Last Thursday (8 Apr), New Zealand decided to ban all flights from India to New Zealand. The move came after 17 out of 23 new COVID-19 cases were attributed to travellers entering New Zealand from India.

The suspension took place starting from Sunday (11 Apr) to the end of the month (28 Apr).

New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern said while the temporary ban is for India, the decision behind it is not country-specific. “New Zealand is not immune to the virus, especially with a pandemic raging outside our borders,” she said.

She added that the temporary suspension of travel from India was to protect both New Zealand and the travellers themselves. She said she recognised the difficulty the suspension will cause for some citizens attempting to return home.

In response, the Indian community in New Zealand has questioned the New Zealand government’s decision.

“The question of ‘Why India?’ must be asked, and a clear answer should be given,” said Sunil Kaushal, president of the Waitakere Indian Association. He asked why the ruling applied only to India, when other nations including the United States, Brazil, France and the UK had also experienced soaring infection rates, especially when compared on per-capita basis.

“We don’t feel like a part of the ‘team of 5 million’ when Indians are singled out like this,” Kaushal said.

“It’s quite shocking, to be honest,” said Mandeep Bela, of the Indian Workers Association. “Since Covid started, we were told that New Zealand cannot shut its borders to its citizens, regardless of where they are, how many cases there are – they cannot stop them coming back to the country.”

Bela also raised concerns that the singling out of India could prompt a racist backlash. Kaushal shared those concerns, and said he had already observed racist comments being made. “It’s already started – look at the social media streams, listen to talkback radio,” he said.

Ms Ardern on Friday (9 Apr) further noted that more than 60 passengers coming into New Zealand from India had tested positive over the past two weeks. “If that number of people from any country were coming in with Covid that would give us cause to pause and look at mitigation to reduce that risk, so this is not country-specific, this is about the cases we are seeing currently from that region,” she explained.

India is battling a huge wave of coronavirus infections, hitting highest single-day total anywhere in the world currently.

268 imported cases in 11 days

Meanwhile, Singapore continues to open its borders despite having large number of imported COVID-19 cases. Looking at the data provided from Singapore’s Ministry of Health (MOH), there have been a total of 268 imported cases in the 11 days from 1 Apr this month.

Of the 268 imported cases into Singapore, the largest number came from Indian nationals. Bangladeshi came in second while Indonesians third.

The following is a breakdown of the number of imported cases by nationalities from 1 Apr to 11 Apr this month:

  • Indian – 82
  • Bangladeshi -66
  • Indonesian – 29
  • Filipino – 16
  • Burmese – 9
  • Malaysian – 6
  • French – 3
  • British -2
  • American – 2
  • Canadian – 2
  • Ukrainian – 2
  • PNG – 2
  • Brazilian – 1
  • Serbian – 1
  • Japanese – 1
  • Chinese – 1

As for the locals among the imported cases:

  • Singaporean – 16
  • Permanent Residents (PR) – 27

MOH did not breakdown the nationalities of PR who were infected with COVID-19 coming back to Singapore but of the 27, 19 has travelled from India to Singapore.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“What do you do Mr President?”

MARUAH has put together a public forum to continue their key role…

Duty-free allowance for liquor revised to two litres from 1 April 2019

Arriving travellers and returning Singaporeans are reminded that the duty-free allowance for…

罗拔申码头周末人群聚集 网民质问“双标准吗?”

有网民发现,周末下午的罗拔申码头处聚集多人,甚至有人不戴口罩、或近距离交流喝酒,不禁令网民问道,“这是政府的双标准吗?”。 网民Lectress Pat周末(5月16日)在脸书上分享了数张,据称是来自其友人,傍晚6时25分在罗拔申码头拍下的照片。 照片中只见不少人聚集在罗拔申码头一带,有的是一家大小在广场或走道上聊天或跑步,有些人并没运动,却也没戴口罩,甚至没有和他人保持安全社交距离。其中一张照片中,更见到三个人在一家酒吧外喝酒聊天,且都没有用口罩遮盖口鼻。 网友表示,友人当时打算尝试新的运动路线,却没想到会看到这惊人的一幕。 她指出,在亚历山大公园连道有两名执法人员和一名警员驻守,但是在五分钟路程外的罗拔申码头却没有执法人员驻守。更甚的是,该区的餐饮业者也没有劝阻在该处饮酒聊天的人们,也没有把摆放在外的站立式桌子收起。 她表示,这些照片不禁让人们质疑,执法当局对于本地的组屋居民等市民都密切监督,并采取快速的对付行动,却能让这些俗称“拥有自主权”地区的居民不戴口罩和聚集,“这不是双重标准吗?”。 她也批评这些不遵守阻断措施的任性行为,是毁掉本地社区和前线人员所做出的防疫努力。 Lectress Pat的帖文很快引起网民们的关注,议论纷纷。一名餐饮业者在脸书上澄清,指照片中显示的站立式桌子并非该店所有,也强调遵守阻断措施的重要性。 市区重建局发言人则告知媒体,当该局执法人员在相关地区进行巡逻时,发现除了有些餐厅向顾客出售外带酒精饮料之外,并没有发现有很多业者或人们不遵守安全距离措施。 基于出售外带酒精饮料会导致更多人聚集在相关商店周围,为了避免人们聚集,当局已经向业者发出书面指示,即日起禁止出售相关饮料,否则将遭到严厉对付。…

Future of foreign students left hanging if they fail to secure employment after multiple attempts

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused countless damaging effects in Singapore, especially on…