The following is the content of an email sent to the People’s Association (PA) by Mr Andrew Loh. The email, sent on 03 April 2015, asks the PA about the online posting by an alleged grassroots leader which had threatened to do physical violence on a 16-year old boy who had criticised the late Lee Kuan Yew and the Christian religion.

jasontan

The email:

Dear sir / ma’am,

I am not sure if you are aware of the incident where a reported grassroots leader from the Telok Blangah area is said to have made a public threat of physical violence against a 16-year old boy who had created and posted an online video about Lee Kuan Yew and the Christian religion.

The grassroots leader, one Jason Tan, posted on Facebook the following threat:

“For me, I would cut his dick and put in his mouth for blemish Jesus Christ”.

Pls see here:

http://www.tremeritus.com/…/grassroots-leader-threatens-to…/

http://www.tremeritus.com/…/investigations-on-filipino-edz…/

http://www.tremeritus.com/…/grassroots-leader-removes-face…/

Such a threat or remarks by a grassroots leader, and directed at a young boy of 16, is a cause of deep concern to the public. This is especially so when such a community leader is in a position of influence and authority.

To date, however, there have been no reaction from the People’s Association which, I believe, appoints all grassroots leaders to their positions.

I would therefore like to ask:

1. Is the PA aware of the incident and the threat made by Mr Tan?

2. Can the PA confirm that Mr Tan is indeed a grassroots leader under the PA?

3. What action has the PA taken with regards to this incident, if indeed any action has been taken?

3. If no action has been taken so far, will the PA be doing so? If not, could you explain why?

4. Would the PA be issuing a statement on the incident, especially to remind all grassroots leaders that such threats of physical violence are unacceptable?

5. Will the PA be getting in touch with the family of the 16-year old boy and the boy himself to assure them that Mr Tan’s conduct is not condoned by the PA?

I look forward to your prompt reply.

Thank you.

Regards,
Andrew Loh

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Online applications for qualified driving licences from 1 Oct

Members of the public who have successfully passed the Traffic Police (TP) driving…

【选举】行动党守住丹戎巴葛集选区

由行动党原贸工部长陈振声率领的英兰妮、祖安清心、陈圣辉和蔡瑞隆,成功守住丹戎巴葛集选区。 在这届选举,他们面对来自前进党团队的挑战。前进党派出刘伟伶律师、蔡德龙、孙俊伟、阿巴斯(Abas Kasmani)和哈里仕皮莱(Harish Pillay)。后者得票4万5609票。而行动党得票率63.13巴仙,得票7万8079票。 事实上行动党团队的得票率还有所下跌。 该选区有13万4642选民。

选举落幕已一个月 林绍权风波待彻查

我国2020选举在7月10日尘埃落定,距今已过了一个月之久。 当然热闹的选举少不了话题性事件,其中就包括人民行动党推出的候选人林绍权,被网民揭发实为一名“精英主义”者,在武装部队服务时“似乎高高在上”;也被嘲讽林实则“自私”、“固执”,有时还很“好练”。 尽管行动党领袖们曾试着平息此议题,包括副总理王瑞杰曾表示,当事人不妨“自己站出来澄清”。谁能料到“林绍权风波”愈演愈烈,林俨然已成为“票房毒药”,在反对声浪中,林绍权选择退选。 行动党甄选机制出问题了吗? 针对林绍权风波,建国总理李光耀之子李显扬,曾点评行动党对本身的甄选机制“感到自豪”,“不清楚他们是否真不知这些议题(网民对林绍权的指控);如果他们知道,显然没有为此做好应对准备;如果不知情,那就该忧虑遴选候选人过程是否不够全面。” 6月29日,总理曾表示,将会在大选结束后针对林绍权风波,进行彻查。 李显龙曾表示要彻查 选举期间,他表示暂不会对此事展开调查,但也不会让林绍权的名誉被网民所污蔑,让这件事永久影响他。“这对他是不公平的,也会设下先例,让网民以为他们可以通过社交媒体,抹杀一个人的名誉。” 他也指责,网络“审判”准候选人的风气不可长。 若不是因为网络民众的爆料造成轩然大波,也许林绍权能顺利参与竞选。他将随同国务资政尚达曼,上阵裕廊集选区,且有很大可能在尚达曼的高民望和胜算的加持下,顺利的入住国会。