“What jurisdiction does FAS even have over non FAS activities?” asked ex-sports journalist Jose Raymond following the Association’s media statement on banned former national footballer K Kannan last Friday (20 Aug).

In a Facebook post on Monday (24 Aug), Mr Raymond, who was previously the chairman of Singapore People’s Party (SPP), questioned the Association’s jurisdiction over non-FAS activities and said that it has yet to address the issue at hand.

“Article 75.8 of the FAS own Constitution clearly confines the permanent suspension of players or officials to be limited to only ‘football management, membership, or the activities of the FAS’,” he explained, adding that Mr Kannan’s role at the Indian Association (IA) does not fall under FAS jurisdiction.

“Activities at the IA are not activities of the FAS, and its legal reach does not cover social and private clubs which are not affiliated.

“The FAS are not Lords of All Football Activities in Singapore,” chided Mr Raymond.

FAS’ statement was made in response to an earlier post by Mr Raymond about Mr Kannan’s lifetime ban in which he said that it is “preposterous” that Mr Kannan wasn’t even allowed to play football with his friends.

Mr Raymond had also included a photo of a letter signed by FAS president Lim Kia Tong issued to Mr Kannan reminding him that he was not to partake in any football-related activities either directly or indirectly.

Specifically, FAS took issue with Mr Raymond’s attachment of only the last two paragraphs of the letter and leaving out the rest, which the Association said gave the public an “incorrect impression” that Mr Kannan received a letter just for playing “social football”.

FAS noted that the unseen second and third paragraphs of that letter stated that the Association has been informed of Mr Kannan’s involvement in football management and football activities, including playing the sport, at the IA.

In his latest post, however, Mr Raymond emphasised that the FAS’ own constitution does not bar Mr Kannan from playing and assisting in football-related events in IA, given that the IA is not an affiliate of the FAS.

He also revealed that the football covenor of the IA had sent several correspondences to the FAS last year about this matter. The letters demanded an explanation over the 12 August 2020 letter sent by the FAS to Mr Kannan following a complaint it received from someone at the IA.

“Despite repeated reminders from the IA football convenor, there was no response to the issue even though the office of the FAS General Secretary responded to say there would be a response in due course,” said Mr Raymond.

IA President Vishnu Pillai followed up with a note to the FAS on 25 January this year about this matter but has yet to receive a response, Mr Raymond added.

He continued, “The FAS should make public who from the IA sent the complaint, under what auspices was the complainant filing the said complaint, whether the FAS checked against its own constitution before issuing the response to Kannan, and why it still hasn’t responded to the IA despite repeated requests.

“The FAS’ response to my Facebook post and the subsequent media queries clearly shows that it still believes it has legal jurisdiction over activities of an individual at a private members club, which is not an affiliate of its body.”

Mr Raymond also pointed out that the FAS has yet to respond to the other issue he brought up in a separate post on the issuing of bans to players, in particular the “unfairness” in which the Association has meted out lifetime bans.

In a separate Facebook post on 20 August, Mr Raymond highlighted that seven Liaoning Guangyuan players convicted of match-fixing in Singapore back in 2008 were not given lifetime bans by the FAS.

He described this as “grossly unfair” and demanded that the FAS explain why these seven players were not given lifetime bans like so many others including Mr Kannan.

Mr Raymond repeated this call in his latest post, saying: “The FAS needs to explain itself, and perhaps even put its hands up and accept that it may have made a mistake, in trying to dictate what Kannan could and could not do at a private members club which it has no jurisdiction over.”

Focusing on Mr Kannan’s ban, he pointed out that the ex-footballer was punished in 1995 for a mistake he made and has “served his dues”.

“After 26 years, he remains on a list of banned players, without any review, and yet the FAS still continues to believe it has a right to curtail his private and social football activities,” said Mr Raymond, describing the act as “shocking”.

Mr Kannan has submitted an appeal to the FAS regarding his ban. The FAS said that the matter is “currently undergoing the due process” and that it would be “inappropriate” for the FAS to make further comments matter until the FAS Council has made an official decision.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Chee speaks in Yale-NUS – The Future of One-Party Rule in Singapore

This op-ed is written by Sherlyn (S) and Wei Jie (WJ), two…

【选举】李显龙:国会解散公共服务仍会运作

李显龙总理指出,和每届大选一样,在选举期间,公共服务仍会继续运作,为人民提供服务。 他指出,虽然每届大选都是如此,但是他还是要强调这一点,因为我国正处于冠状病毒19防疫期间,所以政府和相关部门的运作尤其重要,既保持国家经济运作也让大家保住饭碗。 因此,跨部门防疫工作小组会在陆续几周,持续跟进有关的防疫工作,而全国就业理事会也会在这段期间创造就业和培训坊,让企业、员工和家庭都获得援助和支持。 他强调,本届大选和以往有所不同,除了受到疫情影响之外,也是因为此次大选后所成立的政府,将会对未来作出重大决定,包括塑造国家未来的发展,以及国民的生计和生活水平。 就此,李显龙促请民众在做出决定之前,要慎重考虑,明智投票,以保障国家和人们的未来。

Grab puts an end to its “commute” and “all-access” subscription plans

Technology company Grab has announced that it will be putting an end…

若用户的使用心态未改善 普杰立:当局或考虑禁个人代步工具

若用户的使用心态未有改善,当局或考虑全面禁用个人代步工具(PMD)。 交通部兼通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立医生,昨日在国会上,回应有关个人代步工具的问题时指出,最理想的情况应该是划分不同的专用通道给不同的使用者例如行人、个人代步工具、车辆,但碍于基础设施的限制,当局目前仅允许行人与脚踏车能够共用人行道。 普杰立表明目前正与陆交局合作,尽快采取措施如扩建人行道或安装限速条、改善事故热点的安全。同时当局也会加快建造个人代步工具和脚踏车专用道。 因此,在措施仍未全面实施前,他也促请个人代步工具的用户需小心使用器材,多替别人着想。 “如果他们(个人代步工具使用者)的态度没有改善,我们可能没有办法,只好在新加坡禁用个人代步工具。这会是个遗憾“,他表示。 本社日前报道,陆交局自上月23日开始至本月3日,短短两周内,已经接到逾2800份有关销毁不符合防火标准的个人代步工具之申请。而当局也回收了940台不符合标准的个人代步工具。 为鼓励民众销毁不符合防火标准的个人代步工具,陆交局自上个月开始,在指定地点收取民众不符合UL2272防火标准的代步工具,而符合资格的民众可获得100元的奖励金。 涉电动踏板车事故至老妇重创亡 上月21日,发生一宗涉及个人代步工具的不幸车祸:年轻电动踏板车骑士疑载女友超速,结果撞倒一名骑脚车的65岁妇女。事件引起坡民激烈反弹,亦有网民在网络发起联署活动,收集得超过6万7000人签名,以提呈给陆路交通管理局、总理李显龙和律政部长尚穆根。 近期王美英遭电动踏板车撞倒的个案,绝不是首宗事故,事实上此前已有人被电动脚车骑士撞至脑部受创,以及小孩被撞伤等个案发生。这致使行人走在行人道都要人心惶惶,警惕是否有电动踏板车突然杀出。 个人代步工具意外事件频传,7月时,宏茂桥与武吉巴督于两周内发生火灾,均以个人代步充电后引起火患,导致多人受伤入院甚至还造成一人死亡。 据民防部队统计,去年已有74起个人代步工具相关案件被通报,均因个人代步工具电池所引起。