While Singapore is alarmed over the escalating violence in Myanmar, it will not interfere in its domestic affairs as the fate of the country lies in the hand of its people, said Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan.

Dr Balakrishnan said this during his visit to Fujian on Wednesday (31 Mar) for a meeting with China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

In an interview with the media following his meeting with Mr Wang, Dr Balakrishnan called for the military authorities in Myanmar to “act with restraint (to) de-escalate the violence”.

The same sentiment is shared by his Chinese counterpart, as both countries agree on the importance of respecting the “principle of non-interference in domestic matters” in Myanmar.

“Ultimately, the fate and the future of Myanmar lies in the hands of its own people. We can try to help – ASEAN, the UN certainly tried to help – in a constructive, non-interfering way, but in a way that allows dialogue to occur,” Dr Balakrishnan said.

He also shared that both China and Singapore hope that the tensions in Myanmar will de-escalate and for political dialogue to take place soon.

Myanmar has been in turmoil since the military ousted civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi from power in a coup in February that triggered a nationwide uprising as protesters call for a return to democracy.

So far, more than 500 people have been killed in the anti-coup protests as security forces have deployed tear gas, rubber bullets and live rounds against protesters.

On 4 Feb, the Singapore government said that it is “deeply concerned” about the latest developments in Myanmar.

“Myanmar and Singapore share close bilateral economic ties, and we have ongoing investment projects and business interests in Myanmar. We will monitor the situation closely,” said a government spokesperson.

Singapore was listed as the largest foreign investor in Myanmar by the World Bank last year, accounting for 34 per cent of overall approved investment. Hong Kong came second with 26 per cent.

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) commitments into Myanmar were worth US$5.5 billion in the 2020 fiscal year, which ended in September, as reported by BBC.

The Global New Light of Myanmar reported last October that about 20 Singapore-listed enterprises brought in US$1.85 billion into Myanmar in the past financial year 2019-2020, making it the top source of foreign investment in the country.

Myanmar protestors have called for the boycott of some Singaporean F&B brands, such as Tiger Beer and Ya Kun Kaya Toast, the reason being that “Singapore is not supporting the voices of Myanmar people”.

Protesters have also urged people to boycott businesses that are linked to the military.

Mixed reactions from netizens

Over on social media, online users have expressed mixed reactions toward Singapore’s non-interference stance.

Some of them said that they are “disappointed” with what Dr Balakrishnan said, adding that the violence in Myanmar is damaging the citizens of Myanmar.

One user particular noted that he is “upset” that the Singapore government agreed with “China on the non-interference of Myanmar violence”.

“If you see a parent trying to kill their kid by hanging them off the cliff of a building, would you stop by and save the kid or would you not interfere at all? Let alone parents beating their children. We would all stop by to help because that’s who we are and what’s Singapore culture all about,” the user noted.

However, others opined that it is best for Singapore to not interfere in Myanmar’s domestic affairs as “Myanmar (is) not our problem”.

One user said abstaining from interference serves to “safeguard Singapore so that foreign powers can’t influence how Singapore leaders run our country”.

Another warned about a possible “domino effect” that might result from military intervention, which would have disastrous consequences for Singapore should the Myanmar junta decide to retaliate.

Subscribe
Notify of
32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore National Eye Centre vows to cut charges for complex procedures after S$4.50 MediShield Life fiasco

The Singapore National Eye Centre (SNEC) has promised to review and make…

“Dog-whistling” and “pitch-forking” only serves to alienate, says Prof Donald Low

The “scurrilous” attack on Workers’ Party (WP) chief and MP Pritam Singh…

Leaked Audio: Since Jan 2019, PAP has been worried about PSP’s Dr Tan Cheng Bock and Lee Hsien Yang, SDP’s Tan Jee Say, Workers’ Party

Long before the General Election (GE) was called on 23 June 2020,…

人流量和配合度仍是防疫关键 医疗专家分析去看戏、亲友聚会仍是高风险活动

政府声称冠状病毒19社区确诊病例有减少趋势,政府也表示会在下个月开始逐渐放宽阻断措施。 然而,人们有必要认清,即使放宽措施后,有些活动仍含有“高风险”的传染率,但是人数和人群配合度还是关键。 据《联合早报》所采访的数名传染病专家,包括伊丽莎白诺维娜医院传染科医生梁浩楠以及新加坡国立大学苏瑞福公共卫生学院副院长(研究)古阿烈副教授(Alex Cook)等,将各种活动依据传染风险区分,让民众了解以及避免举办或参与有关活动。 专家们认为10人以上的大型活动,如亲友聚会、电影院、健身房、酒吧和按摩院等皆属于“高风险”活动;到理发店、美甲店或在餐饮场所堂食属“中等风险”;而去超市、巴刹、购物商场或公园等则属于“低风险”活动。 然而专家们提醒,有关的风险级别区分是非常主观的,并非绝对标准。 鹰阁医药中心传染病专科医生黄乘佑指出,不能以相关的区别为标准,因若在风险低的场合出现任何举止行为出格的人,那么传染率的风险还是会随着提高;在挤满人潮的体育馆观看赛事属于高风险,但是若限制人数,确保安全距离,球员们也没有相互拥抱等近距离动作,风险也会随着降低。 他认为限制个别场所的人流,将能够控制染病风险,比如限制餐厅食客的逗留时间,健身房也要时常为器材消毒等。 梁浩楠医生则指出,人数多少以及是否保持安全距离,是冠毒传播的效率关键,因此除了物体表面的接触,一些社交行为如拥抱、唱歌和握手等行为也会增加传播风险。虽然有专家指去超市或湿巴刹、零售商店等属低风险活动,但是他认为这些场所的室内空气流通不良,病毒的存活率就会偏高,因此他认为这类场所的风险应该属中等级别。 古阿烈副教授对于逐步开放不同活动之举表示赞同,他指出,目前在冠状病毒传染方面的研究仍然不够充分,若能够量化每项活动的风险,自然就依据安排活动的恢复时段。 惟,他指出,放宽阻断措施,传染率也有可能会提高,若染病率增加了,我国或许需要再次推行病毒阻断措施。