Connect with us

Comments

Students criticise MOE’s lack in managing students’ mental health following tragedy at RVHS

Published

on

The Ministry of Education “should’ve stepped up their game” in providing the students and teachers of River Valley High School (RVHS) with the proper resources required in dealing with the aftermath of the recent tragedy, said some students on the Wake Up Singapore Facebook page on Wednesday (21 July).

When students returned to RVHS two days after a 16-year-old student allegedly murdered a 13-year-old student in the school toilet, the school and MOE attempted to help the other students process what happened with a 2-hour CARE programme.

In an earlier feedback published on Wake Up Singapore earlier that day, a group of students—who remained anonymous—criticised the programme for being “not well thought through”.

One of the examples cited was the use of a “one size fits all solution worksheet” on coping mechanisms in which one of the strategies was “I was made for this challenge”.

The student remarked: “…some if not all of us found this particular option very inappropriate as a coping mechanism. It had no substance in helping us cope with the situation but downplayed what we’ve gone through because of the one size fits all solution worksheet they offered.”

“It felt like they just wanted to quickly pack matters up and move on,” the students added.

In a follow-up series of messages published on Wake Up Singapore later that same day to clarify what they meant, the students reiterated that they were referring to the MOE’s handling of the programme, specifically, and how the Ministry should have provided the school with proper resources.

“Our intentions were to raise awareness about MOE’s lacking in managing students’ mental health, as like many others, we also believed the teachers should not be the ones carrying out this care programme, but instead professional third parties from the MOE [should be doing it],” the students asserted.

They went on to say that it “disturbed” them to see the “obviously traumatised, tired and exasperated” teachers having to carry out a programme that they were not trained professionally to do.

The students explained that this was one of the reasons they wanted to bring this matter to the public.

However, the students also apologised for raising the issue publicly which caused “so much unnecessary additional distress” instead of bringing the feedback privately to their teachers.

Another series of messages from a different student, also shared by Wake Up Singapore on the same day, had similar complaints about the CARE programme which they felt “was not specialised” to their needs.

“My reason was that it did not even mention the word ‘trauma’ to validate the indirect trauma that many students face (which is recognised by experts in a Straits Times article too), instead portraying it as merely a highly stressful situation,” the student explained.

They went on to say that they did eventually understand more about the work that went into the programme after speaking to a teacher who was a Head of Department at the school.

According to the message, a team of professional counsellors was situated in the Care Centre in the school on Tuesday for anyone to speak to while urgent care was given to students in both the victim’s and assailant’s classes.

At the same time, the student said that teachers were working around the clock, the MOE formulated a specialised care programme lesson plan while the student development team in RVHS formulated slides for the teachers.

When students returned to school on Wednesday, MOE officers were standing by at the school entrance to usher students in and keep journalists from “swarming” them, while the police were on alert as well, the student noted.

They added that teachers were supportive of students and took care to talk to them and ease them back into lessons after the care programme.

In clearing up certain “misconceptions”, the author of the messages described the CARE programme as “very general” and meant to identify affected students to send for counselling.

“Perhaps this has caused some dissatisfaction as it was too simplified for some students and didn’t delve deeper into the impacts we were feeling,” the author suggested.

“The teacher also expressed the same sentiment,” they added.

In hopes of “de-escalating” the developing situation sparked by the earlier complaint about the CARE programme, this student reiterated that the school and teachers have been working hard to support students.

The student said: “All [in] all, what I want to say is that the Teachers and school is working really hard to support us BEHIND THE SCENES, they don’t brag about it, but I’m here to say this so we can show them a little more support and understanding.”

Continue Reading
5 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Comments

LHL’s 15-minute visit to Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake raises eyebrows among Singaporeans

On the evening of 10 October, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, attended Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake, staying for about 10-15 minutes. This brief visit sparked online discussions about the custom of family members remaining throughout the day at funerals.

Published

on

On Thursday evening (10 October), Singapore’s mainstream media, stationed outside Singapore Casket where Dr Lee Wei Ling’s wake was held, reported the arrival of Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, to attend his sister’s funeral.

Dr Lee, the daughter of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, passed away on 9 October at the age of 69, at her family home at 38 Oxley Road.

Her wake is being held at Singapore Casket from 10 October to 12 October.

According to Lianhe Zaobao, SM Lee and Mdm Ho arrived outside Singapore Casket at around 8.30 pm.

They reportedly stayed at the wake for about 10 minutes and did not provide any comments to the media.

In contrast, the South China Morning Post reported that SM Lee and Mdm Ho stayed for approximately 15 minutes before leaving.

A member of the public who paid respects to Dr Lee shared with TOC that SM Lee had written a simple “RIP” in the condolences book.

Mr Li Yipeng, the eldest son of Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, also attended Dr Lee’s wake earlier.

Observing comments on social media, some users questioned the brevity of SM Lee’s visit to his sister’s wake.

One user remarked that even attending a friend’s funeral typically lasts at least 30 minutes, asking, “Where can you find a brother who attends his sister’s funeral for just 15 minutes?”

Others pointed out that it is customary for family members to stay the entire day at a funeral, particularly the eldest brother, who usually greets visitors and offers hospitality, such as refreshments.

“That’s what family members do,” one user noted.

A netizen lamented that instead of receiving guests at his sister’s wake, LHL appeared as a VIP guest accompanied by bodyguards.

Another user expressed sadness over the situation, noting that the eldest brother was attending the wake like any other outsider.

The comment highlighted that Lee Hsien Yang, the younger brother, was organizing the funeral remotely and could not return.

This led to a broader question among netizens: Would LHL attend his own brother’s funeral if he were to pass first?

Some netizens disagreed with the criticism of LHL’s attendance at his sister’s wake, arguing that, regardless of public sentiment towards the government, this is a personal matter.

One comment emphasised the need for objectivity, stating that people cannot judge LHL solely based on appearances or media reports.

He questioned what LHL might have done for his sister behind the scenes and pointed out that even if he had stayed longer, some would still find fault with his actions.

A comment on Reddit expressed that while LHL doesn’t necessarily need to be invited, his absence from receiving mourners as the eldest family member suggests he was not asked or instructed to participate in the funeral proceedings at all.

A netizen lamented that family disputes deeply affect one’s soul, particularly when reconciliation with a sibling is impossible, even in death.

The Reddit comment emphasised the emotional pain that arises from being reminded of happy childhood moments during such difficult times.

 

Continue Reading

Comments

Netizens: Was Ho Ching smirking before entering Dr Lee Wei Ling’s funeral?

On 10 October at around 8.30 PM, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, were spotted arriving at Dr Lee Wei Ling’s funeral. While Singaporeans mourned Dr Lee’s passing, some netizens, after viewing media footage, questioned whether Mdm Ho was smirking before entering the funeral.

Published

on

Dr Lee Wei Ling, the daughter of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, passed away on 9 October at the age of 69, at her family home at 38 Oxley Road.

Lee Hsien Yang (LHY), Dr Lee’s brother, announced her passing on social media, and had earlier requested that the wake and funeral remain a private affair.

He also noted that respects could be paid on a strict queue basis, adding, “There will be no exceptions, not even for VIPs,” to ensure that everyone is treated equally during the visitation period.

The wake is being held at the Pearl & Sapphire Hall of Singapore Casket, located at 131 Lavender Street, Singapore. Public visitation is open from 2 PM to 10 PM on 10 October, and from 10 AM to 10 PM on 11 October. The final visitation period is scheduled for 10 AM to 1 PM on 12 October.

Despite the request for privacy, mainstream media (MSM) representatives have gathered outside the Singapore Casket building.

MSM reporters are focused on whether Dr Lee’s elder brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, will attend her funeral.

On Thursday (10 October ) at around 8.30pm, MSM spotted Senior Minister Lee and his wife, Ho Ching, entering Singapore Casket.

SM Lee and His Wife Attended the Wake for Approximately 10 Minutes

According to Lianhe Zaobao, SM Lee and his wife stayed at the wake for about 10 minutes and did not provide any comments to the media.

Comments on social media pages of various media outlets show Singaporeans pouring in with condolence messages, remembering Dr Lee’s contributions to Singapore’s medical field.

They praised her as a low-profile and modest woman, despite being a President’s Scholar and the Head of the Neurology Department.

Many noted how much she resembled her mother, who also shunned the limelight, even at their funerals.

However, some netizens, after viewing videos and photos taken by mainstream media, questioned whether Mdm Ho Ching was smirking before entering Dr Lee’s funeral.

Netizens Urge Media and Public to Give Grieving Family Space

Some netizens disagreed with the speculation surrounding Mdm Ho Ching’s expression in the media footage, urging others to refrain from making unfounded assumptions.

They called for compassion, emphasizing the need to give the grieving family some space.

Some netizens also recalled the Lee family feud surrounding the 38 Oxley Road house, where Dr Lee and LHY accused their brother, SM Lee, of opposing their father’s wish to have the house demolished after his passing.

One netizen lamented the strained relationship within the Lee family, questioning why there was supposed to be a sense of family, yet it felt more like guests attending the wake.

Another commented on the fact that SM Lee and his wife attended the wake rather than being involved in arranging it, especially given that Dr Lee was unmarried and their parents are no longer around, “it says alot about their relationship.”

One netizen speculated that Dr Lee might be SM Lee’s greatest regret in life, as he had failed to mend his relationship with her.

The comment added, “Attend or not attend his sister’s wake doesn’t really matter since the person had already gone.”

Meanwhile, some netizens questioned the media’s actions, pointing out that despite LHY’s request for no media coverage, reporters were still camping outside Dr Lee’s funeral.

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending