Gerald Giam: MediShield Life bill changes must not burden those who rely on the scheme most
On 11 November, Workers’ Party MP Gerald Giam raised concerns during the debate on the MediShield Life Scheme (Amendment) Bill, highlighting the potential financial impact on low-income and elderly households. He stressed that while the bill aims to improve the MediShield Life framework, the changes should not burden those who rely on the scheme most.

SINGAPORE: On 11 November, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament Gerald Giam raised concerns during the debate on the MediShield Life Scheme (Amendment) Bill, focusing particularly on the financial impact on low-income and elderly households. The MP for Aljunied GRC urged the government to reconsider using the Annual Value (AV) of properties as a means-testing criterion for MediShield Life premium subsidies, particularly for retirees and low-income households. He suggested that individuals with AVs above S$25,000 should still be allowed to apply for subsidies, proposing a more holistic and transparent assessment based on individual circumstances. This approach, he argued, would enable the scheme to better target subsidies toward those who truly lack the cash flow to meet their healthcare needs. During the debate on the bill, Mr Giam emphasised that while the bill seeks to improve the MediShield Life framework, the changes must not impose unnecessary burdens on those who rely on the scheme the most.











