Photo from Ministry of Education

Social and Family Development Minister Desmond Lee stated on Sunday (1 July) that the Early Childhood Development Agency (ECDA) will be reviewing its preschool subsidy framework.

Under the current framework, eligible households can receive up to S$740 in childcare subsidies per month. The amount a family receives depends on their household income.

The framework saw an increase of at least S$100 in childcare subsidies when last reviewed in 2013.

Mr Lee told reporters on the sidelines of a visit to a community health and developmental screening event at Boon Lay that the review will help to ensure that quality preschools remain accessible and affordable to families with young children.

He also interacted with families and volunteers during his visit which was jointly organised by ECDA and the Neighbourhood Health Service Kids (NHS Kids), the event offered a free, one-stop health screening to about 300 children in the area, including those under the KidSTART pilot.

The framework is part of a two-year programme by NHS Kids, funded by Temasek Foundation Cares, to support children and families who require assistance in the areas of child development, health and social care.

There were about 400 medical, nursing and social work students from local tertiary institutions have volunteered to provide the screening services, supported by staff from healthcare and social service agencies.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SMRT: Effective crisis management?

by: Shanta Arul/ In a horrific accident in April, Thai teenager Nitcharee…

恶劣工程! 座椅脱落致年长者跌破头

德义阁小贩中心经过2个月的翻新工程后,才开放两天,其设施就导致一名年长者自座位上跌倒,破了头。 一名网友Tan Paul在昨天半夜上载了一张照片,照片中只见一名穿着格子T恤的年长者坐在地上,其身旁站着一名男子,拿着类似手帕之物帮年长者的头部止血。年长者的对面还蹲着一名男子,似乎在帮忙做记录。 照片上留言道,“经过两个月的装修,就在今天,看看发生了什么,这个可怜的老人家自座位上跌下来了!!” 网友表示,因为椅子的圆形座椅与主体结构突然脱落,导致年长者跌倒受伤。 他质疑是因为椅子的做工恶劣,才导致意外发生。 网民:不该对恶劣工程妥协 此帖文一经上载,立刻引起60人的回应、70条评论和535人转发。评论中,网民的严厉批评不断。 一网友Kelvin Lau也同意Paul的看法,并上载了肇事椅子的照片,指有关的翻新工作不仔细。 网民表示,有关的翻新承包商仅仅将座椅粘在主体上,非常不能接受。 网民表示,绝不能对类似马虎工作妥协,为什么不将座椅锁上。他们希望老人家尽快康复之外,也呼吁当局关注和彻查有关事件,要求赔偿老人家。…

高庭驳回迪哥达索取警方录供的刑事动议

本月3日,大法官梅达顺在高庭驳回了本社总编许渊臣,以及被控刑事诽谤男子迪哥达的刑事动议。 检控官拒绝公开两人此案中的警方录供,他们个别针对此事提呈刑事动议。 不过,梅达顺在口头陈述判决依据时表明,提呈在他眼前的凭据,未能说服他要求高庭审核国家法院裁决的最高门槛已达到。 早前,迪哥达辩护律师拉维,依循刑事诉讼法(CPC)第22条文,要求控方在开审前出示迪哥达的口供,但遭国家法院法官驳回。 至于许渊臣辩护律师朱正熙,强调许渊臣此前录的口供,能力助此案,因为当时当局并没有盘问被告,确认他是否有诽谤内阁的意图,以及他是否认为文章陈述是中立或不利的。 梅达顺则认为,辩方大可在上诉时提及此事,惟朱正熙也指出有凸显程序错误的重要;梅达顺也提醒检控官,考量有关口供是否和辩方有关联。 拉维律师则提及,早在开审前,检控官就已知道被告索取有关口供,但当时对方就已拒绝。可是控方仍辩解被告可走刑事案件披露会议(Criminal Case Disclosure Conference,简称CCDC)程序,但依据《刑事诉讼法》第159条文,却需要征得控辩双方同意。 一开始控方就拒绝让被告索取口供,对此拉维更形容控方的上述建议,形同让被告做“徒劳之举”(原文:go on…

Yale-NUS merger aligns with gov’t push for interdisciplinary approach at IHLs: Chan Chun Sing

Current students and staff of Yale-NUS College were not consulted on the…