Mother Nature Cambodia, a NGO that is “fighting to put an end to the systematic destruction of Cambodia’s precious natural resources” has engaged Singaporean law firm, Eugene Thuraisingam LLP (‘ET LLP’), to provide advice in relation to the alleged complicity of Singaporean Entities in the ‘Sand Mining Scam.’
If the fight is successfully brought before Singapore’s Courts, it would be unprecedented as it would be the first time that victims of an environmental disaster in Asia take action against the perpetrators – in this case, corporations and/or statutory bodies in Singapore.. A similar course of action was pursued in 2013 when Cambodian farmers rallied together to sue a UK Sugar Firm for millions.
The ‘Sand Mining Scam’
After Malaysia, Indonesia, and other neighboring countries reduced or outright banned sand exports to SIngapore due to environmental concerns, Singapore turned it’s attention to Cambodia’s sands to supplement it’s seemingly endless land reclamation efforts. Singapore began to buy large quantities of sand from ‘Koh Kong’. A quick search of our archives reveal that as far back as 2013, our writer, Joshua Chiang, was already raising red flags about the enterprise
The contentious issue in this enterprise is not the sale of Koh Kong’s sand per se but rather the unfettered manner in which the sales were conducted. This lack of restrain, Mother Nature Cambodia argues, led to sheer environmental destruction.

Fish stocks have been depleted across the estuaries where the mining is taking place, pollution from the mining barges is close to unbearable to those living nearby, riverbank collapse is endemic, and the only ones that benefit from the alleged benefits of deepening of the estuaries are the large barges that travel upstream to pick up the sand and transport it onto Singapore.  

The Cambodian Government defends itself by arguing that Koh Kong estuaries carry too much sand and thus need to be dredged for ‘navigational and hydrological reasons’. Mother Nature Cambodia claims that a key part of the scam lies in the role that the corrupted Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), as overall regulator of the sand mining, plays. Not only does it continues to issue permits to mining companies it knows have been willfully violating the law for years, it also readily provides assistance to these companies whenever accusations of wrongdoing are made.

In this picture, an ‘inspection team’ from MME led by secretary of state Dith Tina, pretends not to see that the riverbank has massively collapsed, that the estuary has magically become several meters wider, nor that the water depth measurements are three times the limit allowed. Credit – San Mala
In this picture, an ‘inspection team’ from MME led by secretary of state Dith Tina, pretends not to see that the riverbank has massively collapsed, that the estuary has magically become several meters wider, nor that the water depth measurements are three times the limit allowed. Credit: San Mala
Another alarming discrepancy lies in the lack of transparency. According to trade data from the United Nations, the Cambodian government claims to have exported less than 6 million tons of sand – worth about 6 Million USD – to Singapore. However, the same database shows that Singapore has imported more than 70 million tons of sand from Cambodia. This, Mother Natue Cambodia submits, serves as evidence that the Cambodian Government is allowing Singapore to illegally smuggle sand out of the country.
Mother Nature Cambodia’s relentless advocacy has not been without consequence. At least 3 of their activists have been jailed and countless others have been threatened and harassed. In the following video, A MNC activist is buried neck-deep in sand and asks the Cambodian Government a very simple question: Why were the 70 million tons of sand exported to Singapore missing from official government export figures?

 
Global Witness Report
The Global Witness report Shifting Sand: how Singapore’s demand for Cambodian sand threatens ecosystems and undermines good governance documents the environmental risk that Singapore’s love for Cambodian sand entails.
“Singapore’s rapid expansion is driving an ecologically and socially devastating sand-dredging industry in Cambodia, according to a new report released today by Global Witness. This booming trade is being monopolised by two prominent Cambodian Senators with close ties to Prime Minster Hun Sen – despite a supposed government ban on sand exports.”
The Report also dealt a devastating blow to the Singapore Government

“Singapore says that the import of sand is a purely commercial activity but it also presents itself as a regional leader on environmental issues.. The country’s failure to mitigate the social and ecological cost of sand dredging represents hypocrisy on a grand scale. If Singapore wants its environmental stance to be taken seriously, monitoring where the sand is sourced and what is being done to obtain it would be an obvious place to start.” – George Boden, GlobalWitness

Exchange between Mother Nature Cambodia and the Singapore Government
In January last year, Mother Nature Cambodia wrote to Singapore’s Ambassador to Cambodia. In the letter, the following questions were raised in addition to a request for an audience with the Ambassador.

  • Is Singapore still purchasing Cambodian sand and if so, how much has Singapore imported since 2008?
  • Which ministries are responsible for these imports and what is the sand being used for?
  • From which private companies have Singaporean authorities bought or imported this sand?
  • Which regulatory procedures apply to sand imports?
  • Is the Singaporean Government observing its own laws and international conventions that regulate the import of sand and the impacts of sand dredging?

In a brief reply, the Singaporean Embassy in Phnom Penh replied by stating that the Singapore Government played no role in the illegal smuggling of sand. It also stated that “Singapore does not condone any illegal activities.”
untitled

Satellite images don't lie: dozens of barges are busy extracting sand in just one of the many mining sites. Credit - Google Earth
Satellite images show dozens of barges extracting sand in just one of the many mining sites. Credit: Google Earth
Mother Nature Cambodia has dutifully compiled documents relating to the ‘sand mining scam’ which can be accessed here.
thu_llp_logo
Mr M Ravi, an International Human Rights Advocate and a non-practicising lawyer with ET LLP, wrote the following in a Facebook post
“I am looking forward to providing research and assisting the team who is representing Cambodian villagers via Mother Nature (a Cambodian-based NGO) who have instructed the firm to seek environmental justice. This would be our first major international environmental law case and one which affects the human rights of the villagers who have suffered loss of livelihood due to the alleged illegal mining activities.”
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

获取林学芬案审裁记录 律师公会:公众应向审裁庭秘书处购买

律师公会发出声明,指该公会不是纪律审裁庭资料库,也没有“法定义务(statutorily obliged)”把有关林学芬的审裁记录副本提供给公众。 昨日(3日),新加坡律师公会会长格雷戈瑞•维贾延德兰(Gregory Vijayendran)针对媒体询问,发表声明“厘清群众误解”,指民众应该去向审裁庭秘书处购买,而不是向该公会索取。 此前,在林学芬丈夫李显扬的一则帖文中,曾指出前者不认同审裁庭的报告,将在公堂审理时力争。 “群众都能透过律师公会获取有关闭门审裁庭审讯的完整记录。我呼吁群众仔细审视之,以达致他们对此事的独立结论。” 审裁庭秘书处是由最高法院设立,为审裁庭提供行政支援。 维贾延德兰称,民众可以从审裁庭秘书处,以一定费用购买有关记录副本。 他也表示,律师公会已遵循律师专业法令第93(5)条,在今年2月出版的公会月刊《法律公报》,发布有关审裁庭对林学芬的调查结果和裁决。 上月21日,纪律审裁庭发表裁决报告,裁定李显扬妻子林学芬,为已故建国总理李光耀准备遗嘱一事,专业行为失当,违反律师专业法令。 《海峡时报》星期刊报导引述审裁庭对林学芬妻子措辞严厉的批评,指责后者“不诚实,试图将证据形塑成自己是无辜受害者的形象”,以及“李显扬的行为也同样欺瞒。” 目前,林学芬的案子相信将转介到三司特别庭(Court…

我国今起全岛军事演习 马国防副长吁克制处理争议

随着我国在今日起,在全岛多个地点,包括大士一带进行军事演习,马来西亚国防部副部长刘镇东则指出,没有让双边情绪升温的必要,马方将以克制应对我国针对边界争议的对策。 刘镇东称,该国首相敦马和外交部长拿督赛夫丁,已经发出邀请,希望在月中与新加坡谈判。 马国媒体也询问对于新加坡在敏感时刻展开大规模军事演习,国防部有何看法,刘镇东仅表示“没有补充”结束访问,不愿置评。 武装部队演习至下周一 根据我国国防部文告,武装部队从今早巴士至本月17日,将在z实里达、马西岭、惹兰巴哈、梁宙、林厝港、惹兰国民、大士、裕廊上段、丰加、亚妈宫、勿洛码头、克拉芝、伦多、新邦、三巴旺和万礼进行演习。这项演习将使用空弹和雷光弹。 另外,陆军部队也于同一时间,在巴西拉峇实弹区进行实弹演习,演习时将使用实弹和信号弹。演习期间途经西柔佛海峡的船只应该保持在航道内,远离实弹演习区界限。 马来西亚外长赛夫丁则建议为新马海事争议降温,两国应停止派遣船只到柔佛海峡具争议水域: Malaysia proposes to de-escalate maritime…

Japan to introduce departure tax of ¥1,000 for travellers leaving the country beginning 7 Jan 2019

Japan has introduced a departure tax for people leaving the country from…