By Joshua Chiang

The nature lodge that my girlfriend and I were staying at for our long weekend getaway was – like many of the settlements along the Tatai river in Koh Kong province, Cambodia – only accessible by boat. This region is still relatively untouched by urbanization, making it an ideal place of sorts for the burgeoning eco-tourism industry in the Kingdom. Here you might still see hornbills, crocodiles, sun bears, and, judging by the road signs along the highway to the province, elephants. Of course these are animals are notoriously shy and the only wild creature that I saw bigger than my hand was a 20-cm long black snake.

And yes, leeches. Lots of them. But you don’t really get to pick and choose which sort of nature you want to get to close when you opt for a holiday in a nature reserve.

On the second day, we trekked – with the help of a machet-happy jungle guide – through a thick bamboo forest to the mighty Tatai Waterfall and then went for a swim further downstream. The following day, we took the canoe out to some of the smaller waterfalls along the river. Anyone with some time to spare while holidaying in Cambodia, and sick of the usual Phnom Penh/Siem Reap circuit should seriously consider a trip down to the Tatai, that is provided you don’t mind leeches.

1374912_10151649935621024_61088238_n
Dawn on the Tatai. (view from my lodge)
1378330_10151649936266024_283609105_n
The mighty Tatai waterfall

But this isn’t really a review meant for TripAdvisor. This is about something more sobering.

During the last evening of our stay, we spoke at length to the owner of the lodge. Turned out he wasn’t the one who built the lodge; he took over the business from a previous owner who started the lodge as a way to help the local community. (When you receive your bill, you will be asked if you want to make donation to some of the ongoing community projects in the region that’s mostly got to do with children’s education and helping keep the livelihood of the people – more on that later).

The current owner also revealed that chief among the problems threatening the local community and their way of life is the issue of sand-dredging. The main culprit was someone who called himself the “King of Koh Kong”. The damage to the environment is pretty significant; over the last ten years, the mangrove forests along the river have retreated by as much as 300 metres – this has impacted the river life as well; fish stock which was plentiful had been greatly reduced. And that it took place within a protected nature reserve made it all the more, well, depressing.

What about the locals, did they simply take it lying down? Apparently not. The previous owner kicked up enough fuss to make the “King of Koh Kong” sign a contract stating that his company would cease sand-dredging activities in the area. It was a Pyrrhic victory. Within a few months, the ‘King’ shut down his company… and started a new one and it was business as usual. Among the reasons why the previous owner sold the lodge, exhaustion from fighting the ongoing sand-dredging is one of them.

1234523_10151649937176024_1042356103_n
Evidence of Sand dredging along the river
1379492_10151649937786024_906245687_n
Possible evidence of sand dredging along the river

Now this probably sounds like the usual story you here so often about Cambodia – crooked politicians whose hands can be easily greased, nasty businessmen who couldn’t care less they had broken some laws… what has it got to with you, that is, if you are a Singaporean.

Actually lots. See, Singapore is the main importer of sand from Cambodia, according to this extensive report by Global Witness. (click here)

Now that in itself wouldn’t be a problem, because the sand necessary for all that (over) building on our crowded little island has to come from somewhere. And after we’ve exhausted our sand supplies back in the Sixties, and later, when Malaysia and Indonesia decided to ban sand export to Singapore because we’re stealing their beaches and charging exorbitant prices for a glass of Long Island Tea to patrons of Siloso Beach, where else can we get our sand?

The problem is that there is compelling evidence to suggest that most of Cambodian sands exported to Singapore came from PROTECTED AREAS.  Areas like Koh Kong province. In response to queries from Global Witness, the Singapore Government wrote in 2010 that

“the import of sand to Singapore is done on a commercial basis. The Singapore government is not a party to any agreement or contract for the import of sand.”

I shall not go into details how that is a flimsy defense; Page 29-30 of the report pretty much shows the Singapore Government is culpable. The irony is of course the Government Singapore has ratified the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the UN Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS).xxvi These give the Singapore government and its nationals the same responsibilities as Cambodia to protect marine ecosystems and prevent against environmental degradation in its national waters, as well as the wider marine environment – such as dredging in Cambodia’s waters.

Our massive carbon footprint doesn’t just end there. The recent haze that choked Singapore might not have been due to the actions of palm oil company CTP Holdings, a Cargill-Temesak Holdings joint venture, but there are enough evidences to suggest that their claims of ethical practices in southern Indonesia is nothing but a glossy spin. (Google “Cargill’s Problem with Palm Oil’) The impact of their activities isn’t just environmental; it wrecks havoc on the lives of the indigenous people.

(On a side note, it would be highly ironic that a company partly owned by Singapore through Temasek Holdings could eventually be responsible for the disappearance of Ah Meng’s cousins in the wild. (link) (Ah Meng, for the uninformed, was a female orangutan whom, until her death was the public face of the acclaimed Singapore Zoological Gardens))

In response to a question on work-life balance on a televised show a few nights ago, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said, “If you look at other countries: Vietnam, China, even in India, they’re not talking about work-life balance; they are hungry, anxious, about to steal your lunch.”

I wonder if he realized the actions of companies linked to his government aren’t merely stealing lunches from the people in neighboring countries.

They’re robbing livelihoods outright.

This article was first appeared on Joshua Chiang’s note.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

黄循财:未来再无分流制 转型科目编班全面计划

教育部长兼财政部第二部长黄循财表示,未來将会移除分流制(streaming),在中学全面实施科目编班全面计划(Full Subject-based Banding)。 黄循财于今日(4日)在脸书上发文表示,要从分流制转换到科目编班全面计划的确是非常重大的工程,尤其是对于教学和课程安排上。 前教育部长王乙康,是在去年3月作出宣布,本地中学生的普通和快捷源流之区分,将在2024年结束,正式宰了落实近40年的分流制“圣牛”。 他也指出,日前曾到访试点中学立德中学(Riverside Secondary School),其中有许多来自不同背景的中一学生,他们除了共同学习品格与公民教育课程(CCE),其他科目如英语、数学或科学都会根据他们的学科群分组学习。 经视察后,黄循财表示,其效果确实非常正面,从教师中反馈中可得知学生能够根据自己的节奏,并在没有任何偏见底下安心学习,加强自己的强项,同时也能够在小班课程建立稳固的同侪关系。 “有一位老师告诉我,在年头(疫情爆发前),学生参与了为期一周的培训课程,他们一同生活在一起,有助于建立稳固的友谊,让他们进入下一个课程。在科目比较强的同学能够协助较为弱的同学,而且每个人都有自己的学习节奏,又不附带任何标签学习,亦能够融入班级中。” 基于种种可见的好处,黄循财表示,将决定在明年推广新的教育改革,逐步改善学校的教育制度。 科目编班计划是在2014年推出,当时有12所中学试行,让普通源流学生从中一起就根据个人强项修读程度较高的科目。计划取得良好成效,去年已扩大到所有提供普通源流的中学,但学生目前可选的科目只限于英文、母语、数学和科学。…

SPF: Facebook message of child kidnapped at Jurong Point Shopping Centre not true

The police have responded to the message circulating on Facebook about a…

打击全岛毒贩 肃毒局四日逮94嫌犯

中央肃毒局指出,在本月4日至8日期间展开的全岛逮捕行动中,一共逮捕了94名涉及滥用毒品的犯罪者。 肃毒局于上周五(11月8日)发出文告,指出在逮捕行动中一共取获了314克的冰毒、18克大麻、384克海洛因、498颗摇头丸、652颗埃利敏5号,以及40克的新化合致幻药(New Psychoactive Substances)。 逮捕行动涵盖的区域包括了宏茂桥、武吉巴督、武吉班让、裕廊、巴西立、信佳、中峇鲁、兀兰和义顺一带。 女嫌犯当时带着三幼童 文告中指出,肃毒局在本月4日的一起案件中,官员在裕廊西91大道带了一名47岁的女子,怀疑她涉嫌毒品贩卖。 当局指出,在该案件中起获两包冰毒,怀疑属于该女嫌犯。 “嫌犯被逮捕时,身边带着三名幼子,包括她代为照顾的一名一岁大女婴、其六岁的孙子和五岁的孙女。该一岁大女婴随后交还给其生母。” 但是,肃毒局多次尝试联络另两名孩子的母亲未果,唯有将他们交给家庭及社会发展部旗下的儿童福利部。 疑毒品交易逮四人 上周三(11月6日)晚上,当局在另一起发生于Jalan…

Very important that civil society be strengthened: Ho Kwon Ping

“How important is freedom of press to economic future?” was the question…