WP MP Louis Chua encourages public to ensure their CPF nomination is in order, following recent encounter with a case which didn't

While the minimum S$15 fee for administrative costs imposed in processing un-nominated Central Provident Fund (CPF) monies is understandable, it is less clear as to why there is a need for a schedule of charges by a percentage based on the amount CPF monies, said Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament Louis Chua.In a Facebook post on Tuesday (20 Apr), the Sengkang GRC MP shared the story of a close friend of his who had lost his father recently and was in the process of carrying out financial and legal procedures, including CPF-related matters.Mr Chua said his friend was informed that his late father had not made a nomination for his CPF monies, meaning that the monies had to be transferred to the Public Trustee. It was only then that the family could make an application for the monies to be distributed among them.At this point, Mr Chua highlighted: “What is less commonly known, however, is that the fees charged by the Public Trustee are based on a percentage of the CPF money, with a schedule of fees involved.”He went on to illustrate this with an example.“If the amount of CPF money is $10,000, the fees would be $159 and if it’s $100,000 it would be $834,” said the MP.Mr Chua also included several images in his post, showing the question he had raised in Parliament on 5 Apr on the matter when he asked how the minimum fee of S$15 and schedule of charges is determined.In response, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam responded that the fee is used to cover the cost of administering un-nominated CPF monies.The Minister said, “This includes resources expended to trace a deceased’s next-of-kin, identify all eligible beneficiaries, and establish the familial relationship between beneficiaries and the deceased.”In his post, Mr Chua had then encouraged the public to ensure that they promptly make their CPF nominations, which can be done online.













