At the National Day Rally last night (29 Aug), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong acknowledged the existence of social frictions arise between Singaporeans and foreign work pass holders in Singapore.

He noted that most work pass holders do not stay long enough to integrate fully into Singapore’s society. “Social frictions arise because culturally, work pass holders are different from us,” he said. “They look like us, yet they don’t act like us.”

He added that there is a need to ease such social frictions. “Both sides need to make the effort. Singaporeans must be open to living with and accepting others who are not exactly like us. Non-Singaporeans here must accept the ethos and norms of our society, and make the effort to fit in,” he said.

Continuing, PM Lee said that Singapore is generally an egalitarian society.

“But some work pass holders and their families bring with them social practices and class distinctions from their own countries. These run counter to the informal and equal way Singaporeans interact with one another, and that causes frictions,” he acknowledged. “Non-Singaporeans must understand how Singapore is, so that they can fit in better.”

He said he decided to acknowledge the problem so as to “address Singaporeans’ legitimate concerns” and “defuse resentments over foreigners”.

Bringing in caste culture from India

PM Lee did not name which countries these work pass holders that he referred to as bringing with them “social practices and class distinctions from their own countries”.

But interestingly, in an interview with SPH in 2015, former Cabinet Minister S. Dhanabalan has already given some clues.

He noted that the new Indians from India, who are mostly professionals, bring “bad habits” with them, which most of the Indians in Singapore have forgotten or got rid off. “They have a very strong sense of caste,” he said.

“In fact I’ve heard of instances where, in major American banks, an Indian was put up for promotion by a non-Indian. The non-Indian boss was told that you better not promote him because he’s in the wealth management part of the bank and he’s got to talk to other professional Indians to persuade them to put the money with you, and he’s not of the caste that they will respect.”

“So can you imagine these are people who studied overseas, outside India, who have done well and now work in an American bank and are still holding on to such caste prejudices,” Mr Dhanabalan said of these professional work pass holders from India. It’s something Singapore should reject completely, he added.

“But they do bring it with them. They may have lived many years outside of India but they remain very strongly caste-conscious. They will deny it. So this particular Indian was not promoted, but was given another job of a higher level which did not involve trying to sell the bank’s services to professional Indians. That’s something that is very disturbing,” Mr Dhanabalan lamented.

“It may even go into languages – division by languages. Whether someone speaks Marathi as against Gujarati. A Gujarati against Indians who are Tamil speakers. Tamils against Telugus and Telugus against Kannadas. This feeling is very strong in India. That’s why states are getting divided… So we must ensure that they do not bring this, what I call ‘primitive ideas’ here.”

Mr Dhanabalan said such practices that come from India are not relevant to Singapore. “So if they want to be a part of Singapore and be integrated, they have to get rid of this kind of thinking. They may be upset by what I’m saying, but I think it needs to be said,” he spoke candidly.

Presently, as revealed by Manpower Minister Tan See Leng in Parliament in Jul this year after questioning by oppositions, about 25 percent of the 177,100 employment pass (EP) holders in Singapore came from a single country – India. Dr Tan did not disclose the proportion for S Pass holders.

Ministry of Manpower announced last year that 47 companies with suspected discriminatory hiring practices have been placed on its Fair Consideration Framework (FCF) watchlist.

Of the 47 companies, 30 (64 per cent) are in the financial and professional services sectors. They include banks, fund management firms, management consulting companies, as well as firms that provide project management and engineering services.

MOM said that all 30 of the financial and professional services employers have a “high concentration of PMETs from single nationalities”.

In one financial institution in the fund management industry, almost three-quarters of their PMETs are of the same nationality and in another bank, almost two-thirds of the PMETs are also of the same nationality, MOM revealed. The Ministry, however, did not name the nationality in this financial institution.

Mr Dhanabalan also opined that caste is probably much less among the Indian Singaporeans. “I mean I’m completely unconscious of people’s caste,” he said of himself.

Mr Dhanabalan left the Cabinet and the government in 1992. Year later, he revealed that his leaving had been due to differences of opinion with the other Cabinet members over the arrests of 22 people under the Internal Security Act in 1987. The group, many of whom were linked to the Catholic Church, was accused to be involved in a Marxist conspiracy to overthrow the Singapore government.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
51 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

China cannot be absent: Xi Jinping, in new year message

“The world is so big, and the problems are so many,” China’s…

咖啡店静等生意上门 黑市咳嗽药水贩卖生意佳

芽笼七巷的咖啡店后面俨然成为了自制咳嗽水的贩卖位置,每晚都有一名男子在此处做生意,且生意兴隆。有关的“药物”销售无需任何看诊,而给出的咳嗽药瓶子也没有标签。 卖家则是一名一眼看去就知道没受过医学培训的中年男子,但是还是准备好向买家出售一瓶咳嗽药水。 有关的药水瓶子被隐藏在距离该处数米外的邮箱和电单车车厢内,并且每次卖出咳嗽药后即可收取现金。 无视执法 贩卖范围扩大 有关的咳嗽药水疑似含有鸦片提取物可待因(codeine),一种被成瘾者滥用的阿片类药物。 尽管当局多年来都有展开突击行动,但是“咳嗽药”的贩卖甚至扩大到芽笼九巷和11巷。 根据卫生科学局指出,有市场需求下导致了“咳嗽药水”的供应,当局已经和其他机构合作,进行监测和执法行动。从2016年至去年,已经查获超过460公升的自制药水,估计市价可达13万新元,17人因为涉及非法贩卖而面控。 一小时内10买家上门 《海峡时报星期刊》报导指出,记者于上周三到上述地点查看时,发现一名40余岁的男子在兜售自制咳嗽药水,而大多数顾客是年龄介于20至40岁的男人。 商人当时小心翼翼地环顾四周,并在买家到来时到巷后抓起数瓶装有棕色药水的瓶子给买家,并收取现钱。 短短一个小时,就见至少有10名买家前来,有者更一次购买了数瓶药水。有些人在购药后,迅速到后巷喝下“药水”,并将瓶子丢在排水沟内。…

国大生犯非礼罪判缓刑遭质疑 法官:不应视缓刑为“判刑较轻”

今年9月,国大生萧凯运(译音)于地铁站和车厢内三度非礼女性大腿和臀部被控上法庭,却因成绩好判处21个月缓刑,引起公众不满,认为判决过轻。法官对此回应,不应将缓刑视为“判刑较轻”的判决。 《海峡时报》报道,地方法官Jasvender Kaur表示,“在21个月的缓刑期间,他必须完成150个小时的社区服务,接受宵禁与参加针对罪行而设置的课程,减低再犯风险,使他能够再重回社会。” 23岁的被告萧凯运(译音)为一名国大生,他承认于去年9月12日晚上11时25分,在乘搭朝榜鹅地铁站方向的东北列车上,用左手触碰一名28岁女郎的双腿以及臀部。 地方法官认为被告在犯罪时显然是不成熟的心智状态,才会犯下罪行,所以目前的判处不仅符合被告,也符合社会最佳利益。 然而,对检察官而言,非礼行为是严重的指控,尤其是发生在公共交通工具上。检察官Deborah Lee和 Benedict Chan评估,萧凯运已符合成年人嫌犯条件,因此缓刑对他而言更像是一起例外,而非常态。 检察官进一步补充道,萧凯运自2016年8月开始,便出现恶习。针对萧凯运过往的行为,其表现并未出现强烈的改变意图,也正因他过去曾在公共交通工具上非礼,而强化了他的犯罪行为,成为根深蒂固的恶习。目前检察官将对判决提出上诉,要求判处6周监禁。 法官称罪行为受害者带来痛苦,但却未有受害者受到心理创伤 对此,法官承认,在公共交通上犯下非礼罪为严重罪行,但即使罪行相当严重,但伤害性质相对较轻,因此更应该注重其后的康复工作。…

HDB notice to dog owners attracts criticism over inhumane advice

A photo of what seems to be a notice by the Housing…