Focus on Healthcare is a five-part series that provides a critical analysis of Singapore’s healthcare system, popularly known as the 3M system (MediShield, Medisave, Medifund). Through it, we hope to provide an understanding of how healthcare financing is currently being funded and used in Singapore, and explore the ways in which this can be further enhanced to cater for the needs of Singaporeans.

In this article, the fifth and final part of our analysis, we examine the consequences of a high out-of-pocket expenditure rate for healthcare.

 

By Leong Sze Hian and Roy Ngerng

Our analysis in previous parts has indicated that the Singapore government is under-spending on healthcare, compared to what citizens pay out of pocket. Compared to other developed nations, Singapore can do a lot more in helping citizens finance their healthcare needs.

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), high out-of-pocket expenditure on healthcare poses significant challenges, such that there is “restricted physical and financial access by the poor” and the healthcare system becomes “extremely inequitable”.

chart1_part5

If we rank developed countries according to their Gini-coefficient (income inequality), Singapore ranks the highest. As such, having citizens pay more out-of-pocket expenses for their healthcare needs would only exacerbate our already high levels of income disparity.

chart2_part5

The UBS Prices and Earnings report in 2011 had ranked Singapore as having the lowest wages among the developed countries, and the wages of Singaporeans have stagnated over the past decade. According to Global MetroMonitor 2011, the wages of Singaporeans have grown the slowest compared to 200 other countries.

chart3_part5

This could have serious impact on our healthcare needs, as we pay a much higher out-of-pocket rate than other developed countries.

If we compare the change in the out-of-pocket expenditure over the years, we can see that they have also grown faster than how much Singaporeans’ nominal wages have changed (data from the Ministry of Manpower).

In other words, Singaporeans might be paying more and more for healthcare, but they might not be earning as much to cover the increasing costs.

chart4_part5

 

 

chart5_part5

According to the WHO, “analysis of data from nearly 80 countries reveals a strong correlation between out-of-pocket spending as a share of total health spending and the percentage of families that face catastrophic health expenditure.”

WHO defines “catastrophic health expenditure” as treatments that cost much higher in relation to income, such that “it results in “financial catastrophe” for the individual or the household. Such high expenditure can mean that people have to cut down on necessities such as food and clothing, or are unable to pay for their children’s education.

Furthermore, “many people may decide not to use services, simply because they cannot afford either the direct costs, such as for consultations, medicines and laboratory tests, or the indirect costs, such as for transport and special food. Poor households are likely to sink even further into poverty because of the adverse effects of illness on their earnings and general welfare.”

The signs are not good for Singaporeans.

The burden of healthcare costs is actually most heavily shouldered by the lowest income group.

For the poorest 20% in Singapore, they have to spend 6% of their incomes on healthcare, whereas the richest 20% only need to spend 4.8% (data from the Ministry of Health).

This is not forgetting that for the highest-income earner, because they do not need to pay 20% of all their incomes to CPF, they would be paying an even overall lower proportion on healthcare than the lower-income earner.

chart6_part5

For the lowest income earners who have seen their real wages drop since 2000, are we creating an over-burden and unnecessary stress on the poor?

How many Singaporeans have chosen to not see the doctor because they cannot afford to do so? How many Singaporeans delayed their treatment only to develop chronic illnesses down the road and risk incurring catastrophic health expenditure?

Does the government capture these statistics to assess the rate of under-consumption? In fact, how does the government support its claim that Singapore’s system prevents over-consumption? What are the statistics to prove this?

As Tania Ng from the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy had said, “The Singapore government touts having universal health coverage, however this remains disputable as the co-payment element of the healthcare financing system has posed barriers for the low-income into seeking healthcare. The out-of-pocket expenditure as a share of private expenditure is substantial in Singapore, and the figure was 84.8 per cent in 2010. The co-payment policy was intended to prevent moral hazard and curtail wastage. But it has become an inhibition to the poor seeking medical treatment or rehabilitation, leading to over-rationing of medical resources to patients who are truly in need of them. This has been deemed detrimental to the health status of the poor as they delay medical treatment and spiral into more critical conditions; or medical rehabilitation that is pivotal to a full recovery is not sought and patients relapse.”

Over-consumption cannot be taken as a de-facto excuse, when we are in all likelihood facing a situation of under-consumption.

Singapore is facing higher income inequality, with fewer able to afford basic healthcare. The 3M system is not adequately covering all healthcare needs, and with higher out-of-pocket expenditure, more Singaporeans are likely to defer early detection and treatment of potentially catastrophic illnesses. 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

M Ravi: Lawyers in S’pore must collectively “recover” rights to carry out duties without intimidation

Lawyers in Singapore must collectively “recover” their rights to carry out their…

年长者坐轮椅够不着水槽取水不便 社工轰死板条规剥夺年长者生活自主

住在乐龄公寓的一名年长者,因必须坐轮椅,要使用普通高度的水槽,开水龙头取水就十分不便。 然而, 根据建屋局规定,如果要装修降低水槽高度,在屋契到期(或住户逝世),还要回归原样,大约就要花费八千元。社工叶静慧对于这种死板不懂变通的建屋局条规就感到非常不合理,质问为何无法弹性变通,方便行动不便的老人家,也有能力独立生活。 叶静慧在脸书分享,一名住在乐龄公寓,坐轮椅的年长者够不到厨房水槽,因此平日要盛水煮水,都很不方便。要喝水的话,只能拿社工或看护者在逢周二和周四装的水。 “如果周末时想拿些热水的话,这名老人家还要特地到楼下的咖啡店买。” 她说,老人家不可能负担得起八千元,来重新装修降低厨房水槽,而且在归还公寓时还要回归原样。“拜托,这是乐龄公寓!”叶静慧对于死板的建屋局规则感到愤怒,认为这形同剥夺了老人家生活自主的能力。 五天需喝社工储备的水 叶静慧认为,乐龄公寓却无法应对轮椅使用者的需求,这是很荒谬的。“你可想象有五天你必须喝同样的水,而且不能随意泡茶泡咖啡吗?正因为那些条规,老人家的家园才为她带来困难!” 她续而质问,有多少体弱老人独自受苦?何以我们要继续忽视他们?而正是我们的冷漠忽略,让这些老人家被贴上导致看护成本高涨的因素。 “难道是因为他们穷吗?乐龄保健是很复杂的,需要全方位的探讨。我们以智慧国为荣,且炫耀可以推出建国一代配套,但是贫困体弱的人,却没有发言权,继续承受着不必要的痛苦。” 为此,她呼吁制定政策这和国会,应该正视这些问题,必须进行政策和结构的改革,把尊严和生活自主还给这些老人家。“如果这些原因还不足,那么再想想我们必须减轻长期看护的成本。” 叶静慧在贴文中也感谢热心人士提供各种建设性意见,“我知道还有很多在基层付出的社工也在积极争取,希望政策制定者能听见社工们的心声,作出改变。感谢大家。”…

ICA detected 1,750 cartons of contraband cigarettes smuggled in a cargo of assorted vegetables

The Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) officers found 1,750 cartons of duty-unpaid…

Singapore: Space Narrows for Online News Media 

Government Control Grows as More Websites Must Get Onerous Licenses (Bangkok, October 16,…