The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has announced that a 44-year-old Singaporean has been arrested in Singapore and subsequently detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) in July 2016 for terrorism-related activities.

MHA has said that Zulfikar bin Mohamad Shariff has been served with an Order of Detention (OD) for a period of two years, in view of the high level of the terrorism threat that Singapore currently faces, and the global terrorism threat posed by ISIS, Zulfikar’s promotion of violence and ISIS and his radicalising influence pose a security threat to Singapore.

According to sources, he was taken into custody when he crossed the border into Singapore on 1 July and is charged today after being held for 30 days while under investigation for postings over Facebook. His family members were notified earlier about the pending detention order.

facebook ISA

According to MHA’s press release, Zulfikar bin Mohamad Shariff is said to have made use of social media to propagate and spread his radical messages.  He considered his propagation of radical material as a form of jihad, by way of creating awareness of ISIS and promoting armed jihad.  It is also said that Zulfikar has contributed to the radicalisation of at least two other Singaporeans.

It is said that Zulfikar has supported terrorism and the terrorist group that calls itself the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).  He made numerous Facebook postings glorifying and promoting ISIS and their violent actions, while exploiting religion to legitimise the terrorist activities of ISIS.

In a photo produced by MHA,  a photograph shows Zulfikar with his children mimicking a pose commonly adopted by jihadi fighters, while standing in front of a black flag that is commonly used by jihadi terrorist groups.

MHA states that Zulfikar has admitted that besides his intention to promote ISIS and armed jihad, he also wanted his online followers to reject the Western secular democratic nation-state system and instead establish an Islamic caliphate in its place, governed by Syariah law.

It is also stated that Zulfikar believes that violence should be used to achieve this goal if necessary.  To this end, Zulfikar had actively looked into holding training programmes aimed at radicalising young Singaporeans so that they would be persuaded into joining his extremist agenda.  It was also for the objective of realising the establishment of a global Islamic caliphate that he set up an online group called “Al-Makhazin” in 2013, and other “Al-Makhazin” Facebook platforms for Muslims to counter the Western media, while residing in Australia.

According to MHA, Zulfikar has admitted that he had an ulterior motive for setting up a Facebook page called “Al-Makhazin Singapore” which he used as a platform to agitate on Muslim issues in Singapore and attack some Singaporean Muslims who did not share his views.  His real agenda was in fact to provoke Muslims in Singapore into pushing for the replacement of the democratic system with an Islamic state in Singapore.  He said that he hid his ulterior motive from the Singaporean “Al-Makhazin Singapore” members.

It said, “The Government takes a very serious view of efforts to undermine Singapore’s constitutional democracy, and will take firm and decisive action against any person who engages in such activities.”

Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam commented on the same day of the announcement that individuals who preached extremism and motivate others to commit violence were more dangerous than those who inflict physical harm and kill.

Other than the detention of Zulfikar, restriction orders (RO) have been issued against two individuals, Mohamed Saiddhin bin Abdullah, 33 and a 17-year-old.  The RO is to prevent them from going further down the path of radicalism and violence.

A person issued with RO must abide by several conditions and restrictions. For example, he is not permitted to change his residence or employment, or travel out of Singapore, without the prior approval of Director, ISD. The individual issued with RO also cannot issue public statements, address public meetings or print, distribute, contribute to any publication, hold office in, or be a member of any organisation, association or group without the prior approval of Director, ISD.

For the full press release by MHA, visit this url link.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SDP takes POFMA battle to court, files summons against Manpower Minister Josephine Teo

Following the Minister of Manpower Josephine Teo’s rejection of the Singapore Democratic…

S$750 rental price for Coffin-size room in Yishun, landlord claims it has “superior environment”

SINGAPORE – An advertisement for “a room” for rent on Facebook has…

许渊臣针对《防假消息法》表达看法 通讯新闻部发文澄清

上周五,《网络公民》总编许渊臣在个人脸书,针对《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA)发表个人观点,提出该法上诉时间程序,在选举期间可能被滥用,限制公民发表言论的忧虑。 《防假消息法》刚在本月2日起生效。自提呈国会以来,就已饱受争议,不仅政界人士,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑,例如担忧法案“定义笼统”、部长/执法机关权力过于广泛、以及可能产生寒蝉效应等,反而不利于公民间对公共政策的良性讨论。 依据该法,如部长/指定人士发出更正/撤除内容/文章的指示,如当事者不满可提出上诉,对上诉的审核期限为两日。 不过,如果上诉也被部长驳回怎么办?可以上诉到高等法院。根据《防假消息法》的附属条例,法庭常务官(Duty Registrar)安排审理当事者上诉个案的聆讯日,通常会是第六个工作日后。 对此,许渊臣认为,仅仅是对部长提出上诉、被驳回再申请法庭聆讯,整个申诉过程就至少要耗掉八天(工作日)的时间,而且还未算上当事人收到指示、以及寻求法律咨询、准备申诉辩词所需的时间。 再者,也没有任何指南显示在聆讯后何时必须作出判决。 反观,新加坡选举从提名日到投票,通常仅需时九日。故此许渊臣打个比方,假设有者要在2015年大选前,想针对集体感染C型肝炎事故进行爆料,执政政府会否发出撤文/跟更正指示,要求证实有关消息是确凿的?那么一般选民就没有机会去听一听,到底爆料消息想表达什么。 而且爆料当事人恐怕要走繁冗的上诉程序,要在工作日抽空提交法律文件到法庭。尽管针对部长撤文指示的上诉聆讯首三日免费,但是第四个聆讯日起,就要6000新元的收费。 有鉴于鲜有政府败诉的先例,这些不利因素,可能让一般民众望而却步,似乎足以堵住悠悠众口。 许渊臣对此讽喻,可能将来新加坡的牛津词典会出现一个新词,形同行动党政府“泼马”(pofma’d)了前方障碍,透过限制公民揭发有关部长和政策的负面消息,在选举中取得空前胜利。 《网络公民》英语站也分享了总编的贴文。…

MFA alerts members of the public of phone scammers asking to make monetary transfers

Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) issued an alert on Tuesday (18 June)…