Zulfikar Shariff and his friends posing with the ISIS flag

Zulfikar Shariff’s arrest under the Internal Security Act (ISA) came as a surprise to many, but not all.

There were many warning signs, even from a decade ago. To me, at least, it is a wonder how he got away with such things for so long. I would argue that his arrest is a testament as to why there is a need for discussion on Islamic Reform and why it is so pressing to do so.

Zulfikar Shariff and his friends posing with the ISIS flag
Zulfikar Shariff and his friends posing with the ISIS flag

Here you have Mr Zulfikar Shariff, a Muslim who is well versed in Islamic Theology and pretty eloquent. Some may even say, from his posts and personal experiences, that he is someone who can be very convincing.

In these 3 posts below, you will be able to read how he calls upon ‘moderate’ Muslims, presumably those who live amongst us in Singapore and the region, and cites hadiths, verses and events in Islamic history in an effort to convince them that ‘Jihad’ and ‘Offensive Wars’ are not only necessary but an essential and fundamental part of Islam.

13686630_668007550013725_9210887615083388192_n

He has the temerity to go as far as to ask Muslims to take up arms for causes which a significant proportion of Muslims in Singapore are sympathetic towards like the plight of the Palestinians and the Rohingya.

Conversations about the religion

The problem arises when Muslims reading the posts start pondering about the legitimacy of these verses, hadiths and stories. And when they are actually found in the Quran and/or other reputable texts, they face a dilemma. They know that these acts do not sit well with them inherently, but they are conflicted as to what to do to reconcile their beliefs and what the religion advocates.

This is how the seeds of Islamic Terror are sowed amongst seemingly peaceful and moderate Muslims. And unfortunately, if what the Ministry of Home Affairs has said is true,  2 have already been radicalised as a result of Mr Shariff’s postings.

Amongst those who may not take up arms per se, a number of them may stay silent too if and when such atrocities occur, especially against groups of people like the LGBT Community (as seen in Orlando) or the Isrealis.

When faced with verses, hadiths and anecdotes like these, it is all the more important that questioning their relevance shouldn’t be equated to apostasy or Islamaphobia.

If the Christian Church can choose to disregard verses which justify slavery, Islam can and must do the same for anachronistic and barbaric verses and practices. It is of utmost importance that we have this conversation. Any hope of a lasting reformist movement should start from the ground up. Deference to authority, be it MUIS or ISIS, would create an unhealthy cycle where once again we let others, and not our morals, steer the ship.

I would expect to see a considerable number of comments from Muslims who perceive the very act of questioning the faith as blasphemy. I would be the first to admit that this conversation isn’t one that is easy. After all, we were always taught that the Quran is the final word of god and to question it or be selective in which verses we choose to heed would seem illogical. Nevertheless, so many different sects of Islam still exist. And for us to begin and adopt a more liberal and tolerant strand of Islam, would do no one any harm. In fact, I submit that it would do a great good.

I doubt ‘all-loving gods’ would punish someone for being too peaceful, too tolerant and too reasonable.

A new defined law for terrorist threats

Also, on a related issue. I have argued against the use of indefinite detention without trial provided under the ISA before. Under the ISA, the state is granted with executive power to enforce preventive detention, prevent subversion, suppress organized violence against persons and property, and do other things incidental to the internal security of Singapore. Basically, it is a law that gives unlimited powers to the authorities in the name of national security.

Zulfikar was arrested under the Internal Security Act. As of now, it is not known if the Ministry of Home Affairs plans to eventually bring formal charges against him, as they have done recently with the radicalized Bangladeshi workers. However, such a law is open to abuse.

Ideally, a separate law to deal with terrorist threats should be introduced. Something like the UK’s Terrorism Act.

One which incorporates a limited period of preventive detention (4 weeks?) with the renewal subject to the approval of an ombudsman, after-which the accused must be brought to trial. I think it provide sufficient time to gather evidence for a trial in open court.

Original Post from Ariffin Sha’s Facebook

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

《慈母舰》采访普杰立视频出现政党标志、宣传政策 本地导演质问资媒局:是否抵触《电影法》?

本地电影导演施忠明在脸书发文分享,他今早电邮致函资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA),向后者询问本地英语网络媒体“慈母舰”制作的一段视频,因其内容呈现政党标志、有政治人物宣传政治课题,是否抵触了《电影法》禁止制作政党政治影片的条文? 新加坡英语网络媒体“慈母舰”(Mothership sg)日前录制视频,采访交通部高级政务部长普杰立医生,内容谈及陆路交通规划和2040年陆路交通发展总蓝图。 由于普杰立的父亲多米尼克(Dominic Puthucheary),曾是社阵政治人物,视频中的快问快答访谈,不免询问普杰立,行动党和社阵,会如何选择。后者则回答选行动党,不过他说很久以前两者过去曾在一起(指社阵领袖原一同创立行动党,惟后来因政见不同离开)。 针对这段视频,施忠明质疑,既然这是“慈母舰”拍摄、并非政府创作的视频,就不能在《电影法》下的第40条文被豁免(只有政府指示或发行的影片可豁免)。 而根据新加坡《电影法》第33条文,私自制作政党政治影片是被违法的。在该条文下,任何人进口、制作、发行或放映政党政治影片即属犯罪,可面对不超过10万元的罚款或监禁不超过两年。 施忠明认为,上述视频里又出现偏驳政治立场、政治人物推介政治课题、出现政党标志等等。 ”敢问有关视频是否已送交(资媒局)进行分级?在电影法第33条文下,会否被归类为政党政治影片?“他在电邮中如是质问资媒局。 2015年民主党拍《白衣牌洗衣粉》视频 此外,施忠明也在贴文中附上2015年的一个案例,那时资媒局指民主党制作的一段诙谐讽刺短片,根据《电影法》定义乃是政党政治影片。 对此民主党领导徐顺全批评资媒局选择性地诠释该法,因为政府也有以漫画的形式,借中国寓言和歌舞等来生动描绘建国一代配套和终身健保等重要政策。…

80-years-old man caught with duty-unpaid cigarettes at Singapore Cruise Centre

A total of three cartons, 34 packets, and 21 loose sticks of…

乌克兰笑匠总统解除国务院长职位,由副总统暂代

乌克兰上个月举行总统大选,由41岁的谐星泽连基斯(Volodymyr Zelenskyi)当选。昨日(11日)宣布解除国务院长伊凡(Ivan Kutsyk),点名由副总统谢赫依.波佐夫(Serhii Borzov)担任代理院长。 根据《乌克兰新闻社》(Ukrainian News Agency)报道,国务院于2018年前总统与其他官员共花费高达十亿乌克兰格里夫纳。他也宣布将于2019年减少总统与其他官员的活动花费。 现任总统泽连斯基自宣布参选以来备受争议。在5月20日国会宣誓就职,便旋即解散国会,择期改选,大大挑战了乌克兰政治的传统作风。他在上任后表示,重启和谈将是他上任后的首要之务。 在就职演说期间,泽连基斯呼吁官员别再依惯例在办公室挂上总统肖像。他说,“总统不是偶像,别再将我的肖像挂在你的办公室内,而将你的孩子与家人相片挂上去,在做任何一项决定前,请直视他们的双眼。” 长期贪腐与叛乱导致人民失望,政治素人获民心 现年41岁的泽连基斯原本是一名喜剧演员,2015年在乌克兰知名政治喜剧《人民公仆》饰演一名批评政府的中学历史老师而爆红。通过众筹参加总统选举,建立与电视台同名的政党《人民公仆》,以自身的影响力及社群媒体的传播力量,赢得大量的支持,最终当选总统职位。 根据《112.International》报道,他在宣誓就职时,旋即宣布解散国会并安排7月改选。据悉,泽连基斯虽然深受民众爱戴,但其政党并无任何席位,将在日后推行政策有所影响,可能都成为了他解散国会的动机。…

Only one case confirmed of Zika virus infection

The National Environment Agency (NEA) has stated that as of 21 September,…