Sexual comment directed at Amos Yee
Sexual comment directed at Amos Yee

16-year old Amos Yee, who is spending the weekend in remand, is again the target of online comments which apparently advocate violence against him.

In particular, sexual violence.

Some of these comments rather gleefully and apparently hope Amos Yee would be raped in prison.

Amos Yee has been charged for three counts by the authorities for offending the religious sentiments of Christians, for an obscene cartoon on his blog, and for causing “distress” to some who had viewed the video Amos Yee made on the death of Singapore’s former prime minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew. The charge sheet seems to say this meant Amos Yee had harassed some of those distressed by the video.

Since being arrested and charged, Amos Yee had published a blog post asking for financial help to pay his court fees.

It was after posting this blog article that the aforementioned sexually explicit comments started to be posted by some.

These, however, is not the first time that Amos Yee has been the target of such comments.

Jason Tan, who is believed to be a grassroots leader in the Telok Blangah area, had earlier posted online – in reaction to Amos Yee’s video – the following sexually explicit threat:

Grassroots leader threat

A letter was sent to the People’s Association (PA), which oversees all grassroots organisations in Singapore, about Mr Tan’s posting. (See here.)

There has been no response from the PA thus far.

Now, similar sexually explicit threats and “wishes” have been directed at the teenager in his blog.

These are a sampling of the comments:














There are more than 650 comments on Amos Yee’s article.

Despite the hate-filled comments from Amos Yee’s detractors, there are also the more sensible and supportive ones which are disgusted at the threats made against Amos Yee.

Here are two of these comments:



According to the Singapore Legal Advice website:

“Threatening to inflict bodily injury, property damage or damage to reputation upon another may amount to criminal intimidation under section 503 of the Penal Code.”

It also says;

“Making another fearful of being hurt by you may also amount to the offence of assault under section 351 of the Penal Code.”

Under Singapore’s Protection from Harassment Act, it is clearly stipulated that any threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or making any threatening, abusive or insulting communication to another person, may be an offence.

The Act stipulates:

No person shall by any means use towards another person (referred to for the purposes of this section as the victim) any threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or make any threatening, abusive or insulting communication to another person (referred to also for the purposes of this section as the victim), either —

(a) with the intent —

(i) to cause the victim to believe that unlawful violence will be used by any person against the victim or any other person; or

(ii) to provoke the use of unlawful violence by the victim or another person against any other person; or

(b) whereby —

(i) the victim is likely to believe that such violence referred to in paragraph

(a)(i) will be used; or

(ii) it is likely that such violence referred to in paragraph (a)(ii) will be provoked.

It is unclear if the Attorney General’s Chambers or the Singapore police will look into the offending comments on Amos Yee’s blog.

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【李总理起诉梁实轩】林鼎盘问总理 多人转载为何只起诉一人

总理提告梁实轩诽谤诉讼案10月6日开审,梁实轩的代表律师林鼎在对李显龙进行交叉盘问时提到,这么多人转载有关一马舞弊案的文章,为何只起诉梁实轩一人。 李总理在接受林鼎盘问时,林鼎强调了资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)仅向梁实轩发出删除帖文的通知,而后者也依据通知行事。“这是否表示有人也在分享相关帖文,包括和梁实轩一样,分享了同样帖文的链接。” 李总理对此承认。林鼎接着问道,为何只起诉被告而不是其他人时,李总理表示他在获得律师建议后才决定这么做。“我看到人们分享这篇文章。” 对此,林鼎就询问李总理,他或其他政府机构,是否有列出分享这篇帖文的其他用户,但是李总理表示不清楚。“他们可能有这么做。这是很正常的。我个人没有列出清单,虽然我认识的几个人有这么做。” 而在被询及是谁举报梁分享帖文时,李总理表示不记得了。林鼎因此指出,鉴于针对其委托人的诽谤诉讼的严重性,李总理的理据实在是“令人难以接受”。 李总理回应道,他不记得,因为他有很多联系人和朋友经常会在脸书上和他分享事情,而这篇帖文刚好就是其中一个。 总理指资媒局未接到梁道歉 他也表示,新加坡金融管理局以及资讯通信媒体发展局所发出的通告,与他起诉梁实轩的行动无关,而且也无关政府行动。他进行提告,因为梁实轩没有向他道歉。 李总理还指出,虽然梁实轩最终删除了该含有链接的脸书帖文,也向《砂拉越报告》声称已经撤回声明,但这博客作者并没有这样做。“实际上,他采取相反的做法,在案件、诉讼程序和他的各种书面证词和口供中都发挥了很大的效用。” 李总理也认为,虽然梁实轩现在依据指示撤除帖文,但是未来他可能会再次做出类似指控,尤其是在博客未做出道歉行为的情况下。而鉴于帖文中指控的严重性,他认为有必要非常认真处理这事情,不仅因为他是政府的领导,也是为了保障个人声誉和地位。 林鼎质疑李总理“骑两匹马”,指作为公民和公共领域的总理参与此诽谤诉讼案,可能存在利益冲突时,李总理不认同有关说法,认为他有责任保护政府领导的声誉,也有权利保护自己的廉政。 “我认为我有责任这样做,因为如果我的诚信受到质疑,人们以为我和(一马公司舞弊案的)罪犯同谋,协力促成著名腐败事件,那将对我造成极大的伤害。”…

S&CC rebates worth S$134 million to be given to around 940,000 HDB households starting next month

In a press statement released on Wednesday (25 March), the Ministry of…

Almost $1m worth of contracts & purchases by 9 GROs made without following rules

The Auditor General’s Office (AGO), which released its annual audit of government…

Abuse of elderly woman – MSF looking into incident

The Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) says it is looking…