On Mon (19 Jul), the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) made a post on its Facebook page, advising people to ensure that their job advertisements adhere to TAFEP guidelines so as to “avoid being discriminatory”, regardless of the recruitment platform used.

The post even included further write-ups to help employers write a “fair job advertisement”. TAFEP was set up in 2006 by the Ministry of Manpower, NTUC and Singapore National Employers Federation to promote the adoption of fair, responsible and progressive employment practices in Singapore.

Not long after TAFEP made the post, a netizen made a follow-up post on Wed (21 Jul) showing TAFEP that a discriminatory advertisement has been made on Facebook.

The netizen asked TAFEP if the advertisement is considered acceptable. “The wording seems to indicate that they are ONLY recruiting people from India for these jobs and no one else,” the netizen noted.

TAFEP replied on Thursday (22 Jul) saying, “We will look into this recruitment ad. Thanks.”

Discriminatory job advertisement comes from Maclareen Consulting

Further online checks reveal that the job advertisement actually came from the Facebook page of Maclareen Consulting, an education consulting firm based in the city of Thane which lies in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region of India.

The advertisement asked for numerous positions with salaries offered ranging from S$2,500 to S$3,700. The advertisement is asking for S Pass job applicants. The job advertisement was on Maclareen Consulting’s Facebook page since 30 Mar this year.

It’s not known if Maclareen Consulting has a local representative but if the job advertisement was uploaded outside of Singapore, TAFEP may not necessary have the power to stop the advertisement.

In any case, it appears that Maclareen Consulting is only an agent. It’s not known if any of the companies in Singapore have asked them directly to help recruit foreign S Pass job applicants. If it was indeed the case, then these companies would unlikely be willing to recruit any local job applicants since they have already bent on recruiting S Pass foreigners.

Then, any job advertisements put up by these companies on the Singapore’s National Jobs Bank to recruit Singaporeans will be futile.

Whistleblower needed to stop company from identifying pre-hires

Currently, companies need to put up jobs ads on the Jobs Bank to give the locals a chance to apply before they are allowed to hire foreigners.

Last Oct, the media published an article highlighting an unfair hiring case involving a finance and insurance company. The company was caught pre-selecting a foreign candidate for a managerial role at its Singapore office, after a whisleblower, the firm’s human resources manager subsequently filed a complaint with TAFEP against the company.

It was found that while the company posted a job advertisement on the Jobs Bank for the minimum period of 14 days as stipulated under the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF), the company went on to sign the employment contract with the pre-selected foreign applicant even before the job advertisement on the Jobs Bank had expired.

Furthermore, it was found that the work experience and educational qualifications of the pre-selected foreigner, a British national based at the company’s London office, also did not meet the advertised requirements.

The advertisement received more than 60 applications, with 28 fulfilling the advertised requirements, but none of the applicants were invited for interviews.

The case was subsequently referred to MOM but MOM decided to suspend the work pass privileges of the offending firm for only 6 months.

If it wasn’t for the whisleblower, the said firm mentioned earlier would have successfully recruited the British national from its London office to Singapore.

Subscribe
Notify of
151 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

More seamless and secure access to vehicle services on One.Motoring website

New digital services that will be available on the One.Motoring website, starting from…

审计署点名三部门、八法定机构 出现疏漏

审计署发表的2019/2020财政年度审计长报告中 ,称多达三个部门、八个法定机构出现IT监管、采购和合约管理、运作管理,以及商业津贴项目管理等方面疏漏。 这三个部门包括:财政部的会计署、总理公署的公共服务部和外交部。 八个法定部门包括:国家图书馆局;教育部旗下的义安理工学院、共和国理工学院;环境与水源部旗下的公共事业局、贸工部旗下的裕廊集团、总理公署旗下的政府科技局;人力部劳动力发展局(Workforce);和贸工部企业发展局等等。 其中,国家图书馆局被揭发,旗下国家档案馆翻新计划,75项合同变动(contract variation),有近半都未有给出预估成本就获得原则上同意(in-principle approvals (IPAs)),缺乏审核官员的监督。 审计署在审计裕廊集团帐目时,发现有收据造假和投标商报价造假,该集团已报警处理。 财政部会计署 审计署发现,会计署PaC@Gov最重要的操作系统,供应商可以在不需密码情况下就登入;审核流程也不健全,无法侦测到未经授权的使用。这意味着该部的电脑资讯管理有待加强。 公共服务部…

【选举】王瑞杰称不曾说过把人口增至1千万

在昨晚(1日)于新传媒进行的朝野政党电视辩论,民主党武吉巴督单选区候选人徐顺全,质问政府有意作一千万人口的规划,但随即被行动党荷兰-武吉知马候选人维文驳斥,指这是虚假声明。 至于东海岸集选区候选人王瑞杰则声称,他不曾说过要把人口增至1千万。政府也未有这个目标。而当前的趋势来看,到2030年可能人口还少过690万。 然而,他坦言自己是在去年3月,出席南洋理工大学常年部长论坛。当时有与会者提问人口白皮书一事。 他表示前总规划师刘太格曾公开提议,我们的人口目标应比现在更高。但自己未认可有关主张,只是解释人口规模不单只是实体空间,也包含社会空间,以及如何保有凝聚力。 不过,当时王瑞杰也曾指出,新加坡的人口密度还不算过高,还有其他城市在宜居空间方面更加拥挤。 城市规划之父”刘太格是在2014年曾提议,新加坡要保持长远永续成长,就应以人口达到一千万的情况作规划。 另一方面,人力部也发文,指前进党代表阮健平在电视辩论提出,有关失业本地PMET(专业人士、经理、执行员和技师)的数据有误,因为根据今年1月30日公布的《2019年劳动力报告》,截至去年6月,只有3万9000名PMET失业。

Registration for E-bikes to be required by LTA to better enforce against illegal modification

In a letter submitted to the ST forum on Monday (July 25), Land…