By Howard Lee
International Press Freedom group Reporters Without Borders (RWB) has issued a media release criticising Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong for the legal action he is taking against blogger Roy Ngerng, which the organisation sais is “designed to silence whistle-blower and warn off others” from questioning the PM on Central Provident Fund issues.
RWB claims that the PM “is now trying to rush the case through the courts to prevent a full examination of the evidence” by calling for a summary judgement of the case.
The press freedom group also called for “urgent action by all netizens to support Roy Ngerng”, by circulating the original blog post made by Ngerng. RWB has shared available links to the post on its website.
It also called upon online users to support and share the I Support Roy Ngerng website, contribute to Wikipedia’s articles on Singapore’s CPF system, contribute to Ngerng’s legal defence fund, and voice support for Ngerg on his media channels and voice their displeasure with the CPF Board and on the PM’s Facebook page.
“The case brought by the prime minister against Roy Ngerng is nothing but a diversionary tactic and a deterrent,” said Benjamin Ismaïl, the head of the Reporters Without Borders Asia-Pacific Desk.
“It is based on the fact that a blogger works alone and does not benefit, for example, from the support of the news organization he works for, and on the desire to divert public attention from the scandal surrounding the Central Provident Fund, which he has written about. The disproportionate resources deployed by the prime minister shows he wants to issue a warning to all Singapore citizens who might publish any information that directly or indirectly challenges the government.”
“We urge Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong purely and simply to withdraw his case.”
RWB said that Ngerng is a victim of a method of censorship called Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP). “It is designed in the first place to deny the blogger the ability to publish or the chance to defend himself.”
SLAPP is also meant to discourage other news workers from publicising Ngerng’s writings, and is also a tactic to divert public attention from what Ngerng has uncovered. “It is a procedure designed ultimately not to win the case but to publicly exhaust the blogger psychologically, financially and physically.”
The lawsuit, in effect, caused alarm to Ngerng and forced him to issue an apology that was meant to minimise damage. “Reporters Without Borders subsequently learned that the apology was actually drafted by Lee’s lawyers and not by Ngerng, despite the repeated public references to Ngerng’s so called admission of guilt.”
RWB also took issue with PM Lee demand for Ngerng to remove further articles. It also cited the statement of endorsement by the Ministry of Health following Ngerng’s dismissal by his employer, Tan Tock Seng Hospital over the pending lawsuit with the PM, and a letter by the PM’s press secretary, Ms Chang Li Lin that criticised the Economist for a story it ran about the libel suit.
“The letter was widely criticized in online posts questioning the involvement of government officials in a private matter and, in a reference to the health ministry’s statement, voicing concern about the possibility that the government had intervened directly against Ngerng,” said RWB.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The “freak result” bogeyman

Ng E-Jay The old playbook of the People’s Action Party (PAP) has…

SRX figures: Condo units sold fell 27% as resale prices mildly increased by 1.7%

According to the flash data from real estate portal SRX Property on…

#FreeMyInternet response to Dr Yaacob Ibrahim’s statements of 4 June 2013

  By #FreeMyInternet We refer to Dr Yaacob Ibrahim’s statement today as…


(原文刊于英语媒体Medium)北雁译 为你贴上标签,哦,你是支持PMD(个人代步工具)的!你是反PMD的! 我固然不赞同一些PMD使用者的态度和行为,亦不认同仓促执行无差别式的全面禁令。 新加坡政府在保持一致性上都有亮眼记录。看看伍逸松,这位学者非常一致,作为前国防统帅,他似乎有相当好的成绩,且从未失败过。 坐沉东方海皇集团后,他继续引领新加坡报业控股,并继续维持他的辉煌纪录。 在看待PMD一事上,有者遇上了几位欠扁骑士,于是他们要求禁止。我自己就遇过那么几位没耐心的电动滑板车骑士,当我在等候巴士时对我鸣笛,甚至我在路上行驶时骑着电动滑板车超越我。我很清楚这类人是存在的,但在极短时间内就仓促下禁令,是否合理? 再来看看那些态度欠佳的“老外专才”。是的,我们能举出很多例子,甚至你可能也遇到过这么一位但是有要求禁止老外吗?政府可曾停止引进外籍人士? 莫要一竿子打翻整船人。我想大家记得宏茂桥市镇会前总经理,被控涉嫌收受承包商总值10万元贿赂的案件,但这不代表所有的行动党市镇会都是贪腐的。即便有前行动党成员以两元开设了AIM公司,以14万新元,从市镇会手中购下用百万元开发的软件所有权,但这也无法证明他们贪腐。对了, 还有荷兰-武吉班让及巴西立-榜莪市镇会,有1千200万元在投资雷曼迷你债券等投资失利,行动党也说不能怪他们。 所以,我们也不应为了工人党阿裕尼-后港市镇会诉讼风波被分化。 然我们来反思今日我们面对的问题根源: 过于拥挤和倍感压力-…