The country is ill-equipped to cope with a possible rise in homelessness

In February this year, the grim reality of the economic downturn in the United States was dramatically brought home to Americans by the Oprah Winfrey Show when it highlighted a “tent-city” in Sacramento that had more than 150 residents.  Homelessness is a perennial bugbear in the US, but recently it has worsened markedly: various states have reported a surge in the number of people applying for shelter, from 40% in New York to 58% in Louisville.  The government has since been scrambling to cope with the deteriorating situation.

A similar situation could arise in Singapore, despite official pronouncements that “there are no homeless, destitute or starving people” in the country.  The reality is that there were homeless people even during the boom years, but official rectitude has made it difficult to estimate the numbers or to properly assess the cause of their homelessness.

The government’s stance on the issue is clear: a brief parliamentary debate in 2007 on the plight of several homeless families elicited the government’s response that they were “homeless by choice”.  Nevertheless the government still seems rather uneasy about it.  When the predicament of some homeless folk was notably brought to light in 2007 by local filmmaker Martyn See, the censors deemed Mr See’s short film to be unsuitable for those under 16.

The problem is that official attitudes could hinder a measured response to the problem.  Anecdotal accounts suggest that the number of homeless in Singapore could be on the rise in recent months, with social workers relating a sharp uptick in the number of those trying to get admission into shelters.  The situation could worsen as the downturn deepens, given that unemployment as well as foreclosures are on the rise.

Already, the country seems be ill-equipped to cope with a possible increase in the number of homeless people.  The government would prefer the individual to depend on his extended family for help, but such support would be taxed by the severity of the current downturn as well as the decline of the extended family due to low birth-rates over the past years.  The Housing and Development Board (HDB) does offer rental units for homeless folk, but such units are comparatively few in number and there is usually a long waitlist for them, though HDB does provide interim housing to those who are waiting.  It has also recently tightened its criteria for determining who is eligible for rental housing: those who have bought and sold a flat more than twice are permanently barred from renting or even from getting a housing loan from HDB. 

Moreover, there are few shelters that the homeless can turn to, with only one that specialises in displaced families that has room for about thirty families.  Some homeless folk have made their homes in public parks, but their fate is uncertain after the National Parks Board this month reintroduced a system of permits that it did away with in 2004 to regulate those who want to camp in parks.

Help for the homeless, whether private or public, would surely be hindered by the lack of information about the extent of the problem.  On that score, the government certainly needs to do more.  It is instructive that those who fall into homelessness and destitution often face an uphill task to climb out of their predicament – the Sacramento “tent city”, for example, has been existence for a decade and was no recent phenomenon – so what may seem to be a temporary problem brought on by the current recession could in time turn out to be something more durable than expected.


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MP Png Eng Huat questions who implements HDB’s Neighbourhood Renewal Programme – current WP MP or defeated PAP candidate?

Workers’ Party’s Member of Parliament (MP) for Hougang SMC Png Eng Huat…

PM Lee’s national day message to Singapore

This year on 9 August, Singapore celebrates its 50th anniversary of its…

两名国人出席邻国宗教活动后感染 本地回教堂消毒、取消未来两周活动

日前我国两名国人到马来西亚参加宗教活动,确诊感染武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)。主管回教事务的环境及水源部长马善高宣布,今日(13日)起本地所有回教堂将关闭五天,进行消毒清洗,而回教堂也将在未来两周内取消所有活动与课程。 马善高亦在脸书上呼吁若有国人参加这场集会,需留意身体状况,一旦发现身体不适,尽请就医。 与此同时,马善高也表示,本地穆斯林可以以“晌礼”(Zuhur prayers),取代到回教堂祈祷。 他也欣慰指出,愈来愈多穆斯林已经开始适应新的模式,如携带自己的祈祷垫和用具,并暂时避免握手,确保社群的健康和安全。 早前,马国吉隆坡大城堡清真寺举办万人伊斯兰传教士集会,据报道指出,这场活动于2月27日至3月1日举办,涉及1万人参加。 据了解,我国疑有90名人参加了这场集会,而两名确诊感染的新加坡人中,其中一人为回教堂工作人员,他在回国后曾到4所回教堂执行任务,包括詹美回教堂(Jamae Chulia mosque)、Al Muttaqin回教堂、卡欣回教堂(Masjid Kassim),以及哈贾法蒂玛回教堂(Hajjah Fatimah),目前四所教堂已暂时关闭。 卫生部正在追踪曾出席马国宗教活动的新加坡人。…

网红美丽求求你拍讽刺视频 尚穆根批“已过界”

本地Youtube网红“美丽求求你”普丽蒂(Preeti Nair,简称Preetipls)因不满epay的宣传照制作视频讽刺调侃。内政兼律政部长尚穆根对此表示,这种行为已“越过界”,无法接受。 他回应,“该说唱视频以粗俗语言与姿势、对着新加坡华人比中指,刻意挑拨少数族群对华人的愤怒。” 尚穆根续指,“当你利用粗俗的语言与姿势挑拨其他种族的愤怒,我们就必须要画下界限并表明这种行为是不可接受的”,他还表明,如果允许这类的言论或歌曲持续散播,情况将更糟糕。 尚穆根直指,拍摄视频不尽然会引起暴力,可能民众也只会一笑置之,但也不应成为借口。 “如果你感到不满,你可以去要求道歉,如果你认为这是犯罪,你可以报警,但并不是要你越界。” 尚穆根称,如默许该说唱视频,那就行同默许其他人仿效,或将伤害种族和谐与社会结构。 “这样人民会感觉到安全吗?少数民族会放心吗?新加坡之所以能够成为优秀的国家,是因为我们让所有族群包括少数民族感觉到安全,所以我们有责任维持种族间的和谐”,他说。 视频昨撤下  网民重新上载 美丽求求你的说唱视频长达2分50秒,于周一(29日)上传至社交网络平台上,其歌词内容相信是针对日前充满争议的epay的宣传照而讽刺,但在昨天下午已撤下,在撤下前获得1100个赞和110则留言。 视频内普丽蒂批评新传媒拍摄的广告传递刻板印象,艺人打扮成印度人不好笑也看起来很傻,至少可以选用不同的人拍广告;至于她的哥哥苏巴什则揶揄“干嘛要妒忌他的肤色”,而怎么选谁都是华人赢;再者上一次屠妖节还有华人打扮成锡克族,令他感到受不了。…