Connect with us

Uncategorized

Drama rocks Copahengen

Severe delays and shock suspension of key discussion leaves negotiators in ”massive disappointment”. Hu Ching

Published

on

Hu Ching

Hu Ching is a member of ECO Singapore, hoping to bring forward the gravity of the climate change issue in Copenhagen this December. The group is part of the International Youth Climate Movement (IYCM) at the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC) 15th Conference of Parties (COP15).

With more than 120 heads of states and governments due to arrive in Copenhagen within the next 3 days, Monday (14 December 2009) marked the start of the highest level of negotiations at the United Nations Climate Change Conference.

It also heralded the possibility of a global political or even a legally-binding agreement at COP15. However, in a shocking twist of events, the Contact group on Annex I Parties’ emissions reductions was suspended within 5 minutes of commencement.

The discussion was scheduled to start at 10AM (Danish Time). However, the lack of urgency by party delegates themselves was unmistakable – negotiators were still seen making their way into the discussion rooms at 1025AM.

Coupled with administrative failures at the start of the session, there was no surprise with the 50 min delay, which constitutes more than half of the 90 minutes allocated for the important discussion.

The co-chairs of the sessions were apparently in confusion themselves, being unclear about the availability of venues within Bella Centre, where negotiations have already been on-going for the past week. In order to accommodate the huge turnout of party delegates and civil society observers, a last-minute decision was made to move hundreds of negotiators and observers into an adjacent larger room.

This did not prove to be a wise decision, considering that the discussion was already engaged in a frantic race against time to set the stage for an ambitious global agreement within the next 5 days. By the time the session started officially, it was already 1050AM.

As the first to speak, Australia sent shockwaves across the floor by requesting the co-chairs to suspend the session that has barely started, claiming that they were confused regarding the progress of the negotiations elsewhere in Copenhagen, and argued that based on their sources and latest news, the G77 and China has decided to suspend all negotiation temporarily.

This motion was met immediately by fierce opposition from Micronesia, Peru, China, South Africa, India and Bolivia. Peru pressed the co-chairs to consider the pertinence of the discussion and not to waste more time, expressing dismay over a previous delay which lasted 1.5 days. The Bolivian delegation sent out a message of urgency for the discussion to resume.

“There is no reason to suspend what is really the meaning behind Copenhagen”, the South American nation pleaded to the floor, in a clear reference to the specification of key emission reduction figures and timeframes for commitments to be enforced.

Sweden was the only other country which threw its support behind Australia, urging for the session to be suspended immediately in order that parties may clarify the situation and return later to resume discussions in the evening.

As the floor looks for direction on whether to continue with the session, the lack of transparency and restriction of information flow within Copenhagen become astonishingly evident as the co-chair themselves admitted to not knowing anything beyond the walls of their meeting room.

In a state of flurry and confusion, the co-chairs decided to close the session, claiming that the 20 minutes left for discussion was insufficient to secure any form of progress within the morning anyway. Instead of negotiating what are the targets to be implemented, national delegates found themselves deadlocked in a debate on whether to resume or to suspend the discussion.

As the hundreds of delegates and observers took their leave from the spacious meeting room, there was a clear spirit of disappointment in the atmosphere. Currently Article 3, paragraph 1 and paragraph 1 bis alone have no clear specifications of emission targets and commitment periods. If negotiators cannot even agree on the text, what are the chances that national leaders can reach a legally-binding agreement within the next 4 days?

Right now the bracketed text remains unaltered, but time is surely ticking away in Copenhagen.

This article was originally published at http://unfcccecosingapore.wordpress.com/

Read also: Poor countries agree to resume climate talk

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending