Singapore ten cents coin with Jasminum multiflorum flower closeup on stack of coins from Shutterstock.com

Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is seeking public feedback on the proposed new legal tender limit for coins.
Under the Currency Act, limits are placed on the amount of each coin denomination that can be used for payment, which are known as legal tender limits and the rationale for having them is to minimise the payee’s inconvenience and cost in handling large quantities of low denomination currency.
Under current law, the limits on using coins for payment are $2 per denomination for 5-cent, 10-cent and 20-cent coins, and S$10 for 50-cent coins. While, there are no limits for payment by S$1 coins.
MAS stressed that payee is obliged to accept payment up to these limits but may reject payments exceeding these limits.
In 2014, two cases of the use of coins for payment of large amounts were reported in the media. Following these reports, some members of the public expressed the need to place a legal tender limit on one-dollar coins to prevent similar abuses. MAS has since completed a review of the legal tender limits for the various denominations of coins, including the one-dollar coin.
MAS has since completed a review of the legal tender limits for the various denominations of coins, including the one-dollar coin.
The Authority said that it is proposing a limit of 10 coins per denomination across all denominations in a single transaction, which means that a payer can use up to 10 pieces each of 5-cent, 10-cent, 20-cent, 50-cent and S$1 coins per transaction
MAS is therefore, inviting comments from interested parties on the proposed new legal tender limit for coins.
However, it said, “Please note that all submissions received will be published and attributed to the respective respondents unless they expressly request MAS not to do so.  As such, if respondents would like their whole submission or part of it, or their identity, or both, to be kept confidential, please expressly state so in the submission to MAS.”
In addition, MAS stated that it reserves the right not to publish any submission received where MAS considers it not in the public interest to do so, such as where the submission appears to be libellous or offensive.
If members of the public are interested in filing written comments, Please submit them by 06 April 2017 to:

Currency Department
Monetary Authority of Singapore
109 Pasir Panjang Rd, Currency House
Singapore 118536
Fax: (65) 63494700

Email: [email protected]
Electronic submission is encouraged. MAS encourages members of the public to use this suggested Submission format for the submission to ease collation efforts.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Yahoo journalist highlights the problem with Singapore journalism – unequal access and self-censorship

On 14 June, renowned veteran journalist PN Balji launched his book Reluctant…

三官委议员坚持立场力争修《防假消息法》遭否决

5月8日,《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》在国会经过两天、超过13小时的马拉松辩论,最终以72赞成票、九张反对票、三张弃权票,三读通过。共有七名部长和次长、31名议员参与相关辩论,其中三名官委议员:王丽婷、特斯拉和郭秀钦,争取通过他们的修法建议但遭否决,在三读时投弃权票。 在辩论进行时,王丽婷数度提出《防假信息法》的修改建议,包括了要求部长们保证能够更加严格看待修正建议、将部长和政府的权限写入法案主体中、要求设立独立的理事会监督执法、还有上诉程序中的缺陷等等。 他们也呼吁政府修改法案中,对“事实”和“不真实信息”的定义,因为目前的定义仍然太过宽泛和主观。 在针对上诉程序中,三人建议在法案中加入一个阐明更多立法原则的条文,并且建议上诉程序必须迅速且成本低。惟,但是尚穆根对此建议表示不认同,他认为三人提出的原则过于宽泛,与之相比,政府反而给出了更具体的时间表。 三人多数建议中,有些在第二次辩论中就已经不被采纳,因此他们决定弃权。 特斯拉更是数度要求国会秘书将有关的弃权票数记录在案。 间中,工人党党魁毕丹星也曾经一度站起来发言,表示对于他们之前不被采纳的建议,每一条都投弃权票。(工人党立场是反对《防假消息法》) 工人党议员之前曾表示,法案将导致寒蝉效应,严重影响人们言论自由。 网民评论有褒有贬 三名官委议员的表现,在《网络公民》脸书专页上载后,网民反应有褒有贬。有人按赞,为三人的表现鼓掌,有人感到无奈,也有人觉得力量不足。 有网民对他们的表现感到敬佩,甚至称赞他们为勇敢的火枪手(brave musketeers)。…

新加坡政府指彭博社、《南华早报》报导有误

我国财政部、内政部、人力部和教育部等部门,自去年11月底开始,就四次援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),要求政治人物和一家时政网络媒体更正贴文。 我国政府动用《防假消息法》也引起外国媒体注意,包括《华盛顿邮报》、《经济学人》、彭博社和《南华早报》等,都跟进报导。 不过,日前通讯与新闻部长新闻秘书何慧玲,则致函彭博社和《南华早报》,抨击两家媒体对于我国《防假消息法》的报导不实,也重申我国没利用该法钳制言论自由。 彭博社指我国代表积极驳斥外媒报导 彭博社在去年12月27日,刊载一则《新加坡为捍卫防假消息法采全球攻势》(Singapore Goes on Global Offensive to Defend ‘Fake…

革新党肯尼斯昨从英国返新 需遵守14天居家通知

革新党秘书长肯尼斯惹耶勒南(Kenneth Jeyaretnam)近日刚从英国返新,必须执行14天居家通知,但届时他仍可授权一名代表完成提名程序。 据肯尼斯向《今日报》透露,他要求当局免去居家通知,但其请求未获得批准。 据卫生部和选举局昨日(25日)联合答复媒体询问时说,卫生部已评估肯尼斯提出免去居家通知的申请,但因公共卫生考量,而无法批准。 他必须和其他新加坡人一样,在指定的时间遵守居家通知,并接受冠病检测。这也意味着,他将无法在接下来两周内都走访选区。 询及如何让他签发授权书,也是一大挑战,卫生部和选举部表示已准备让肯尼斯与所需人员接触,以方便他签发授权书,以及作出法定声明,证明其提名文件中的陈述属实。 在国会选举(2019冠状病毒疾病特别安排)法令下,准候选人若须履行隔离令或居家通知,他可授权一名代表完成提名程序。该代表须有授权书,并且是有权投票的新加坡公民。 肯尼斯可以透过选举局网站,申请政治捐款证书和族群身份鉴定书,以及支付参选按柜金。 对此,革新党主席朱来成表示,肯尼斯必须在今日内提交政治捐款数和族群身份鉴定证书的申请表格,但碍于他无法通过酒店直接转交物品,因此朱来成指,他们也正在想办法。 至于填写提名表格仍须宣誓官的见证,朱来成表示,或许可通过视讯进行。 但另一个挑战是,若肯尼斯授权朱来成为代表,两人必须同属一个提名站,否则提名日当天,可能难以在一个小时内到两个地方。 询及革新党是否会让肯尼斯能够播出竞选广播而作出特别安排,朱来成仅表示拭目以待。…