Source : istana.gov.sg.

Government feedback portal, REACH, had scheduled to hold a public forum on the controversial amendments to the elected presidency on 29 Sept but proceeded to cancel the event due to “poor response”

Minister of Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugan and Minister of State Chee Kong Tat was due to speak in the public forum which was supposed to be held at Furama City Centre, Grand Ballroom, between 6.30 to 9.00 pm.

TOC had registered to attend the event but was told that the event was cancelled just days after it sent a confirmation to attendees.

Confirmation letter for TOC.
Confirmation letter for TOC.
Cancellation letter to TOC.
Cancellation letter to TOC.

Another of one such attendee was Dr Tan Cheng Bock. Dr Tan, who tendered his resignation from the People’s Action Party (PAP) prior to the PE2011, was one of the most popular Members of Parliament from the PAP. His 88 percent victory in the 2001 parliamentary elections was the PAP’s best score in 31 years.

Dr Tan, who is a medical doctor, had been an MP for Ayer Rajah single-seat ward from 1980 to 2006. He has also been since 1991 a non-executive chairman of Chuan Hup investment holding company, whose issued and paid-up capital according to annual reports stands at US$152 million (S$189 million).

Dr Tan wrote on his Facebook page saying that he had assigned to attend the public forum last week, where he had planned to attend with a few friends and family. He said he was happy that he had received the confirmation letter.

dr-tan-1

He also attached his confirmation letter from REACH.

14542857_186271518477812_1672993182_n

However, only a day before the public forum was due to be held, REACH sent another letter which said that the forum was cancelled with the reason of “poor response.” It also posted the cancellation notification on its Facebook page and added that it had not received any registration under Dr Tan’s name.

reach

 

Dr Tan replied to the statement by saying that he had registered under his alias, “Adrian Tan.” He said that the registration also asked for NRIC number, mobile, address, and occupation which he supplied.

14542602_1150143158393551_8472174832326858658_o

Dr Tan’ daughter, Tan Ming Li also responded to REACH’s post by posting on the original post. She said it was strange for REACH to say that it did not receive her father’s registration since Dr Tan had already supplied the registration form with his NRIC numbers, address, date of birth, email, mobile number, gender, and occupation.

She asked, “Given all the information you know, are you still implying that my father did not register for this event?”

tan-ming-li

Given the attention that the forum garnered so much attention, it is puzzling how poor attendance is to have REACH cancel the event last min after sending out the confirmation.

It is also puzzling why REACH required participants to submit personal particulars such as NRIC number, mobile, address, and occupation for the purpose of registration for the event as if the tedious registration process is meant to deter interested participants to the event.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

港高庭判《禁蒙面法》违宪

上月4日,香港特首林郑月娥宣布引用《紧急情况规例条例》通过《禁止蒙面规例》 ;任何人身处受规管的公众集会或公众游行,或非法集结(包括暴动)或未经批准的集结时,使用可能隐藏身份的蒙面物品,即属犯罪。 不过,香港高等法院在今日(18日)却裁定,港府上述紧急法在“危害公安”的情况下使用,属违反《基本法》,而《禁蒙面法》对基本权利限制超乎合理需要,亦属违宪。 据了解有24名泛民议员和前议员梁国雄(“长毛”)向法庭提出司法复核,他们指《紧急法》绕过香港立法会,赋予特首不受约束的立法权力,有违《基本法》。 针对《禁蒙面法》,他们质疑为何涵盖和平集会,且此法反而会激起更多抗议示威,遏制成效有限。 港府代表则说,《紧急法》没有与《基本法》条文相抵触,并称港府设“禁蒙面法”,为的是“拯救年轻人及香港市民”。 不过,在本周三法庭将聆审诉辩双方陈词,以商讨补救裁决所引发的情况。 港府颁《禁蒙面法》冲突仍持续 在上月4日,林郑月娥指示威者在使用暴力时几乎以蒙面形式进行,目的是为了隐藏身份、逃避行责。 他相信反蒙面发有效阻止激进分子违法,并有助于警方执法。 然而此举反而引来香港民间更激烈反弹,10月初香港多区仍有大型示威活动。仍有港民蒙面上街。  

NKF terminated CEO Edmund Kwok due to “personal indiscretion”?

The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) announced in a press release the Chief…

取缔家中抽烟? 傅海燕:比取缔家中裸露难得多

去年10月,义顺集选区议员黄国光在国会提出休会动议,呼吁政府立法禁止人们继续在窗边或阳台吸烟,管制二手烟问题,引来坊间两极化的回应。 永续发展与环境部部长傅海燕,于本月4日在国会坦言,要取缔那些在家中抽烟的人,比起取缔在家中公开裸露者更有难度。 她指出,以当前科技,要取缔家中抽烟的烟民“仍有挑战性”,要采用非侵入性的方法下,追踪和取证烟民吸烟行为,这也可能无意间影响邻居的隐私。 “如果抽烟者躲在柱子、磨砂玻璃窗或窗帘后,就更难发现。” 相比之下,投诉者较能反映和捕抓到,那些在家中裸露者的证据或照片,以协助当局调查。 无论如何,她表示政府仍会继续检讨现有措施,保护公众免受二手烟的危害。 尽管一些居民担忧,家中抽烟也管,会侵犯民众隐私,但黄国光仍坚持,我国已禁止居民在家裸露或在组屋养猫等,为何不能对二手烟有相同管制。 他也建议,政府可采用目前用来抓高楼抛物的电眼,以及设在公共走廊等抓违例吸烟者的热成像摄像机,来捕捉在窗边或阳台吸烟者。

Sparkletots幼园肠胃炎病例增至238起

人民行动党社区基金会(PCF)旗下的Sparkletots幼儿园,爆发疑似食物中毒事故,卫生部昨日接获共184起肠胃炎病例的投报。 然而,截至今日下午四时,肠胃炎病例总数已攀升至238起,行动党社区基金会发言人指出,其中222位是学童。受影响的Sparkletots幼园也增至12所。 此外,卫生部指一家位于乌美第一道306座的P.L.A.N. 学生托管中心,也传出16起肠胃炎病例。不过,不清楚他们是否也食用过由Kates Catering所准备的食物。 目前,Sparkletots肠胃炎患者仍有25人住院,11人已出院。包括学童等住院者目前情况稳定。 该基金会总裁Victor Bay指出,认真看待最近的事故,并优先确保孩童获得必要的医疗照顾;同时,和老师及加州密切联系和监督孩子们的情况,“我的高级职员也前往医院探访那些受影响的孩子,并尽量为他们提供帮助。” 他补充,目前已安排由其他获认证的供应商来准备校园的膳食。 在今日确定受影响的五家幼园,分别位于盛港中路第231、榜鹅岸第326、巴耶利巴第221、大巴窑中心第146A及第79B座组屋。 至于之前受影响的七家幼园位于:盛港中路第210、270、290A、298B、榜鹅北,及盛港中路第262A和208座组屋。 卫生部、环境局、农粮兽医局在本周三的文告表示,当局尚在调查发生在该幼儿园的多起肠胃炎病例,并表示出现征状者事前曾食用由Kate’s Catering供应,在甘榜安拔(Kampong…