Following the publishing of a Straits Times article from an American professor, praising Singapore’s achievements and telling Singaporeans not to complain, ST went further to publish a letter from a member of the public, Michael Lim, supporting the American’s view (‘Forum: Singaporeans have it good in many ways‘, 3 Aug).

Lim said that he has spent two decades away from Singapore, in Hong Kong, Vietnam, Taiwan and now Thailand. “I can attest to how fortunate and blessed we Singaporeans are in many different ways,” he said.

“I learnt that the poor in the other places I have lived in have it worse than the poor in Singapore, while the rich in these other places also fare better than the rich in Singapore in terms of comfort, influence and access.”

“This inequality has unfortunately shown up during the current pandemic in the differential access to vaccines in some of these places,” he added.

He agreed with the American professor that Singaporeans are indeed a complaining lot.

“But we should complain with humour, humility and reverence for the system that our forefathers built and our current generation upholds,” he said. “And as our nation celebrates its National Day, we surely must have the confidence that we have more blessings to come.”

More seniors having to work

It’s not known what kind of blessings Lim is expecting Singaporeans to have but certainly, with the large number of Singaporeans not having enough money in their Central Provident Fund (CPF) account for retirement, many will have to work till they perish from this world (‘400K Singaporeans between age 55 to 70 don’t have enough in CPF to meet Basic Retirement Sum‘, 23 Mar 2021).

It was reported in March this year that there are currently around 400,000 people aged 55 to 70 who don’t have enough in their CPF to meet the Basic Retirement Sum (BRS), which is intended to provide a lifelong basic monthly income of up to $800. Currently, for CPF members turning age 55 this year, the BRS which is half of the the Minimum Sum is set to $93,000 by the government as of 2021.

Indeed, without sufficient CPF savings, many have to continue to work even in their ripe old age. Just 3 months ago in May, it was reported that a cleaner who was infected with the coronavirus at Changi airport terminal is, in fact, an 88-year-old elderly working at the airport. Many netizens were asking why the elderly is still working especially at such a high-risk location with imported COVID-19 cases flying into Singapore everyday.

One netizen wrote, “This is really heartbreaking. Still working as a cleaner at 88. And yet they still want to happy happy open borders to high risk countries.” Another asked, “Where did we go wrong?”

And even with $800 a month assuming one is able to meet the BRS requirement, it may not be enough to see the person retiring comfortably in Singapore. According to a 2019 study conducted by LKY School of Public Policy and NTU, a single person aged 65 and above would need at least $1,379 a month to sustain a descent basic standard of living in Singapore.

In order to cope with rising living costs, an increasing number of elderly Singaporeans have resorted to making a return to the workforce at an age when many would like to retire comfortably.

It was reported in 2019 where Reuters reported that the employment rate for people over 65 in Singapore have jumped over 15 percent in the past decade.

“Some of them say they have to continue to work in order to survive”.

“Almost a third of Singaporeans over 65 work”, according to Reuters, adding that “the employment rate for the elderly has jumped over 15 percent”.

“Since 2016, the country has launched several schemes to help companies with older staff, such as redesign grants that subsidise pay.

“The government is hoping to help older workers remain in the workforce longer and stay productive members of society,” Reuters added.

Speaking to Reuters, Philip, a 71-year-old security officer at Alliance Française, said that “instead of enjoying retirement”, he works six days a week at the French cultural centre, during which he screens incoming visitors to ensure that no trespassing occurs.

Citing his reasons for working at such an age, Mr Philip said that his reasons “can be summed up in two letters: A and I.”

“A stands for active – being active; I: to be independent,” he beamed.

However, with a “sky high cost of living and one of the highest life expectancies worldwide”, many older workers in Singapore have few choices but to return to the workforce after retirement “because they simply cannot survive otherwise”, Reuters highlighted.

Younger Singaporeans involving in freelance work with no CPF

There have also been worries that many of the younger Singaporeans who are involved in freelance work in the gig economy nowadays, may have difficulties retiring when they get old.

This is because such freelance work does not guarantee a stable income for the long term and would impact their CPF savings. Others, including high-income earners, are worried about pay cuts and retrenchments in future, which would also impact their CPF savings and retirements.

Meanwhile, in Australia, a first world country which the writer Lim presumably did not work in, the retirement of elderly is well taken care of. A typical Australian who is single can get a pension amount of A$952.70 per 2 weeks, or about A$2,064 (S$2,144) per month.

In fact, most of the pension money would likely be spent off by the Australian pensioner, helping to drive its local economy since he or she knows they would be getting the money continuously every 2 weeks.

In Singapore, the government expects the children to fund the retirement of their elderly parents if they don’t have enough to retire. In fact, the Maintenance of Parents Act in Singapore even provides for an elderly aged 60 years old and above who is unable to subsist on his own, to sue his children so as to claim maintenance money from them.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

联署冀废除扣押成绩单举措 获部长回函认同检讨

此前,社运份子吴家和在脸书分享,有清寒子弟因家里经济状况因素,学校费用未缴清,致使他们只能领取小六会考(PSLE)成绩单的影印本,幸得善心人士解围才顺利获得成绩单正本。 至于教育部则透过媒体澄清,有关学生仍能继续申请中学入学,不过也证实,若学费未缴清,有关学生只能拿到影印本而不是成绩单正本,且这是该部“一贯的政策。” 此事也引来社会群体的关注,有者也发起联署,要求教育部改善措施,废除有关因欠费即扣押成绩单正本的举措。 素有乌敏岛“胡须”画家之称的陈世平发起联署,反对教育部以此当作“教育寓意”,除了会对孩子的自尊带来影响,也可能为他们带来父母没有能力或无法依赖的印象,这样的做法对子女成长并没有太大帮助。 据陈世平今日(18日)在脸书分享,上述联署已获得教育部长王乙康的关注,陈世平也公开部长的回函,电邮中部长坦言,要求家长承担小部分的费用,究竟能不能起到作用,值得探讨。 此前,教育部在官方声明中解释,此事无关乎“回收款项”,而是考量到教育费大部分都是公共拨款,那么基于一项原则,大家仍能共同承担和正视义务,不管这些费用多小。该部希望家长们一同来强化此举带出的意义。 “校方师长竭尽所能帮助清寒学生” 王乙康在回函中回应,并不认同一些人士认为校方和家长并不关心;反之,他们站在教育的最前线,竭尽所能来帮助那些来自清寒背景的学生。 “再者,对于那些认为申请财务援助困难且有贬低意味的意见,我有不同观点。任何政府计划都免不了要经过表格申请。但都不难填写,且校方职员也能为家长提供帮助。” 王乙康也不认为学生无法拿到成绩单正本,就意味着受到侮辱,反之校方对此都会较敏感。而学生照样和其他学生一样申请中学和升学。 来年国会作出回应 “但我不能排除掉那些特殊案例,再者究竟这种要求家长承担小数费用的措施是都有效,也值得质疑。所以这项措施理应检讨。”…

PRC with virus uses public transport but MOH says risk low; Bloomberg says some patients have no fever

It was reported yesterday (24 Jan) that two more imported cases of…

前学者:大开闸引外劳 激烈人力市场竞争致薪酬拉低

近期,有网民转载分享,一名即将迎来65岁生日的公积金会员,收到了公积金局的来信。信函通知他,在65岁后,可每月从公积金账户中提取250元,为时八年。 不过,如果他有意在65岁就开始提取存款,就必须另行通知当局,否则,就要等到70岁才才能开始提款。 有者舆论,每月250元如何生存,再者八年内每月只能领取250,说明他的公积金存款仅少于三万元。 我们不清楚为何他并没多少公积金积蓄,也许他早年工作几年后,就成了不用还公积金的有钱“头家”,但也可能他是较不幸的群体,半辈子只能到处打零工过活。 无论如何,事实是还有大部分的年长国人,没有足够的公积金积蓄。 去年,人力部长杨莉明在国会指出,2016年,仅53巴仙的公积金会员到了55岁达到全额退休储蓄条件,即达到16万1千元的存款。 相对地,这也意味着,其余有近半、多达47巴仙公积金会员,在2016年年届55岁,仍无法达到全额退休储蓄,乃至最低存款额(8万5500元)的条件。 有些人可能会辩解,公积金存款数额多寡,也和个人薪酬和赚钱能力有关,所以存款少的人只能怪自己没有能力赚得更多。 李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长刘浩典教授,直接驳斥这种谬论。 刘浩典在一篇文章指出,许多中等和低收入国人的财富增长过去十年来十分缓慢。 “一些证据指出我国服务领域劳工比起其他富有国家缺乏生产力。瑞典的巴士司机、清洁工和建筑工友的生产力可能还优于新加坡。” 不过问题来了:我国素质教育已经普及化,为何贫富差距反而加剧?教育普及化不是理应缩减生产力的差距,从而也能减低薪资差异吗?…

Much needed cleanup finally done by NEA

NEA should bear responsibility for health risks too. Khairulanwar Zaini.