A cashier order of S$262,327.22 was hand-delivered to lawyers of Singapore Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong on Monday, for the payment of damages, legal cost and disbursement in a defamation suit filed against Mr Leong Sze Hian, a blogger and financial adviser.

Mr Lim Tean, counsel for Mr Leong posted this as an update on his Facebook page and shared the letter accompanying the cashier order.

Both visited the Guoco building where Davinder Singh Chambers is situated at, to hand the cashier order over to the law firm.

The letter attached reads:

Dear Sirs,

Please found our client’s DBS cashiers order for the amount of $262,327.22 being full and final payment of the damages together with legal costs and disbursements awarded to your client.

Your client will be aware that every cent of this amount was donated to our client by the people of Singapore in an epic demonstration of their condemnation and anger at your clients use of the libel laws to silence and chill dissent.

It was conduct unbefitting of a Prime Minister.

The courageous citizens of Singapore were determined not to allow your client the satisfaction of suing critics until their pants drop.

Your client may have won in a court of law, but this cashiers order is proof that he has lost decisively in the court of public opinion.

As of 9.38pm on Saturday, Mr Leong managed to raise the full sum of S$262,327 to pay off the Singapore Prime Minister for the damages, legal cost and disbursement in a defamation suit filed by the latter — two days ahead of the deadline for payment set by PM Lee’s lawyers.

On 10 May, the High Court granted the full claim of legal cost and disbursement, totalling S$129,327 to PM Lee. This is on top of the S$133,000 awarded to PM Lee in March this year for purpose of damages.

“Having considered the arguments of the parties, the Court is satisfied that the appropriate costs payable by the Defendant is as follows: Costs of $50,000 to the Plaintiff plus disbursements claimed of $79,327.22.” wrote the court in a letter addressed to both parties on Monday (10 May).

Subsequently on 12 May, lawyers for PM Lee gave a deadline of 17 May for Mr Leong Sze Hian to pay up the full $262,357 for the damages, cost and disbursements ordered by the court in the defamation suit between the two.

Prior to the lawyers’ announcement of the deadline, Mr Leong managed to raise $65,032 over the span of 26 days. This meant that he had to raise a sum of S$64,295 within the next five days.

Mr Leong had previously successfully raised the full damage of S$133,000 awarded to PM Lee through a crowd funding campaign in 11 days.

For unknown reasons, Mr Leong was barred by Facebook from sharing links on his Facebook page and to other FB groups till 18 May. No report was being made by the media on the deadline given by the Prime Minister as well.

Fortunately, he has had support from friends and party members to share updates on the status of the crowd funding via various Facebook groups and social messaging platforms on a regular basis over the past few days.

In his Facebook post announcing the success of his fundraising, Mr Leong wrote: “I am very very grateful for your support, concern and encouragement, over these two and a half years!”

Roy Ngerng, blogger and activist who had also been sued by PM Lee in the past, commented on the success and wrote, “You are amazing, Singaporeans, we have just conducted a 2-month long resistance to stand by the people who have spoken up for us.”

Ngerng had earlier managed to raise the full outstanding damage of $125,000 owning to PM Lee last month and transferred the excess of the crowd funding campaign to Mr Leong this week.

Mr Leong in a livestream event on last Saturday, said that he will continue speaking up for Singaporeans despite what he had gone through, especially since the support that he had gotten from the people.

Background to Leong’s defamation case

Mr Leong was sued by PM Lee in 2018 for defamation over a Facebook share of an article alleging PM Lee’s involvement in the 1MDB scandal.

The blogger did not attach or insert any commentary at the time he shared the article.

Mr Leong took down the article at 7.30 am on 10 November 2018 after being instructed by the Info-communications Media Development Authority (IMDA) to do so a day prior.

Prior to his removal of the post on 10 November, the court noted that Mr Leong’s article had garnered “22 ‘reactions’, five ‘comments’, and 18 ‘shares’”.

Just last month, the High Court ordered Mr Leong to pay PM Lee S$133,000 for defamation, which includes S$100,000 in general damages and S$33,000 in aggravated damages.

The amount of damages was made in reference to another blogger, Roy Ngerng’s case.

Justice Aedit found that the defamatory statement in the article shared by Mr Leong was worse compared to allegations made in Mr Ngerng’s case.

On 23 Apr, Mr Leong decided not to appeal against the High Court judgement in the case, as there is “no greater verdict” than that of the people of Singapore.

In a statement released through his lawyer Lim Tean’s firm Carson Law Chambers on Friday (23 Apr), Mr Leong said that the love and support he received from the people of Singapore “is far more valuable” to him than any possible successful appeal to a higher court.

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SMRT和新捷运 向公交理事会提呈调整车资申请

据报导,本地两家地铁经营者SMRT和新捷运,在昨日(23日)向公共交通理事会 (PTC)提交车资调整的申请。 此前,该理事会称今年调涨上限为七巴仙,并解释影响新一轮车资调涨顶限的最大因素,是能源价格出现双位数增长。2017年,能源价格上涨26.2巴仙,去年则达到32.3巴仙。 新捷运对媒体称,由于维修与保养成本提高,地铁营运成本一直增加。“虽然乘客量攀升,但新捷运地铁业务仍持续亏损。” SMRT地铁首席执行长李遴伟则指出,2019财年该公司在维修等相关支出,占地铁车资营收71巴仙,比2018财年的62巴仙更高。 “基于全面加强维修力度,公司总营运成本已超出车资收入,而这是不可持续的。” 不过他表示,该公司仍会致力做好成本管理,包括采用源自日本的“改善”(kaizen)管理策略,促进生产力也节约浪费,并善用科技。 至于公共巴士方面,基于在合约模式下巴士服务仍有陆交局掌管,料巴士费未受影响,而陆交局将提供公交理事会相关巴士业务的财务资讯,以协助检讨车资。 据《海峡时报》报导,公交理事会须在今年最后三个月,宣布最新的年度车资调整。 今年7月,交通部长许文远在国会上指出,政府目前补贴超过30巴仙的公共交通运营,并表示有需要在四年内提升票价来维持津贴。 “2016年至2017年期间,铁路网络的运营成本,增加了约2亿7000万元。”他也指出,铁路公司在亏本经营,在最近的一个财政年度,新加坡地铁公司(SMRT)亏损8600万元,新捷运(SBS Transit)的轻轨部门也面对着数千万元的亏损。 去年12月底,地铁和公共巴士车资调涨,以车资卡付费的成人车资,每趟车程调涨6分;现金付费的成人巴士车资及地铁单程车资则调涨1角。…

Alleged conman attacks 72-year-old man when he tried to protect his neighbour from getting cheated; Police asks him to make a magistrate’s complain

On Saturday (23 March), a 72-year-old man shared on his Facebook account…

利用性爱视频敲诈前女友伴侣 男子被判入狱16周并罚款

男子假冒贪污调查局官员,诱骗前女友的现任伴侣,被判入狱16周以及罚款1万元。 前女友将内有性爱视频硬碟托付给这名27岁男子,要他交给警方;此外,也涉嫌假冒贪污调查局官员获得性爱视频,并对前女友伴侣进行敲诈,涉嫌冒充罪、刑事恐吓及非法赌博三项罪行。 根据调查显示,男子至少拥有三种以上的假身份,但由于保护受害者身份,因此将不具名。 事情经过 26岁女子A与被告分手后,与另一名28岁男子B交往,B先生拥有一家中介移民公司。 2017年12月中旬,A女子意识到B男与他人有染,在发现到B的出轨行为后,便要求B男与小三分手。虽然表面上B男坚称与小三仅同事关系;殊不知在同月下旬,A再度发现B的出轨行为,以及与其他女子的性爱视频。 A女对B感到绝望,决定将性爱视频交给被告,而且也告诉被告,小三可能提供B男业务对手机密信息。 为保自身安全,她决定将这些资料交由被告,并由被告转交警方。 转手获得性爱视频,却将之拿来威胁现男友 殊不知,被告竟然没有将这些资料交给警方,反而是要来威胁B男子。2018年1月9日,被告先是冒充了贪污调查局官员,联系了B男小三,并指控她披露公司客户信息属违法,但也要求会面商讨解决办法。 然而,在同事的提醒下,贪污调查局的官员并不会私底下安排见面,小三才起疑并报警处理。 东窗事发,被告转向B先生,于同年2月19日向B男子进行勒索,他向B男子自称是来自贪污调查局的“佛罗德”、法律顾问“安”是以及小三公司主要投资者“罗德”。…

Former NCMP Gerald Giam call for an increase in frequency of buses and trains to reduce congestion and implement social distancing

In a Facebook post on Monday (23 March), former Non-Constituency Member of…