Singapore
Sudden guilty plea: Iswaran’s reversal stuns the public, yet proceedings unfold with eerie calm
TOC’s correspondent shares her observations in court as former Transport Minister S Iswaran unexpectedly pled guilty, reversing his earlier intent to contest the charges. The courtroom remained calm despite the public being stunned by his sudden decision to plead guilty after months of declaring innocence.
by Ten Leu-Jiun
It was a sombre morning in the packed courtroom as the clock edged towards 10 a.m. The atmosphere, though calm, carried an undercurrent of anticipation.
Media personnel filled the public gallery, reducing the 45-seat quota available for the general public in a room designed to hold just 45 people.
While more than 10 others waited outside, hoping for an opportunity to gain entry to the court, many others had already left, seeing no hope of getting a spot.
All eyes turned to the bench as Judge Vincent Hoong entered the courtroom. The gravity of the situation contrasted with the calm demeanour of the participants.
Deputy Attorney-General Tai Wei Shyong (DAG Tai) rose to address the court, stating that the prosecution would proceed with five amended charges against former Transport Minister S Iswaran, and another 30 charges would be taken into consideration for sentencing.
It was a bombshell development—after months of declaring his intention to contest the charges, Iswaran had suddenly chosen to plead guilty.
Despite this shocking reversal, there was little outward reaction from those involved. Iswaran’s defence lawyer, Senior Counsel Davinder Singh, confirmed that his client would be taking “a certain course of action” and pleading guilty to the amended charges.
The court seemed almost routine in its reaction to the news. Without missing a beat, Judge Hoong stated that the charges would be read to the accused and then stepped down, leaving the courtroom less than 10 minutes after it had opened.
A female court clerk began reading the 35 charges, but her voice was barely audible beyond the immediate vicinity of Mr Iswaran. The former minister, whose calm expression never wavered, remained motionless as the charges were read. His stoicism only added to the surreal nature of the morning. For months, Iswaran had maintained that he would fight the charges in court—now, with hardly a change in demeanour, he was pleading guilty.
In the public gallery, some members of the public exchanged whispers, trying to make sense of the sudden turn of events. DAG Tai’s voice, soft and slightly unclear, added to the confusion for those trying to catch the full implications of what had just unfolded.
At one point, DAG Tai invited Mr Singh to step outside to discuss something briefly. As they returned, DAG Tai wore a subtle smile. Meanwhile, Mrs Iswaran, seated in the gallery, turned to her companion and smiled, seemingly at ease, as if the guilty plea was not the seismic shift it appeared to be.
Half an hour passed, and the reading of the charges finally concluded. When Judge Hoong returned to the courtroom, Iswaran confirmed his plea—guilty to the five amended charges. It was a moment many in the public had not anticipated, yet it was met with an eerie calm.
DAG Tai then began reading the Statement of Facts, a step in formalizing the proceedings. The courtroom remained composed, even as the prosecution laid out the details of the case, which included the acceptance of more than S$400,000 in gifts, including F1 tickets, luxury flights, and hotel stays.
Judge Hoong, showing no outward reaction to the dramatic turn of events, inquired when the charges had been amended. DAG Tai responded that the amendments had been made that very day—yet, once again, there was no visible surprise from the judge. The process moved forward seamlessly, with Judge Hoong proceeding to convict Iswaran without delay.
As DAG Tai concluded, he submitted that the custodial threshold had clearly been crossed, implying that a prison sentence was likely. Yet, even with this looming, the courtroom remained uncharacteristically composed, as if the bombshell of a guilty plea from a former senior minister was just another day’s business.
Singapore
Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng to be charged for abetting graft and obstructing justice
Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng is expected to face charges on 4 October, 2024, linked to abetting graft and obstructing justice. Ong’s case is connected to former transport minister S Iswaran, who was recently sentenced to one year in jail. Iswaran had obtained over S$400,000 worth of gifts from Ong.
Property tycoon and hotelier Ong Beng Seng is set to face charges on Friday (4 October), according to Channel News Asia, citing Singapore court records.
Ong is expected to be charged with abetting one count each under Section 165 and Section 204A of Singapore’s Penal Code.
Section 165 pertains to a public servant obtaining valuables from individuals with whom they have an official relationship, while Section 204A deals with obstructing justice.
Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.
The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.
These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha. These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.
Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165. Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.
Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.
On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong. The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.
Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea. The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.
According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022. CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.
Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight. Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.
In addition to Ong, construction tycoon Lum Kok Seng was also linked to the additional charges filed against Iswaran in March this year.
Iswaran, who became transport minister in 2021, admitted to accepting valuable items worth approximately S$19,000 from Lum, including a Brompton bicycle, luxury wines, and golf equipment. However, no charges have been publicly announced against Lum.
This is not the first time Ong has found himself embroiled in controversy.
The 1990s saw questions over luxury condominium units sold by his company to Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew and his son. The units, part of the Nassim Jade and Scotts 28 condominiums, were allegedly sold at special discounts.
This raised eyebrows due to Ong’s familial links with the Lees – his uncle, Lee Suan Yew, was a director at HPL. Although then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong cleared the Lees of any wrongdoing in 1996, the incident has remained a notable mark on Ong’s business record.
Furthermore, an investigative report by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project in 2018 revealed allegations of corruption involving Ong in the leasing of two islands in the Maldives.
The report suggested that HPL had sidestepped Maldivian laws requiring public tender for island leases, instead conducting direct negotiations with Maldivian officials.
It was also alleged that a US$5 million payment made for the lease of Fohtheyo island had been siphoned off through a company associated with friends of the then Maldivian Vice President Ahmed Adeeb. Ong did not respond to these allegations.
Ong, who is the founder of the Singapore-based organization Hotel Properties and a shareholder in many businesses, has a net worth of S$1.7 billion.
Together with his wife Christina, they ranked No. 25 on Forbes’ Singapore’s 50 Richest list, which was published in August 2022.
Comments
Dr Chee Soon Juan criticises Ho Ching’s vision for 8-10 million population
SDP chief Dr Chee Soon Juan criticised Ho Ching’s claim that Singapore could support a population of 8 to 10 million through effective city planning. In a video message, he expressed scepticism about the push for population growth, citing adverse effects like rising living costs and mental health issues. Dr Chee argued that smaller populations can thrive, referencing Scandinavian countries that excelled internationally and produced Nobel laureates.
Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), slammed Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s spouse, Ho Ching, for her assertion that Singapore could accommodate 8 to 10 million people with proper city planning and land reclamation.
In a video message published on 1 October, Dr Chee expressed strong scepticism regarding the narrative of increasing the population, highlighting that the current surge past the 6 million mark had been largely driven by the influx of foreigners, which led to several adverse consequences.
He further highlighted that smaller populations were not inherently negative, drawing examples from some Scandinavian countries that had flourished on the international stage despite their smaller populations and had even produced Nobel Prize laureates.
Ho Ching expressed confidence that with proper city planning, Singapore could accommodate up to 8-10 million people
Last Friday (27 September), in a Facebook post, Madam Ho, who was also the former CEO of Temasek Holdings, highlighted the growing demand for caregivers as the population aged and the need for workers to sustain sectors like construction and engineering, particularly as the workforce shrank due to lower birth rates.
“As we have less children, we need more people from elsewhere to join us to keep this city functioning, from repairing train tracks through the night to serving patients in hospitals through the night. ”
Dr Chee Highlights Risks of Population Growth
In response, Dr Chee recalled his experience of being reprimanded by Minister for Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan during the last General Election for raising concerns about the implications of a rapidly growing population.
He questioned why Madam Ho, who shared similar views, had not faced the same scrutiny.
In his video, Dr Chee articulated several concerns regarding the proposed increase in population, highlighting the potential negative impacts, including increased demand for food, housing, and transportation, which would result in a significant rise in living costs.
With a larger population, Dr Chee pointed out that more flats, roads, hospitals, and public transportation would need to be constructed, which would ultimately require higher taxes and fees to maintain the necessary infrastructure.
The SDP leader emphasized that an influx of residents would intensify competition for jobs, exerting downward pressure on wages and potentially leading to higher rates of unemployment and underemployment.
Dr Chee further expressed concern over the environmental degradation that would accompany population growth, citing the recent clearing of forests for housing and industrial developments, including Tengah and Kranji Forests.
Dr Chee questioned the ability of existing infrastructure to cope with a growing population, referencing the persistent issues with the MRT system, including breakdowns and safety hazards.
He highlighted the toll that congestion and overpopulation take on the mental health of Singaporeans, noting a rise in reported mental health challenges.
“All this while the ministers live in secluded and luxurious bunglows and villas, far from the madding crowd which we are subjected to every single day.”
“So, when Ho Ching says that we can accommodate up to 10 million people, I’d like to ask her, where and what type of house she lives in?”
Dr Chee Argues for Innovative Economic Solutions Over Traditional Urban Expansion
Regarding the ruling government’s persistent push to increase Singapore’s population to what he considered “unhealthy levels,” Dr Chee suggested that the PAP lacked viable alternatives for fostering economic growth.
He implied that the government resorted to traditional methods of expansion, such as construction and urban development.
He highlighted that the government is fixated on physically expanding the city—“digging, pouring concrete, and erecting structures”—to sustain GDP growth.
This approach, he argued, creates an illusion that Singapore remains a productive economic hub, despite potential downsides.
Dr Chee Advocates for the Value of Smaller Populations: Cites Political Freedom as Key to Innovation and Success
Dr Chee further contended that a smaller population did not necessarily hinder a nation’s success.
He cited several Scandinavian countries and Taiwan, emphasising their global brands and innovations despite their relatively small populations.
Dr Chee connected the success of these nations to their political freedoms, arguing that the ability to think and express oneself freely fostered innovation and societal progress.
He contrasted this with Singapore, where he claimed that the government controlled media and stifled freedom of expression.
He criticised the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) for its centralised control and for limiting the potential of Singaporeans. Dr Chee used the metaphor of a “grotesque monkey” clinging to the nation, suggesting that the PAP hindered progress and growth.
Dr Chee emphasised that the quality of a population—its talent, energy, and potential—was far more important than its size.
He suggested that Singapore possessed the necessary attributes to succeed on a global scale but was held back by the current political landscape.
He urged Singaporeans to engage in critical thinking rather than passively accepting government narratives.
Dr Chee advocated for a more mature and sophisticated approach to governance and civic engagement, encouraging citizens to take an active role in shaping their society.
-
Comments6 days ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments2 days ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Crime2 weeks ago
Leaders of Japanese syndicate accused of laundering S$628.7M lived in Singapore
-
Current Affairs1 week ago
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
-
Singapore6 days ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore6 days ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore4 days ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Singapore4 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home