Amidst the number of future initiatives unveiled by PM Lee Hsien Loong during his National Day Rally speech was the plan to upgrade Changi Airport.

Besides the building of two new terminals, the literal jewel in the crown would be the new gardens built at the current carpark site next to Terminal 1.

In his speech, PM Lee credited his father, former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, for having the foresight to move the civilian airport from its previous location in Paya Lebar to Changi, where the airport has since thrived and become internationally renowned.

PM Lee said:

“And we have Changi Airport today because in the 1970s, forty years ago, Mr Lee Kuan Yew had the vision to imagine the old RAF Changi Airbase becoming an international airport to replace Paya Lebar and he pushed for it against the advice of experts who recommended expanding Paya Lebar, building a second runway in Paya Lebar. Can you imagine? One runway in Paya Lebar, already aeroplanes coming in and going out over so many houses. (What more) two runways in Paya Lebar?

“But Mr Lee said no, study, study, study again. Got Howe Yoon Choon [sic] to lead it who pushed it and made it happened. And I think we owe it to them and we are grateful to them.”

This statement applauding the senior Lee’s foresight must have reinforced his position as the visionary leader and father of modern Singapore. While his many contributions to the development of modern day Singapore are without a doubt invaluable, I was unsure if moving the airport from Paya Lebar to Changi was his brainchild, and that Howe Yoon Choong, the former Defence Minister, was merely taking instructions from Mr Lee.

Mr Howe’s pivotal role in the matter was reiterated and honoured in 2012 and 2013, by a minister and by the Changi Airpot Group, respectively.

In a speech – in May 2013 – by former minister Lim Boon Heng at the 5th Howe Yoon Chong PSA Scholarship Award Ceremony, he lauds Mr How Yoon Choong as a decisive man who worked based on strong convictions:

“Mr Howe Yoon Chong also played a pivotal role in the development of Changi Airport.

“Back in 1975, Mr Howe had the foresight to push for a new airport to be built at Changi rather than to follow expert opinion to expand the existing airport at Paya Lebar with a second runway. The land at Changi was reclaimed from the sea, an international terminal built from scratch, and the new airport began operations on schedule in July 1981.

“Again, the younger generation of Singaporeans will face this kind of decisions to be made, whether to make that move, because it’s a lot of money, and if that move proves wrong, you lose a lot of money. But Mr Howe was certain that it was right and he pushed for it and he convinced then-Prime Minister Mr Lee Kuan Yew.And from personal experience, if anybody wants to convince Mr Lee Kuan Yew, you’ve got to be very strong in your convictions and sure of yourself.”

So, according to Mr Lim’s version of the story, it was Mr Howe who should be credited with having the foresight to move the airport to Changi from Paya Lebar. Mr Lee Kuan Yew, in fact, did not seem to be for the idea and apparently had to be convinced otherwise.

Mr Howe’s pioneering role in the matter was also honoured in 2012 by the Changi Airport Group, when it launched the CAG-Howe Yoon Chong (CAG-HYC) Book Prize, a support programme under the Changi Foundation.

The Group’s press release said:

“As we mark the completion of the upgrading for T1, we fondly remember Mr Howe, a pioneer of Changi, for his spirit of true grit in surmounting difficult and challenging circumstances.  Despite the views of experts, Mr Howe determined that Changi Airport was doable within the timeframe set.  As it turned out, his assessment proved to be an astute and accurate one.”

What transpired and who actually was responsible for the establishment of Changi Aiport is a confounding one, given the apparent different accounts.

What is perhaps certain is that Mr Howe played a more pivotal role than just taking instructions from Mr Lee Kuan Yew to “study, study, study again.” Mr Howe, in fact, pushed for the airport to be moved to Changi.

This then raises a number of questions: Have we Singaporeans become conditioned to credit Mr Lee Kuan Yew for every Singaporean success story by default, neglecting the efforts of the rest of the old guard? Are we taking everything our national leaders say to be infallible and always accurate?

Perhaps historians could shed some further light on how Changi Airport came about?

“Whether we have been extravagant in investing in an airport of this size and level of sophistication is a question worthy of a rhetorical rejoinder. Can Singapore ever afford not to have such an airport?”
Howe Yoon Chong, then Minister of Defence on the official opening of Changi Airport on in1981.

This article was contributed via the Readers’ Contribution under the moniker “Tau Huay”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Law and Home Affairs Minister shares distasteful post from fellow MP at Nee Soon GRC

Law and Home Affairs Minister received flak from netizens after he shared…

Roy Ngerng files defence – restitutions demands met, no case for defamation

By Andrew Loh Mr Lee Hsien Loong cannot make a claim of…

Places of worship, bars, nightclubs and cultural venues will need to convince authorities before reopening, says Gan Kim Yong

Places of worship, cultural venues, and public entertainment establishments will need to…

文礼当铺劫案变装匪今面控

文礼当铺劫案嫌犯今早面控,名为谢赫莫哈末拉赞的孟加拉籍建筑工人,涉嫌在上周六(28日),企图打劫文礼地铁站外的方圆当(ValueMax),今日在法庭被控企图持械抢劫和展示仿制军火罪。 法庭资料显示,被告当时向当铺经理展示一把21公分菜刀,以及黑色疑似手枪的物件。警方则指出,嫌犯抢劫未遂,曾恫言要炸掉当铺。 29岁的嫌犯自去年12月起,就在本地逾期逗留。其实际犯罪动机仍在调查中。在7月28日当天下午4时许,嫌犯走进上述地点当铺,拿出刀和假手枪,威胁当铺职员交出财物。当时他头上包着粉红色头巾作掩饰。 职员拒绝就范,嫌犯便恫言要炸掉当铺,把一个疑似炸弹的物品丢在柜台,没有盗取任何财物就逃离现场。职员立即把物品丢出店外并报警。 嫌犯干案后逃离现场,立即变装,将原有干案器械、头巾和衣物,装进黑色背包丢在裕廊西一组屋单位的盆栽后面。该单位住户在案发三小时后发现背包并报警处理。 据警方调查,嫌犯干案用的仿制手枪不再背包里,目前仍在搜寻。假枪乃用塑料组装。至于疑似炸弹的物品,也只是些电子零件。 警方直至本月1日傍晚7电,在马士吉街苏丹回教堂捕获嫌犯。 警方在昨日押嫌犯前往案发现场取证,协助调查。 不过,在法庭上嫌犯却声称自己当天喝醉了,坚称没有出示刀子和手枪,只是向职员展示炸弹。法官下令继续还押嫌犯,直到本月10日再过堂。 企图持械抢劫,一旦罪成被告可被判坐牢两年至七年,以及至少12下鞭刑。展示仿制军火指控罪成,则可悲监禁十年,和至少三下鞭刑。