~ by Lewis Loh ~
After watching the news on TV about the NParks’s Brompton bicycles purchase, I had more serious questions about this particular company that won the tender as well as the tender itself.
Disclaimer – I am not questioning the model selection as I know the quality of a Brompton bicycles. Besides the tender process, I just have these key questions and observations regarding the eventual winner of this tender, a company known as BikeHop.
The mystery of BikeHop
Is BikeHop a bicycle shop, a tour agency, or an online shop? I cannot figure this out.
Their registered address is a terrace house in a residential area at Siak Kew Ave (Potong Pasir area). It neither operate as a brick and mortar bicycle shop nor does it apparently have any links online to sell bicycles. The issue of whether they can provide actual technical/mechanical support and assistance is questionable.
Brompton’s authorised distributor and their network of dealers in Singapore offer a standard 5 year warranty on frames and 2 year on parts, far exceeding the tender requirements! All this for only S$50 more than the winning bid.
Also, I noticed that there are strict regulations pertaining to registering a company as a tour agency. BikeHop’s website and YouTube channel seem to portray themselves as a tour agency conducting tours in Singapore and overseas.

Besides doing the usual procedures of company registration with a key executive and directors, they must also fulfil these three important criteria.
1. Paid-up Capital – The company must have paid-up capital of at least S$100,000.
2. Email Address and TRUST – The company must have a website to operate the business. The company must also observe the “Terms and Conditions for the Use of the Travel Related Users’ System (TRUST)”. The TRUST website is a state-sanctioned website that provides relevant information, resources and advice related to the travel industry in Singapore.
I went to the TRUST website and searched for the company BikeHop and they were not listed there. Either they are not a registered tour agency or have not updated their information.
However, TRUST lists all the up to date information on all licensed travel and tour agents in Singapore, but judging from their videos and website, the company has at least been around for a year?
3. Office Space and Signboard – the company must set up a business office dedicated solely to travel agency operations. The space cannot be shared with any other type of business. An easily visible signboard that reflects the nature your business must be erected. If you are an individual freelance travel agent conducting business from home, in either an HDB flat or private accommodation, you must obtain approval from the Housing Development Board or Urban Redevelopment Authority before the STB will give you your license.
I don’t seem to recall having seen any tour agency operating from the terrace house in Siak Kew Avenue and since a tour agency cannot be shared with any other type of business, the question again I ask, are they a bicycle shop or a tour agency?
Questioning the tender process
Besides the information listed in the tender, I also noticed was this particular tender was drawn up on 19 Jan 2012, the day before Chinese New Year, and put up on the GeBIZ site on 3rd day of Chinese New Year (25 Jan 2012)?

If I wanted to place an open tender bidding, I would want maximum exposure throughout the particular industry for them to have time to come up with their offers.

Which bicycle shop do you know in Singapore opens on 3rd day of Chinese New Year and will scan the GeBIZ website to come across a tender that expires in a few days’ time? No wonder Brompton’s official distributor in Singapore and local dealer networks knew nothing about the NParks tender!
Even if the official distributor submitted a bid, they could still be beaten by their own dealer networks as the official distributor is under obligation not to undercut their retailer networks.
The irony of this situation is that NParks could have got their Brompton bicycles much cheaper and WITH full warranty, mechanical and technical support!
The points I have brought up point towards the fact that obtaining the Brompton bicycles from BikeHop Singapore was not the best deal by far.
Transparency and answers needed
In summary, the tender seemed to be timed in such a way to minimise exposure to the cycling industry (drawn up one day before Chinese New Year and put up on the GeBIZ site on 3rd day of Chinese New Year) and the legitimacy of the company, that won the tender as a bicycle shop, is questionable at best.
The full details of the tender can be found here.
My $0.02 without GST.
TOC thanks Lewis for allowing us to reproduce his article, which first appeared here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

港立法会外爆冲突警驱赶 林郑月娥称“有组织暴动”

香港群众为防堵“送中条例”修法在今日通过二读,聚集立法会外。但在下午约三时许警民爆发冲突,演变成流血骚乱,2014年“占中”景象重演。 据了解,由于集会群众不满政府仍未撤回上述修法而不肯离去。民间人权阵线发言人岑子傑表示,只有行政長官林郑月娥宣布撤回修法,集会才会结束。 不过约下午三时有示威者冲击警方防线,高喊“撤回”口号。警方则多次发射催泪弹、橡胶子弹和布袋弹,以及催泪喷剂等驱赶立法会周边的示威者,群众立即走避,但不少人转移阵地,占领周边添华道、夏悫道等道路。也有群众退往中环方向。 香港警务处处长卢伟聪谴责示威者行为不负责任“做法危险,可以杀人”,形容金钟一代废除混乱,由于防线被冲击,唯有用武器阻止“暴徒”。警方也呼吁当地民众切勿进入金钟一带。 不过民间人权阵线则强烈谴责警方以催泪弹、布袋弹和橡胶子弹攻击示威者,导致多人受伤甚至昏迷,并重申港人“没有骚乱”。而大部分示威者手无寸铁,仅有头盔、护目镜或手套等配备。 林郑月娥定义集会为“暴动” 另一方面,林郑月娥批评示威者破坏社会安宁、罔顾法纪,并指现场状况不是和平集会,而是公然、有组织地发动“暴动”。他指今早有人不顾市民安危,占据和堵塞马路、瘫痪交通,严重影响社会运作,以及多次冲击警方防线和作出危险可致命行为,包括放火、用削尖铁支和丢砖块攻击警察。 她也指每当有涉及中央与特区、内地和香港的议题,都会被部分人士挑起矛盾和纷争。 她也接受香港无线电视访问,并表示“说我卖港?我怎样卖港?我是这儿土生土长,与所有香港人一起成长,我对于这个地方的爱,令我作出不少个人牺牲”,一度哽咽。 不过,也有一些示威者抨击林郑月娥“失心疯”,也不认同林郑月娥说法。 香港地铁也依照警方要求,在晚上8时30分关闭金钟站。至晚上9时30分截稿为止,警方仍手持长盾,与在夏悫道设下路障的群众对峙,预料将有另一轮清场。

World Economic Forum in Singapore cancelled due to uncertainties caused by COVID pandemic

The World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Special Annual Meeting in Singapore has been…

醉酒洋汉殴打商场保安 被判监禁一周

今年4月,因找不到商场出口而迁怒商场保安的洋汉,涉及蓄意伤人与抵触防止骚扰法令两项罪名,昨日(23日)被法院裁定监禁一周。 被告米尔斯(Stuart Mills)是我国永久居民,今年4月4日,在东海岸乐路乐斯广场(Roxy Square)凌晨12点左右,与受害者保安林清福发生争执,甚至挥拳将保安打倒在地,导致林清福右眼红肿、脖子扭伤,而被告在打完后随之逃之夭夭。 据当天案情显示,被告在和朋友喝了酒后,打算离开商场,但由于已凌晨,找不到出口,便向保安林清福反映,林清福向他解释入夜后大部分商场出口已关闭,但仍有三个出口,他也愿意带男子到出口。 然而,米尔斯不满意林清福的解释,不理会保安的解释,甚至是用手阻挡保安的去处,而当保安试图推开时,米尔斯却声称保安推撞。后来还三番四次挑衅林清福打架,直到林清福受不了,对他大喊“够了”,米尔斯当即挥拳,将林清福打倒在地。 林清福在事后表示,他当时有试图向米尔斯解释,但米尔斯态度强硬,不予理会,且情绪看似愈发激动。他曾经问米尔斯是否想动手打他,洋汉愤怒表示有想打他的意愿。考量到自己的安危,便示意身旁同时录影,而被告在打了林清福后,甚至还威胁试图录影的同事。 米尔斯代表律师在庭上则向法官求情,对此被告已忏悔,并曾回到商场向林清福道歉,且作出2000元赔偿,随后还被带回警局调查。 律师也指出,由于视频被疯传,其个人资料被泄,导致被告在案发后五个月仍受到骚扰信到他家中,他也患有严重忧郁症,目前正在接受治疗。 法官在宣读判决时表示,被告在毫无人挑衅下迁怒与他人,也接受检方的说辞,有别于拥有正当权力的警察,保安更应受到法律的庇护,因而判刑被告一周监禁。  

DBSS not a “failure”: Desmond Lee

Minister of State for National Development, Desmond Lee, told Parliament on Monday…