By Jen

The  pro-MIW camp and some Ministers here like to diss and dismiss Singaporeans who air their concerns vocally about socio-political issues as being anti-government and daft idiots who don’t understand what is best for the country.

Well, I wonder what they will call expats and new citizens who do likewise (complain about the same things that is)? In recent months, I have been hearing some of my expat friends complain that there are too many foreigners in Singapore! Yes, it’s ironic isn’t it?  

And I have heard many complain about the high cost of living here with some of them even posting pictures on their Facebook of products that cost more here than those back in their home countries.

And on the Internet we have foreigners such as a PRC student, who lives here, questioning if she is in Singapore or China as everywhere she turns these days she hears the voices and accents of her countrymen!

And today, The Straits Times Forum published a letter by a new citizen Kenneth Ling who surprised many people (especially the government, I bet) with his sharp criticisms about Singapore going down the wrong path.

Kenneth wrote: “I even became a Singapore citizen in 2008 as I regarded this country as home. However, in the past five years, there has been a remarkable shift in the opposite direction, which does not bode well for the long-term future of Singapore. In fact, if this trend continues, many of the desirable talent Singapore worked so hard to attract and cultivate – citizens as well as foreigners – will think of leaving.”

He went on to share his observations of what is wrong with the way Singapore is being governed… “To me, the Government has chosen the path of monetary and materialistic emphasis, plus enhancing its global image, over its citizens’ quality of life."

The surge in population, which strains infrastructure; rising costs as people compete for jobs, goods and services; and the emphasis on casinos and wealthy foreigners to drive growth, all impress on young people the need to increase their material wealth, and they are then trapped in a rat race to achieve this.”

“A social imbalance emerges, with accompanying behavioural consequences that are hard to reverse now. When you add poor planning, and one-dimensional solutions focused mainly on financial outcomes, things may worsen in the coming years. It is too shallow and unstable a platform for long-term viability,” added Kenneth.

Everything that this new citizen said is not new as these are all very valid issues and concerns which numerous Singaporeans have raised and which this government stoutly tries to defend all the time, whenever they can, at all sorts of public forums and even at community functions.

What is new however is that this is the first time a new citizen has spoken up so publicly about these issues in the mainstream media.

Perhaps, what the “old” locals failed to do in getting the Government to take our complaints seriously, the new citizens and foreigners will succeed in shaking them up to do some deep self-reflection. After all, if  our authorities go all out to attract them here, they will surely want to keep them happy and not turn off future potential foreign talents right?

What our government has failed to realise is that foreign talents and new citizens are human too just like the locals. Many of them share the universal principles of living life as decent human beings and they value the intangibles in life. They too want comfort and space and do not appreciate overcrowding. Nor do they feel at home in a country that is constantly in a state of unsettling flux and packed to the gills with a constant stream of foreigners.

I am beginning to wonder if our government has bitten off more than it can chew. They have shown that they can plan and implement new things like building infrastructure but just how good or poor are they in running a country, in long-term planning and in understanding human nature and the extent of the social impact of their policies?

Just look at the poorly anticipated overcrowding issues and the incessant public transport problems including the debacle over the handling of the recent MRT breakdowns. Many of the problems could have been avoided with a big dose of common sense, empowerment, pro-active actions and meticulous long-term planning.

Technocrats, as we know, are good at planning and executing but we need more than that. We need genuine and humane talents in government with both macro and micro abilities to plan for a liveable country and a happy populace.

Running a country is much more than about building roads and iconic structures like Marina Bay Sands and Gardens by the Bay, it is also much more than growing the economy, creating jobs and filling jobs.

But most of all, good government is not about expanding and protecting the controlling party’s power base. Party should never ever come before the people and the nation. And something’s got to change if the priority is wrong.

The autocratic control of the people by the government, the relentless pursuit of wealth, materialism, the growing and blatant elitism, kiasuism, rising stress levels starting from student days, the growing over-competitiveness (even among students in branded JCs and local universities), overcrowding, rising crime  levels, constant destruction of beloved historical landmarks, increased racism and race enclaves and the increasingly high cost of living are issues weighing heavily on our minds these days.

And they are also troubling the expats and new citiizens as all these things add up to have a negative impact on the quality of life.

Many of us believe the time has come for our government to step off their high horse and to listen hard to the people. They should share in Our Vision of what we want for our country instead of forcing us to buy into their GDP-driven vision which is causing us increasing stress and pain.

Yes Ministers, despite what you think, it is not about improving your ministries’ communications and doing more hardsell of your policies. And it’s not about trying to “educate” us from young to “understand” what you are trying to do for the country. Can you try to understand us instead and what we really want? We just want to be happy and to feel proud of being a Singaporean.

And if you don’t know by now what will make the people of this country happy and what will make us truly proud of this country, then maybe you should search your conscience and ask if you are in the right job.

Will they listen to us locals? Well, if they don’t, maybe they will listen to what new citizens like Kenneth have to say about what will happen if things don’t improve in Singapore: “Ater all, when the level of frustration, high cost of living, crime, corruption and unhappiness reach the levels seen in New York, Sydney or other global cities, one might as well go to these places to live.”  Are you listening sir?

TOC thanks Jen for her contribution, this article first appeared on Jentrified Citizen.

You May Also Like

调查显示:八成年轻人认为未来面临养父母、子女巨大压力

保险公司职总英康(NTUC Company)调查显示,约94巴仙的35至55岁的“三明治一代”(Sandwich Generation)正面临养育孩子和照顾父母的经济压力,并相信未来自己的小孩与孙子亦会困在同样的循环中,成为新的“三明治一代” 三明治一代通常指上要照顾老人,下需抚养子女负担沉重的中年人。他们通常是30-45岁之间的亚洲中年人,“上有老,下有小”的这批人,因被夹在中间的困境,所以被誉为三明治一代。 此外,八成的年轻人(约21-29岁)亦认为自己将会迈入成为“三明治一代“,其主要原因源于平均寿命延长、自己对退休父母的养育责任以及养老金不足的现况。事实上,他们的父母也和他们有如出一撤的想法,有34巴仙的受试者父母认为孩子能够在年老时经济上支援他们,也承认他们很有可能踏上同样的脚步,成为新一代的三明治年龄层。 而大部分的年轻人则认同父母应该及早为自己的退休生活做准备,还有一半的年轻人则担心父母在退休需要依靠他们生活,因此他们认为至少在退休阶段能够维持与孩子的独立经济。 报告亦指出,每5位父母中,已有3位已为自己的退休生活做准备,尽管如此,在这些父母中,近六成的父母却没有为自己的退休生活准备至82岁。目前新加坡的平均寿命已达82岁。 但有趣的是,尽管年轻一代认为自己会陷入三明治的困境中,但觉得自己是可以避免陷入其中,45巴仙的年轻人仍愿意和父母讨论退休事宜,但只有16巴仙的人是真正和父母沟通退休后的生活。 孩子宁付出巨大的牺牲,避免自己成为三明治的后代 另一项比较极端的结果则是,由于三明治一代的影响,新加坡年轻人除了选择作更多财务投资以外,也会选择如不婚或不生小孩,避免自己成为三明治的后代。 职总英康市场总监Marcus Chew透露,“调查结果显示,孩子愿意付出巨大的牺牲来成全年迈父母的老年退休生活,这也反映出当今社会已将孝道的根植于每个人心中,同时也看见目前的经济投资规划是如何带给下一代深刻的影响,因此退休计划并非只是给自己,更是关系到你的后代,如果我们能够及时作出改变,我们的孩子或许就能冲破“三明治一代”的困境。”

MND minister declines to comment on CPF protest incident

The Minister for National Development, Khaw Boon Wan, has declined to comment…

Bus catches fire at junction of Portsdown Road and one-north Gateway

A bus caught fire at the junction of Portsdown Road and one-north…

莱佛士之家幼园发通告 二孩童母亲确诊感染武汉冠病

三一基督徒中心周三发文告指出,巴耶利峇莱佛士之家幼儿园(Raffles House Preschool)两名孩子的母亲,已经被确诊感染上武汉冠状病毒(Covid-19)。 在网上流传的通告指出,有关的三一基督徒中心成员已经获得新加坡卫生局确认,是一名确诊病患。 该中心指出,病患于2月12日最后一次出现在莱佛士之家幼儿园,当时她并未出现任何疫情症状。 三一基督徒中心主任牧師楊德文指出,两个孩子于2月17日到幼儿园上学时,状况良好,目前和家人一起被勒令进行14天的居家隔离中,并没有参与基督徒中心的活动。 据《新加坡雅虎》报导指出,周三早上在莱佛士之家幼儿园传出一个消息,指确诊母亲曾经在2月12日下午抵达幼儿园的接待处移交物件,并于下午4时左右离开学校。 通告写道,“2月17日,两名孩子在幼儿园和家中的状况都良好。我们和家人保持密切联系,并且关注两名孩子的健康状况”。 幼儿园等活动持续运作 据悉,有关的幼儿园仍然继续运作,并且每天为儿童和教职员进行三次体温检测。 幼儿园管理层也在信息中鼓励学生,若身体有不适就应该在家中休养,而他们会向父母跟新消息。“我们想所有父母保证,会继续采取措施,以保障所有学童和教职员的健康。我们期许获得你们的支持,祝愿受影响的家庭尽早康复,我们也会在这段时间提供所需的支持和指导。” 在通告传出当天,幼儿园和其公共范围都展开了彻底的清洁和消毒行动。…