Lam Pin Min
See [left] ; Lam [right]
See [left] ; Lam [right]
The Singapore Police has decided not to take any further action against People’s Action Party (PAP) Member of Parliament for Sengkang West SMC, Lam Pin Min, over a post he had made online.

Dr Lam, who is also Minister of State for Health, had posted in February this year about the arrest of three men over an incident during the Thaipusam festival.

His post had linked to an article on the blog, Lovely Singapore, together with the note:

“An example of how alcohol intoxication can cause rowdiness and public nuisance.”

The article, TOC understands, has since been removed by the blogsite, but it is unclear why it had done so.

Filmmaker Martyn See later filed a police report, alleging that Dr Lam had contravened the Sedition Act (Chapter 290) and that his post was sub judice contempt of court.

He accused Dr Lam of having “distorted an allegation by the Police into a statement of fact”.

An earlier police statement on the arrest of the three men had said that “all three men were believed to have been drinking earlier as they smelt strongly of alcohol.”

Mr See said that this, however, was yet to be ascertained by the authorities as fact and the three men have not be guilty as charged.

One of the three men alleged to be involved in the incident had also denied being drunk. (See here.)

Mr See said that Dr Lam’s remarks had thus “caused ill-will and hostility between different races and communities.”

“The responses on his Facebook page show overwhelming hostility to his remark,” Mr See said in his police complaint. “Yet, he has allowed his offending words to remain online”.

He also said Dr Lam may have breached the sub judice rule, as judicial proceedings in this case were still ongoing.

In its response to Mr See, dated 3 July and some four months after the latter made the report, the Police said:

“After careful considerations of the facts and circumstances of the case, and in consultation with the Attorney-General’s Chambers, the Police have decided not to take further action for the matter.”

Mr See, speaking to The Online Citizen (TOC) on the police’s decision, said:

“I felt that Dr Lam’s remarks had promoted feelings of ill-will towards Indians and Hindus in Singapore. But the AG, after 4 months of deliberation, now states that it is okay to freely associate alcohol and unruly behaviour with  Thaipusam. I like to know if Dr Lam was ever issued a warning.”

Dr Lam’s post remains on his Facebook page. (See here.)

Lam's Facebook post
Lam’s Facebook post
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陈振声吁抓住海外机遇 余振忠提醒数因素下少有中小企业脱颖而出

在昨日的公开演说,贸工部长陈振声鼓励国人更积极进取,抓紧新加坡以外的机遇,不要只满足于我国目前所取得的成绩。 他声称政府会加大力度,引导商团协助有意进驻其他市场的本地公司,并培育一批能在区域与全球市场站稳阵脚的新一代企业。 然而,工人党前非选区议员余振忠提醒,真正的挑战在于,面对成本高、市场小,乃至于需要和官联企业或其他政府支持大型单位竞争,这些因素导致并不是很多中小企业能脱颖而出。尽管当局鼓吹企业精神,但现实就是在新加坡发展并不容易。 不鼓励分歧意见 他分析,有别于其他经济体,在新加坡的成本、社会保障薄弱,再者若失败耻辱感更强,且不太鼓励分歧意见。 “我们鼓励创造力,但是在学校,却偏好标准答案。想搞点新意思,你就要把它关掉。” 余振忠过去曾倡议更多开放空间和“沙盒创新”,允许本地初创公司为政府试用创新解决方案。然而,当前的采购心态是尽可能聘用现成的大型竞标者,这样,若项目失败,评估团队不必接受责罚,我们已惯于规避风险。 多年来政府论调也常提如何更好地组织海外业务、领导本地公司向海外扩张等。但现实情况是,我们仍然不像韩国或日本商团那样,能成群结队出征寻找机遇。 “残酷的现实世界” 余振忠也点出,其他如新加坡一样小的西方国家,尚且有国际品牌,但我们除了少数几个官联集团外,还没有真正全球化的品牌。 更何况,瞬息万变的竞争格局中,一些官联公司实则也面对严重挫败。“是的,那里是一个残酷的现实世界。”

Hairline cracks found on 11 LRT trains on Sengkang-Punggol Line in July

Hairline cracks were found on eleven first generation Light Rail Transit (LRT)…

雅加达暴乱发现神秘信封袋 印尼警方:有人蓄意煽动暴乱

印尼选委会21日凌晨正式公布大选结果,如同预期,现任总统佐科(Joko Widodo)以55.5巴仙的过半得票率打败普拉博沃(Prabowo ),成功连任。但普拉博沃拒绝接受结果,发起“选举无效”诉讼,其支持者们21日晚间更聚集在中选会总部抗议,与警方爆发严重冲突。 截至22日天亮为止,已知有六名示威者死亡——反对派民众指控警方以“实弹镇压”才会有人死亡;警方表示,现场被捕的暴民“大多不是雅加达本地人”,有者身上搜出“装满现金的同款神秘信封袋”,因此全案将朝“蓄意煽动暴乱”的方向侦查。 印尼于今年首次举办 “多合一选举”,是全世界最大规模的“单日投票选举”。投票当日印尼超过1亿9000名合格选民,于短短数小时内投下了总统票、国会票与地方议会票,夸张庞大的选务工作与票务物流,也让印尼上下“全国总动员”。 而投票截止结束后,印尼各大媒体联合出口民调,认为佐科已“笃定当选”,但反对派候选人普拉博沃,与他的保守派民粹政党“大印尼运动党”(Gerindra)并不接受结果,声称佐科利用国家机器进行“舞弊坐票”。 普拉博沃也多次宣布不承认选后结果,并誓言“必将提起选举无效之诉”,“为了印尼人民的宪政民主奋战到底!”于是选后计票的1个月内,朝野各党也都积极动员、预备著结果公布后的“政治决战”。而伊斯兰强硬派团体与普拉博沃也不认同选举结果,侗言到中选会进行抗议。 因此,印尼政府也调度了大批军警进驻首都雅加达,并透过各种管道“呼吁民众冷静”、“尊重民主的选择”,而印尼中选会为了缓冲支持者的激动情绪,竟选择在21日凌晨宣布结果。 由于目前正值“斋戒月”时期,白天仍相安无事,但到了21日晚间9点斋月晚间的特别礼拜“泰拉威”(Tarawih)过后——近千名反对选举结果的示威者,却突然成群结队地出现在雅加达市区,并朝中选会总部方向集结前进,试图突破军警隔离、闯入中选会。围绕在中选会大楼外的警民冲突,自此一夜开打。 根据雅加达省政府翌日的清点公告,21日的选举暴乱,一路持续到22日破晓——整起事件共有101名“暴乱者”被捕;冲突中有200人受伤,已知至少6人死亡。 各方政党呼吁停止暴乱,普拉博沃否认发动暴乱…

Getting away with hubris and arrogance

Andrew Loh / On 30 April, six ministers refuted allegations that the…