About six hours after receiving his first COVID-19 vaccination on 18 April, her 48-year-old brother-in-law started feeling “very weak and giddy”, and had to be taken to the hospital via an ambulance, said a netizen on Facebook.

In a post on Thursday (22 April), Jo-ann Tan said that after being admitted to Changi General Hospital, the family was informed that her brother-in-law had suffered a stroke and has lost vision in both eyes. They did not know if the loss of vision was permanent or temporary.

After some medical intervention, Ms Tan said that his condition continued to deteriorate, leading to an endotracheal tube being inserted. He was moved to the MICU that same night.

Ms Tan recalled, “19 April, we were told a CT scan will be done on that night and if all good, they will remove the endotracheal tube the next day.”

“20 April, he suffered his third stroke, while still on endotracheal tube and heavily drugged.”

The doctor has informed the family on the evening of 20 April that his condition was worse and told all immediate family members to visit him.

Ms Tan the noted the irony of the family having trouble getting in to visit him due to COVID-19 protocols.

She said, “I begged the counter staff to help as this could be the last time we are seeing him alive. How I wished I have someone from the hospital support team to help us in such challenging time. We were all alone.”

Ms Tan went on to say that a decision then had to be made on whether to send him for emergency brain surgery to reduce the pressure building up, though there was a “30%” risk that he could die on the operating table.

Again, Ms tan noted how alone the distraught family felt, saying, “No one from the Covid Vaccination emergency team was with us. Maybe there is no such team to begin with.”

Fortunately, Ms Tan’s brother-in-law survived the operation.

The next day, Ms Tan said she tried to contact the COVID Vaccination Emergency hotline she found online for support.

She recalled, “I was first asked if he has underlying medical condition and I should instead raised a[n] issue ticket with HSA.”

She then questioned, “Actually it makes me wonder, underlying medical condition; what about those who doesn’t do medical checkup and doesn’t even know if they have underlying medical condition?

“They are just walking time bomb but a small injection may cause adverse reaction. Are our checks sufficient?”

She went on to highlight that the government has assured the people that the COVID-19 vaccine would be safe for a majority of the population, with extreme cases being at only 0.3 percent.

She added, “He is unlucky but it can happen to anyone. This is real and it is reality that we do not get any support or assistance from the ministry,” and asked, “Where is the gap?”

She continued, “The protocol seems right on social distancing but when the 0.3% suffered an adverse reaction (whom we were told usually recovered) nothing was done even when I reach out. I even tried reaching out to MPs and only one asked for my email address but nothing else.”

Noting that the hospital had confirmed with her that the Ministry of Health (MOH) is informed of her brother-in-law’s case, she wondered, “Are there many such cases that the ministry is so busy managing?”

“I only asked for warm bodies to assure us the government is doing their best to help this very unique adverse reaction case. Even to send a brain specialist to access and monitor him just to assure the family that the government cares not just say only.”

For now, Ms Tan said that the family is worried about the mounting medical bills, as her brother-in-law has since been transferred to the SICU and they are not sure if he would ever recover.

“What about his post-surgery treatment and recovery? Will this be paid for by the government or we are on our own since he did not develop any side effect while he was at the facility?”

She added, “If both eye vision are lost, he will not be able to work. He is only 48 years old, what should he do?”

In response to queries from TOC, the Ministry of Health (MOH) said on Friday (23 April) that they are aware of Ms Tan’s feedback and are currently looking into the matter.

On the same day, Changi General Hospital said in a statement on its Facebook page that its care team is “committed to and focused on providing care and support for its patients,” adding that it has reached out to the family.

CGH also said, “Our preliminary assessment does not indicate COVID-19 vaccination as the cause,” and noted that it is unable to comment further “out of respect for patient confidentiality.”

The next day on 24 April, Ms Tan posted an response to CGH via a new Facebook page dedicated to the issue called “Is it really safe?“. In the post, she asked for an explanation on who determined that her brother-in-law’s medical condition is unrelated to the vaccine.

She said, “The neurosurgeon doesn’t even know my BIL had his vaccine until yesterday, but yesterday, you told the media it is not related. Please reach out to family for a discussion.”

She then questioned the hospital’s claim that they had reached out to the family, asking “did you go to the right patient?”

Ms Tan noted that she knows of another patient in SICU who suffered a cardiac arrest after his second jab. His first heart attack, she said, adding his daughter had approached her. She asked if CGH spoke to the correct family.

She went on to say, “Met the neurosurgeon and ICU doctor and had a very detailed discussion on my [brother-in-law’s] condition. I will not share further, it will be a very long journey ahead. Now is to save his life first.”

Ms Tan then said she requested for an explanation of why her brother-in-law had such an adverse reaction after being vaccinated. She said the doctors told her that “they don’t determine if these strokes have relation with the vaccine,” that it is the hospital who would look into it.

Though she asked to speak to the panel of doctors who assessed her brother-in-law, Ms Tan said no one had responded to her yet at the time, adding that the neurosurgeon only just found out yesterday that he had his vaccine.

In another update on that same post on the same day, Ms tan thanked a staff nurse named Glen who helped her call up the panel of doctors and arrange a meeting with the family.

Ms Tan listed out her two hopes for the near future, the first being that the brain and cardiovascular specialists would assess her brother-in-law to provide a second opinion.

Her next hope is for the government to take care of all the medical expenses, current and future, related to this issue so that they can focus on getting well instead of worrying about mounting bills. She said, “I pray government will give us this privilege just to assure everyone reading my post that even when shit happens, our government cares.”

The next day on 25 April, Ms Tan posted another update on that new Facebook page. She noted that her brother-in-law is more responsive today. She added that CGH had approved her request for a second opinion and is facilitating it, adding that the neurosurgeon agreed that a second opinion may help.

Ms Tan also said that she is appealing to the MOH to reassess the application criteria for the government Vaccine Injury Financial Assistance Programme (VIFAP).

She wrote, “For any adverse reaction after taking the vaccine, the government will take care of the medical expenses, just like the way you manage Covid admission last year. Of course, it should be Class C subsidies. VIFAP will be reserved for those who lost their ability to work due to permanent disability or death.”

Subscribe
Notify of
64 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

匪徒目标转向新马二道 两小时九人遭掠夺

往返新加坡和新山的电单车骑士,成为掠夺目标,一名骑着大型摩哆车的匪徒在两个小时内抢夺了九人财物。许多受害者在被掠夺或追逐掠夺匪时,电单车失控而受伤。 根据马来西亚柔佛警察总部官方脸书贴文指出,有关的9起攫夺案是在2月25日5时50分至7时15分,在新马第二通道发生。 9名受害者皆是马国公民,年龄介于24岁至36岁,当时有者准备到新加坡上班,有的则是从新加坡返回马国的电单车骑士。攫夺案导致他们各别蒙受1000令吉至2500令吉的财务损失,其中包括大马卡、提款卡、信用卡、现金、工作证件、钥匙和手机等。 其中一名工厂操作员工虽然成功闪避掠夺匪,让对方无法抢走肩上的背包,但是也导致自个的电单车失控,进而跌伤。另有一名受害者因为被掠夺背包受了轻伤,尝试追逐掠夺匪,但是对方已经逃之夭夭。 逮捕一技工嫌犯 依斯干达公主城警区主任祖凯里受访时指出,掠夺匪干案手法如出一撤,受害者在骑着电单车时,被一名骑着红色大型摩哆的掠夺匪趋近强拉背包,或抢走在电单车篮子的包包。 他说,根据受害者描述,掠夺匪身材粗壮和带着眼镜,而且受害者没有看清楚掠夺匪摩哆的车牌号码。 祖凯里表示,警方在2月26日晚上已经逮捕了一名33岁的嫌疑犯。 警方表示,有关的嫌疑犯是在26日半夜12时25分,在古来沙令潘卡西拉花园,瑟鲁乃3路一间店屋内被逮捕。他说,嫌犯是一名技工,将被警方延扣5天至一星期。 警方将援引刑事法典第392条文(抢劫)、第395条文(结伙抢劫)以及第394条文(抢劫伤人)展开调查。

管你使用哪个途径 724入境马国者统统隔离

马来西亚国防部长依斯迈沙比利在今午(7月23日)2时的新闻发布会上指出,无论是透过海、陆、空途径入境该国的人士,就算从新马长堤步行入境的新加坡公民或马国人民,都将被强制送入隔离中心。 他指出,该国政府不再允许居家隔离,而入境者须在政府认证的隔离中心进行隔离14天。 至于入境者是否需要进行冠状病毒拭子检测,他表示,既然所有入境者都必须隔离,那么他们在抵达马国之前,就无需像之前那般,强制进行检测了。 “无论如何,这还是要依循他们出发地点的规矩,若相关国家要求他们在离开之前进行拭子检测,那么他们就必须做。而且,这也要看他们所乘搭的航空公司决定。” 依斯迈沙比利指出,政府允许来自同一个家庭的入境者,在接受强制隔离时同住一间房间。 他表示,比如夫妻、父母在回到马来西亚之前都没有分开,因此隔离时也无需特意安排,而12岁或以下孩童也可以和父母同住一间房间。 但是,在入住同一间房之前,他们必须提呈事前同意文件,“因为我们担心万一发生任何感染,而他们是在事前已交出政府同意书,让他们同住一间房间”。 他也提到,被强制送入隔离中心的民众需要承担两笔费用,即隔离费用和冠毒检测费用。 此外,他也宣布了另一项新措施,8月1日起,凡是在公共场合,如公共交通上,马国民众都必须戴好口罩,否则罚款1000令吉。 他指出,卫生部通报指出,大部分使用公共交通工具的人们已开始疏于防疫,而马国境内重新开始出现感染群,因此必须强制民众戴口罩。 他也鼓励马国民众,可以依据世界卫生组织所制定的标准,自行缝制口罩。

Elderly woman rescued from lake at Bukit Batok Town Park by British tourists, arrested for attempting suicide

On Tuesday morning (24 Sep), a 72-year-old woman was rescued from the…

女佣疑硬喂老人热米粉汤 网友目睹经过发网冀家属关注

将热腾腾的米粉汤往阿嫲嘴里送,轮椅阿嫲一直以福建话“卖呷”(不要吃)示意女佣停止,但却被女佣无视。一旁的食客目睹经过,并将女佣照片照下,希望阿嫲家能多留意。 网友Kat Boey 17日在脸书上发文,称自己目睹了一名女佣疑似粗鲁对待阿嫲的情境,希望阿嫲家人能够多留意。 据网友表示,事情发生在上周日(17日)早上10点50分,位于循环路的熟食中心。 她忆述,当时她正在排队点餐,却发现到有人将轮椅撞到我身旁的桌子旁,而老人一直遮住她的脸,并不停向女佣示意“卖呷”,但女佣一直无视她,继续将热米粉汤送入嘴中,当老人不愿意开嘴,还用汤匙不停推她的嘴巴。 老人一直不停示意女佣说不要,但女佣也只是吹一吹,然后要老人喝下。 “可是阿嫲还没吞下米粉,女佣又再次要喂阿嫲,阿嫲这时也再次挥手说不要,女佣就看似很不高兴,把汤匙和筷子丢在桌上,随后便离开。” 没过多久,女佣再次回到座位,继续尝试用之前丢在桌上的餐具喂阿嫲,阿嫲拒绝不吃,再用很愤怒的语气告诉她不要吃,且当下女佣才意识到周围人在盯着,只好推着老人离开。 目睹整个经过的网友于心不忍,表示若在大庭广众下都可以如此对待老人,很难想象只有俩人在家的时候会是怎么样,因此希望能够借此引起老人家属的关注。 贴文一出也引起许多网友的关注,截至目前已获得4千800次转载,根据网友的最新贴文,表示目前老人家属已经得知此事。