The Edge Singapore apologises to ministers over POFMA-ed report relating to GCB transaction
The Edge Singapore issued an apology to Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng on Tuesday (24 Dec) over a POFMA-ed Bloomberg article it had reproduced. \n \nThe Edge acknowledged that the allegations in the article were false and apologised for the distress caused to the ministers.

SINGAPORE: Business publication The Edge Singapore issued an apology on Tuesday (24 December) to Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng for reproducing a Bloomberg article titled Singapore Mansion Deals Are Increasingly Shrouded in Secrecy. The article, which focused on Good Class Bungalow (GCB) transactions in Singapore, was deemed to contain falsehoods and was the subject of a Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction order issued on 23 December. The Ministry of Law (MinLaw) highlighted multiple inaccuracies in the article, which it claimed contained false statements of fact. The piece alleged a lack of transparency and checks in GCB transactions and implied that Mr Shanmugam and Dr Tan engaged in property dealings aimed at avoiding scrutiny, including in relation to potential money laundering.
Ministers Threaten Bloomberg with Legal Action
Mr Shanmugam and Dr Tan, who were explicitly mentioned in the article, described the allegations as libellous. On 16 December, just four days after the article was initially published on Bloomberg, the ministers announced their intention to issue Letters of Demand to Bloomberg and other outlets that reproduced the article in part or in full. On Tuesday, The Edge Singapore acknowledged its error, admitting that the article and a related Facebook post it shared perpetuated false and baseless claims. The Facebook post read: “Bloomberg says more people buy homes with trusts, hiding owners’ identities.” In a formal statement, The Edge expressed:"We recognise that the Article and the Post meant and were understood to mean that Mr K. Shanmugam took advantage of there being no checks and balances or disclosure requirements in selling his property in a non-transparent manner and that Mr Shanmugam wanted to hide his transaction and avoid scrutiny, including about the possibility of money laundering."The publication extended its apologies to the ministers for the “distress and embarrassment” caused by the article and post. It also confirmed that the article and Facebook post had been removed and undertook not to publish similar allegations in the future.











