~by Kenneth Jeyaretnam ~

This is my comment on the attempted action by the Law Society of Singapore against Lawyer M Ravi which I witnessed in court today.

When I ran my Hedge Fund I had a “global” remit meaning that I had permission to trade on any and every stock exchange. Potential Investors would usually query that, asking whether I would really take a position in any country. My answer was that I would only invest in trades originating in Nations where there was a legal framework that I was familiar with ( UK or US model) and where there was also demonstrable ’Rule of Law’. Although I had legal consultants on retainer for the details, I needed those basic pre conditions before I would consider a position.

There has never been any doubt that Singapore and its courts score high on ‘The Rule of Law’ and control of corruption indicators certainlykas scored by institutions such as The World Bank’. However as a report by Lawyer’s Rights Watch of Canada said,

“Notably, though, the definition of the World Bank’s rule of law indicator focuses on the predictability of rules with respect to economic interactions, and importantly, the extent to which contractual and property rights are protected.”

So as a Hedge Fund, a commercial entity, I was satisfied tha4 I could rely on Rule of Law to protect my investors’ monies.

The real question is, can individuals and particularly those individuals going up against the PAP have a similar confidence in the Rule of Law?

Everyone agrees that Independence of the Judiciary is the cornerstone of The Rule of Law. In other words, can we rely on independence of the judiciary when it comes to cases by individuals who are taking a stand that will be unpopular with the PAP government?

Let us be clear. Independence of the Judiciary is not the same as impartiality of the judges. There is a detailed document by Lawyer’s Rights Watch of Canada on Singapore’s Legal independence and I recommend it as essential reading. But here are a few key factors taken from the report.

  • Impartiality is the state of mind of the judge whereas Independence of the Judiciary is the status or relationship of the judicial branch to the other branches of government.
  • Judicial independence comprises both an individual and an institutional component.
  • The individual dimension relates to the independence of the particular judge. The institutional dimension relates to the independence of the court on which the judge sits
  • Courts must be independent from all other participants in the justice system.
  • Therefore the essence of judicial independence is that the “relationship between the judiciary and other branches of government be de-politicized.
  • An individual judge may exhibit the essential conditions of judicial independence but if the court over which he or she presides is not independent of the other branches of government, then he or she cannot be said to be an independent tribunal.

You can read the report here.

Tomorrow at 9:00 am I will be in Court for the first step in my own case. I am pleading this case, which I feel is essential to all Singaporeans, as an individual. And there is no doubt that it is a case which will be very unpopular with the PAP.

Coincidentally, I was in court today to support M Ravi and Madame Villema . Whilst there I witnessed an event that allowed me to get close up and personal with the issues relating to independence of the judiciary. Although the best action was removed to chambers, my basic understanding is that some gentlemen from Singapore’s Law Society tried to get M Ravi taken off the case (or disbarred?) by revealing details of a medical condition. It was all over in minutes and I believe the judge basically told them to get lost- I hope in Latin. I believe he said something along the lines that M Ravi has a certificate to practise law and that was the end of it.

I am now satisfied from my own personal experience that the Rule of Law and independence of the judiciary both on the institutional and the individual dimension is upheld. However the Law Society, if indeed this action was prompted by them, has acted disgracefully and so has the medical professional who released confidential medical information. Let us hope that the medical council deals with him in a manner that sufficiently demonstrates their independence.

M Ravi is a true hero. Not only is he working on the by-election case and my case but he continues unabated on his work for death row inmates. Who else would take on all this work pro-bono? He needs all our support right now as does Madame Villema who is under great pressure from many sides.

Tomorrow promises to be an interesting day. Are we to expect more dirty tricks?

This article first appeared on Kenneth Jeyaretnam's blog here.

You May Also Like

Raffles Hall Association Alumni forum “closed to public” after outcry over sudden change of speakers

In the aftermath of public outcry over the abrupt change of speakers…

少年旅爱心礼物活动 欢迎民众捐赠清真罐头方便面

少年旅爱心礼物活动(BBSG)慈善计划,还有一周就要结束了,主办方呼吁公众捐赠更多清真罐头食品和方便面,以便达到预期目标。 主办方于周五(13日)发文告指出,随着周三的食品捐赠和收集结束后,目前所获得清真罐头食品达到目标的54巴仙,而方便面则达到了60巴仙。 当局欢迎善心人士捐赠的清真罐头食品,包括罐头金枪鱼、玉米粒、咖喱、仁当和蘑菇等。 当局指出,根据志愿者反馈,发现罐头食品和方便面因更容易准备,而成为对受惠者来说,更有用和必需的捐赠品。 “BBSG鼓励公众参与最后一环的捐赠活动,在散播佳节欢乐气氛的同事也帮助社区中的弱势群体。” 今年预计有3万3931人将获得BBSG赠送的食品篮,内含有基本食品和简易食品。 有意参与食品捐赠的民众,可以将捐赠物品交到12个收集点,即武吉知马广场、碧山8号交叉口、勿洛购物广场、淡滨尼购物广场或大巴窑组屋中心的职总平价合作社,以及宏茂桥中心、后港第1购物商场、裕廊坊购物中心、实龙岗NEX购物中心、嘉龙威购物中心、裕廊东JEM购物中心,以及裕群仓储会员店的平价Xtra霸级市场(FairPrice Xtra)。 民众也能透过职总平价合作社的网络专页,购买价值20元、50元、或80元的家庭礼篮,也可透过扫描每天在收集点分发的硬币罐上的二维码,经由PayNow程序进行捐款。 民众也可以参与自本月9日开始至28日,在少年旅总部进行的日常礼物篮派送活动。有关活动在公共假日前夕及假日当天没进行。 每天的礼篮派送活动分三个阶段进行,分别为上午11时、下午1时和3时,每个时段都需要10辆车子。当局促请所有志愿者到该网站专页 www.bbshare.sg…

总理多次鼓励“造人”增加人口 惟年轻国人为养儿育女成本头痛

《今日报》报导,本月10日,总理李显龙在出席新加坡日本商工会议所50周年对话会上,曾表示新加坡人口目前应该可以再增加。 他表示,“我们为新加坡制定了许多合适的措施,包括在建设新产业、学校、机会、市镇、公园等,我们都一直致力为下一代打造新社会,但我们现在最需要的是“新人民”-我们的子女儿孙。” 他透露,我国每年约3万5000人出生,以及3万5000名登记成为永久居民,而在众多永久居民中,高达两万人是成为新加坡公民。换言之,约5万5000人中,有36巴仙是移民者。 然而他表示,若出生率在近四至五年内没有成长,我国人口可能就开始面临下滑的问题。 三分一青年30岁前不婚? 其中的原因为,约三分之一的迈向30岁的青年均选择不婚,因为他们需要将焦点聚焦在他们的事业上,许多青年认为他们需要在婚前有更多积蓄,以确保减少婚期及婚后生活压力,包括办理酒席、房子、装修与孩子的养育费用。 李显龙也表示,新加坡目前也试图协助上班族母亲育儿,透过设置工作的灵活度与建立婴儿照护、日托等建设,使母亲能够在分娩后重返工作岗位。 “若他们计划生孩子,他们一定会考量孩子对职业的影响以及孩子的养育责任,许多母亲也会这么做,所以我也能理解,这并不容易实现。“ 当然,这也不是总理第一次鼓励年轻国人“努力造人”。不管是2014年的新年贺词,或是最近一次在公开场合,他都鼓励国人多生育,认为新加坡在教育、医疗和住房等完善设施和良好环境,并强调这是国人完全可以担起的责任。 想生就生?养孩子并不简单 然而, 对于年轻父母来说养育孩子也并非易事,高昂的养育费用往往让夫妻吃不消。…

Singapore Literature Prize judges resign over NLB's book removal

By Howard Lee A number of judges for the Singapore Literature Prize…