A 29-year-old policeman, Staff Sergeant Woo Poh Liang admitted to receiving $35,000 in bribes to help a 45-year-old man Filipino Angelo Salvador Beltran avoid being charged for insulting the modesty of a woman.by taking upskirt videos at Jurong East MRT station on 22 May 2014.

Woo was an investigation officer at Clementi Police Division who joined the Singapore Police Force (SPF) in June 2008. However, he had since been suspended from his job since 29 January 2015.

He pleaded guilty on Tuesday to two charges of corruption.

Along with the two charges, he also faced seven charges under the Betting Act.

Woo had taken part in illegal betting during the FIFA World Cup 2014 matches. He was also being charged with another 11 charges under the Common Gaming Houses Act for buying lottery tickets worth S$2,164 from someone called Tan Zhi Liang Gordon on 28 May and 19 July 2014. He placed illegal bets via TOTO and 4D totalling over S$2,000 and placed bets amounting to over S$24,000 on the World Cup matches on 23 June 2014.

According to Straits Times’ report, Deputy Public Prosecutor Norman Yew said that Woo took a statement from Beltran on 10 September 2014. He was reportedly suggested writing in Beltran’s statement that he had just taken 5 videos, despite the fact that Woo found many of them on Beltran’s devices.

Beltran did so as he understood that Woo was trying to help him.
Six days later, Woo asked Beltran if they could trust each other. When Beltran replied, “Yes”, Woo then said that he needed $100,000 for his father who was suffered from cancer. At that time, Beltran showed a psychiatric report Woo, who then told him that the case was very serious.

Beltran said that he had only $35,000. Woo then asked for all the money and asked him to hand $25,000 to him in $1,000 bills the next day. Beltran agreed with Woo’s proposition as he understood that Woo would help him to avoid being charged for his offence.

Beltran withdrew $25,000 and $10,000 from two bank accounts on 17 September 2014 and he handed the $25,000 in an envelope along with a letter requesting the return of his passport to Woo at a taxi stand.

Beltran then texted Woo to say that he needed the passport as he was required to travel to the United States for training the following week. Woo then told him to bring a letter from his company to the police station.

Beltran then went to the police station and handed him the letter. However, Woo said that he could not get his passport back. He asked Beltran to follow him to the investigation room and asked how much money Beltran had left. Beltran said he only had $10,000 left, which Woo asked for as well.

Beltran handed the rest of the money he had, and Woo told him that “90 to 95 percent chance he would get a warning”.

However, the next day, Woo told Beltran that he still would be charged. Although, Woo promised that he would help him to get a lighter sentence.

Under the advice of his lawyer, Nakoorsha A.K, Beltran then complained to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) about Woo’s conduct in September 2014.

The defence lawyer will give his mitigation plea on 11 October.

The maximum punishment for corruption is a $100,000 fine and five years’ jail on each charge.

Prosecution of police officers on corruption is rare in Singapore. In December 2015, a former senior investigation officer at the Singapore Police Force was charged in court on Thursday (Dec 24) for criminal breach of trust and intentionally obstructing the course of justice.

According to a statement by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), Mr Yeo Lwee Siong, 41, is accused of dishonestly misappropriating about $4,700 in restitution monies, which belonged to the victims of a motor insurance fraud case that he was investigating.

He also allegedly shredded a police report and an acknowledgement form relating to the restitution money. The sentence has yet to be passed.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MOH looking into actual cause of death of COVID-19 confirmed patient

In a COVID-19 update yesterday (8 April), the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

COVID-19: Testing all migrant workers living in dormitories could lead to a big jump in cases

National Development Minister Lawrence Wong announced on Tuesday (12 May) that all…

191 additional COVID-19 infection; 8th death confirmed and 119 untraceble cases

As of Saturday (11 April), 12 pm, the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

联合国报告员:过大权力干涉言论自由

联合国言论自由权问题特别报告员凯伊(David Kaye)日前发表声明,促请新加坡政府撤回《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》(POFMA),并应予以立法机关与公众更充足讨论空间,确保法案符合国际人权法。 凯伊在上周三(24日)向我国总理李显龙致函一则措辞强烈的声明,抨击《防假信息法》不仅对“真伪消息”拥有绝对的酌情权,也成为政府打击言论自由的基本依据,构成自由言论的阻碍,尤其是公共辩论、政策批判及持不同政见之言论。 凯伊表示,他在法案中发现疑惑之处,例如:任何部长及相关执法人员将获赋予权力,可以裁定何谓“虚假陈述“。这也会促使他们滥用该权力来抑制、审查及惩罚网上言论,限制言论自由。 “我在担任特别报告员期间,曾目睹有者利用法律来对付“假消息“的案例。通常用以对付新闻记者、维权人士等人,而这样的法律也带来了深远的影响。“凯伊强调。 打击假消息予以重罚,无疑削弱公众对政府的信心 我国政府与4月1日向国会提呈《防假信息法》,并预计在下月初进行二读辩论。 该法第二条第一项,任何陈述如果“部分和全篇”被指“虚假、误导性”,可以被认定为假消息。凯伊认为部长甚至只需取文章段落,要求将之更正或删除。 凯伊也批评,基本上,该法案并未提供总理或执法者,清楚的方向来如何断定消息的真伪,已偏离国际人权法中对信息清晰度与可预测性的标准。 他还说,政府以刑事罪定义网络假消息,而以上说法已赋予部长或执法者强制更正或撤下部分或全部内容的权力,限制网络消息的散播,无疑是削弱公众对政府的信任。 严苛刑罚产生寒蝉效应 严苛罚款或刑罚等不正当的处置,也可能会不当地扼杀了新闻记者、维权人士,政治评论者及在野党的言论自由,增加审查、寒蝉效应的影响。…