比其他有文凭的人更加努力证明自己,也让他花了比一般人更长的时间才获得晋升机会。” 他指出,父亲其中一个愿望是希望三个孩子都能够接受大学教育,获得更好的未来,而且他在辛苦工作的同时,仍需为家人操心,提供所需,最终孩子们也如他所愿,在他供给下完成大学教育。 父亲在疫情下退休…

Reduced frequency of cleaning due to shortage of cleaners, says NEA

On Monday (23 March), Director of the Department of Public Cleanliness at…

人力部要求民主党依循程序 申请撤回更正指示

民主党昨日发声明,抨击人力部指控该党发布虚假事实,要求人力部长杨莉明道歉,并坚称该党的相关声明乃是事实。 对此,人力部发言人告知媒体,目前仍未接到民主党提出的要求撤回指示的申请,并要求该党依循《防假消息法》下的程序提出申请。 人力部也指民主党已被知会有关程序。 在《防假消息法》下,若相关人士不满部长的更正指示,可向相关发出指示的部长提出上诉。包括可在www.pofmaoffice.gov.sg,填写表格,挑战相关部长/下指示机构的指示。 而根据条规的14(1)项,相关部长/机构,则必须在两个工作日内对上诉作出决定。 不过,在14(3)项也提到,如果部长未回复,即代表有关上诉申请已被驳回。 如果申请被部长驳回,还可以上诉到高等法院。 上月14日,人力部透过《防假消息法》办事处,援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),针对民主党的脸书贴文和文章,发出要求更正指示。 人力部反驳本地PMET的就业率自2015年实则逐步增长;且并没有出现本地PMET裁员增加的趋势。 民主党则指出,该党文章指的是“失业”( “unemployment”),却被人力部误植为“裁员”(”retrenchment”),张冠李戴,该党却为此被人力部指控发布“虚假事实”。 民主党秘书长徐顺全也在脸书强调,国人面对的职场不确定环境和裁员问题是真实和迫切的,“否认问题存在只会拖延寻找解决方案。”