Source: Damanhuri Bin Abas / Facebook

The ban on tudung for Muslim women working in uniformed sectors such as nursing in public health institutions could contribute to the loss of local talent in such fields, said the Singapore Democratic Party’s Damanhuri Abas.

In a Facebook post on Sunday (21 Mar), Mr Damanhuri, who contested in Marsiling-Yew Tee GRC in last year’s general election, narrated the story of his sister, who emigrated from Singapore after working as a nurse at the Singapore General Hospital for more than a decade.

“She and her husband were both nurses. She worked as a nurse in SGH from 1992. She had to make this hard choice and painful decision after coping for many years as a nurse removing her tudung to observe the dress requirements imposed on her,” he said.

Abiding by the tudung ban in her profession, said Mr Damanhuri, was “a daily sacrifice for an honest income to perform her professional role as a nurse”.

“She had believed and waited for many years that the policy would change but was disappointed,” he added.

Eventually, his sister and her husband took up Australian citizenship — a move branded by Mr Damanhuri as a loss for Singapore.

“On this note, I personally reach out to our Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to seriously consider this view and feedback I share and relook the policy,” he said.

Mr Damanhuri also noted that he has “decided to also explore the legal route” in pushing for the tudung ban to be reevaluated.

“At least, I know I will have exhausted all means possible here. I will seek help and advice from members of the legal fraternity whom I will be approaching to move this forward.”

“I also humbly hope for the understanding and support from everyone in Singapore for this effort I am embarking on, regardless of race or religion,” he said.

Mr Damanhuri highlighted the plight of Muslim women who are faced with a difficult choice between having full freedom to practice their faith and to secure employment amid “a dismal job market”.

“All the while, we patiently acknowledged the reasoning given to continue this discriminatory policy against our womenfolk who wanted to be a nurse or had nursing as their passion.

“They diligently observe the uniform by having their headdress removed in order to work, even though it is against their belief. Also, those waiting to be one, should they now know that they will be allowed to wear their tudung as part of the nurse uniform,” he lamented.

“Even if it does not want to budge from its core reasoning, surely it must have some sympathy to bend it somewhat to cater to those who sincerely do seek employment in the health sector,” Mr Damanhuri added.

Lifting tudung ban for nurses in public healthcare could expand local pool of nurses, says Workers’ Party MP Faisal Manap

Minister-in-charge for Muslim Affairs Masagos Zulkifli on 8 Mar reiterated the Singapore government’s secular stance on the issue of allowing Muslim women to wear the tudung in uniformed professions such as nursing and the police force.

The sensitive nature of such issues necessitates “closed-door discussions” and consultations with the community, said Mr Masagos during a debate in Parliament on the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth’s budget for Muslim affairs for the upcoming financial year.

Aljunied GRC and Workers’ Party Member of Parliament (MP) Faisal Manap had earlier asked the Government whether it would reevaluate its ban on the religious headgear for women working in uniformed services, stating that the rule has prevented many Muslim women from taking up such roles.

Allowing nurses to wear the hijab at work, thus, could expand the local pool of nurses, he illustrated.

Mr Masagos in his response said that allowing the donning of the tudung “would introduce a very visible religious marker that identifies every tudung-wearing female nurse or uniformed officer as a Muslim”.

“This has significant implications: We do not want patients to prefer or not prefer to be served by a Muslim nurse, nor do we want people to think that public security is being enforced by a Muslim or non-Muslim police officer.”

“This is what makes the decision difficult and sensitive,” said Mr Masagos.

It would be difficult to achieve compromise under the weight of “public aggressive pressure”, which is why a closed-door approach must be maintained when discussing such matters, said Mr Masagos.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office and Second Minister for Education and Foreign Affairs, Maliki Osman expounded on Mr Masagos’ views on the Government’s secularist standpoint, saying that uniforms are meant to project neutrality and a common identity.

In the case of nurses and other public healthcare workers, he said that a uniform “underscores” the concept that such professionals “provide impartial care regardless of race or religion”.

He also cited the opinion of Ahmed Al-Tayyeb, the grand imam of the world-renowned Al-Azhar University, who had advised Muslim women to not leave their jobs solely out of being prohibited from wearing the hijab due to workplace requirements.

Mr Faisal had asked why opposition MPs such as himself are not included in closed-door discussions concerning such matters.

Dr Maliki replied that “whether Mr Faisal Manap participates in these sessions or not, I think the most important thing is a large segment of the community has been consulted and we continue to consult them”.

Mr Faisal highlighted that Muslim policewomen and nurses in countries like Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom are now allowed to wear the hijab in their respective countries while serving.

Mr Masagos responded that there are “many things that other countries do that we do not do”.

“We are Singaporeans; we will do what is good … If you want to do something that they like, we must also then do what we don’t like that they do. I don’t think we want that either. We do what is good for us, our community, and our nation,” he added.

RDU’s Liyana Dhamirah questions Govt on how many tudung-wearing women were represented in its closed-door meetings

Earlier this month, Red Dot United Party’s Liyana Dhamirah, a Muslim woman who dons the hijab herself, questioned how it is possible to hold the government accountable if it would not answer for its policies in Parliament, particularly “a policy which affects a significant number of minority women” such as the tudung ban in uniformed professions.

In a statement on 9 Mar, she also questioned — as an individual who has a vested interest in the matter — how many tudung-wearing women were represented in the government’s closed-door meetings, and if so, what percentage did they comprise.

“I agree with RDU’s suggestion that our Government commissions surveys and dialogues to gather the people’s views on how Singaporeans feel about Muslim women wearing hijab in public sector uniformed offices which currently prohibit it. I am certain there can be a way forward that opens up these job opportunities for more Singaporeans,” said Ms Liyana.

Any discrimination involving prohibition against wearing the tudung “a serious violation” of right to equality, special provisions for Malays as S’pore’s indigenous people: Lawyer M Ravi

Human rights lawyer M Ravi highlighted that any discrimination involving the prohibition on wearing the tudung is “a serious violation” of Article 15(1) of the Constitution, which guarantees the right of every person in Singapore to “profess and practise” their religion “and to propagate it”.

It is also in violation of Article 12, which guarantees equality, he added. This must be seen side-by-side with the “non-discrimination of Sikhs wearing turbans”.

Article 12 also prohibits any discrimination in public office on the grounds of race or religion.

Mr Ravi added that Article 152 guarantees the special position of the Malays and their culture and religion as the indigenous people of Singapore, which consequently means that the government has a duty to uphold the constitutional rights of Malay-Muslim women who wish to wear the tudung.

Prohibition of tudung in frontlines of govt agencies, public schools continues to be a mainstay in S’pore’s policies

The Singapore government, to this date, prohibits the wearing of headscarves by students on public school grounds.

Nearly two decades ago, three primary schoolgirls were suspended from their respective schools for continuing to wear their tudung to school despite previous reminders against doing so.

Following the schoolgirls’ families’ decision to sue the Singapore government over their daughters’ predicament at the time, lawyer Sadari Musari told Reuters in April 2002: “The directive given by the Ministry (of Education) to the school principals not to allow these three daughters, school children to put on their headscarves—it’s unconstitutional.”

The schoolgirls’ suspension sparked a heated Parliamentary debate on the right of Muslim girls and women to wear the hijab in Singapore’s public schools, and on a larger scale, the Republic’s frontlines of government or government-linked offices, as seen with Muslim female police officers and nurses.

Mr Faisal, during a motion on the “Aspirations of Singapore Women” on 4 April 2017, called upon Parliament to “not exclude Muslim women who wish to fulfil their career aspirations in line with their religious obligations”.

Citing countries that have permitted Muslim women serving in uniformed organisations to wear headscarves such as Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, Mr Faisal questioned as to when Singapore would move to do the same for the Home Team and the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

“As a Singapore Muslim, a husband as well as a father to a daughter, I appeal to the Government to make into reality this call for inclusiveness that is often heard in this Chamber,” he added.

Mr Masagos, in response, branded Mr Faisal’s approach “worrisome”.

“He [Mr Faisal] has used this motion, which is focused on the aspirations of all women in Singapore, to raise again the issue of the tudung, to focus on differences instead of rallying people to be united.

“He dwells on issues that can injure or hurt the feelings of the community rather than to inspire them. In fact, Mr Faisal Manap has used many occasions to raise potentially discordant issues in this House,” Mr Masagos retorted.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in a Facebook post later rebuked Mr Faisal’s move to raise the issue in Parliament.

“WP MP Faisal Manap brought up the tudung issue again. Minister Masagos Zulkifli challenged Mr Faisal and explained why this was unwise. He spoke with courage and conviction.

“Championing divisive issues publicly, to pressure the government and win communal votes, will only stir up emotions and damage our multi-racial harmony,” he said.

Changes to the status quo should be introduced over time rather than “being pushed for in terms of rights and entitlements”: Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on tudung issue

In 2014, TODAY reported PM Lee as saying that it has always been within the Government’s policy to ensure that racial and/or religious minorities in Singapore are able to practice their culture and creed as freely as possible.

However, he opined that changes to the status quo should be introduced gradually and broadly rather than “being pushed for in terms of rights and entitlements” at the expense of the Republic’s national harmony.

In response to questions regarding when the Government will be ready to allow Malay-Muslim frontline officers in public service to wear the headscarf, Mr Lee said: “You never arrive. Over the last ten years, we have gradually moved. Nobody has really noticed.”

Mr Lee also noted that there had been an increase in corporate officers working for statutory boards who don the tudung.

“I think that’s really the way to go … This is not the sort of thing where you want to put all your attention on this item and measure the progress of, either racial relations or the progress of the Muslim community based on this one item,” he added.

More recently, President Halimah Yacob said in Aug last year that discrimination “of any form and against anyone has no place at all in our society and, most certainly, not at the workplace”.

“People should be assessed solely on their merits and their ability to do a job and nothing else. Discrimination at the workplace is particularly disturbing because it deprives the person affected from earning a living.

“During this COVID-19 period when concerns over jobs and livelihoods are greater, incidents of discrimination exacerbate anxieties and people feel threatened.

“Diversity is our strength and our society has already embraced it. I hope that employers too will fully embrace diversity at the workplace and do their part to uphold the values of a fair and open society,” said Mdm Halimah.

Mdm Halimah was criticised for her purported silence on an incident involving pop-up booth promoter Nurin Jazlina Mahbob, who was allegedly asked by two managers to remove her headscarf to continue working at Tangs department store.

Tudung is the Malay word for hijab, an Arabic term that means “barrier”. It is a “headscarf” or “veil” often worn by Muslim girls and women to cover their hair, necks and chests as a means to demonstrate piety to God.

Mainstream interpretations of Islamic dress code suggest that the hijab is only obligatory for Muslim girls upon reaching puberty, which usually takes place in their early- or mid-teen years. However, some Muslim parents enforce the tudung on their daughters at an earlier age.

There are also many Muslim women who begin wearing the hijab past puberty out of their personal will after making a personal hijrah — a form of spiritual migration or transformation.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens criticise MP Carrie Tan’s characterization of social workers with degrees having less “natural empathy”

Ahead of Monday’s (13 Sept) Parliamentary sitting, MP for Nee Soon GRC…

MOH Group Director: No Singaporean will be denied medical care if they can't pay

A member of the public Tan Keong Boon wrote to ST Forum…

“养儿防老已不足以应付” 陈硕茂吁护理开销让有需求者负担得起

国会昨日三读通过《终身护保和长期护理法案》,终身护保计划将在明年推出,希望能从重度残障保险、个人储蓄和政府资助上,协助国人应付长期护理开销。 工人党阿裕尼集选区议员陈硕茂,在昨日参与国会辩论时指出,认为上述法案朝着正确方向,因为过去人说养儿防老,但在迈向人口老龄化的社会,养老挑战将更严峻,单单靠孩子已然不足。 “去年,国会讨论终身护保委员会报告时,我说过计划本身能自我持续,但是细节仍待规划,例如如何援助付不起保费的国人,也能纳入计划内?” 陈硕茂续问,我们的社会政策方向、愿景是什么?他引述《礼记》:大道之行也… 故人不独亲其亲,不独子其子,使老有所终,废疾者皆有所养。 他认为,借助风险分担关心无法自理老人和残障人士,让大家能以较低的保费,买到较高赔付额的保障,而所幸有关法案能给予合理框架,确保老有所终,废疾者皆有所养。 在终身护保下,老人因衰老、中风、失智等,六项日常活动中(冲凉、进食、更衣、如厕、走动和移动),至少三项不能自理,每月可获得约600元作为长期护理费,直到康复为止。 但陈硕茂提醒,法案以外的工作仍待规划和落实。而600元的辅助,也要考量是否足以应付、承担得了诸如聘请女佣、护理费用、疗养院、社区看护等开销?而这些市面上的护理服务价格又是否合理,让有需求者负担得起?

N水准考生击退生活困难 获工教院有条件录取

“即使现在仍然经历困难,但还能保持如同当兵一样坚毅的心,在过去两年中,坚持过来。” 这是一名仅17岁的女孩努兰(Nurain Sanusi)的心情,也是一直支撑她挺过生活上所有苦难。 上周N水准考试成绩放榜,共有9千752名普通(学术)源流考生参加考试,其及格率达99.5巴仙,比起2017年的99.4巴仙上升了;而普通(工艺)源流则有4千034名学生参加考试,而而其及格率达98.1巴仙,而努兰则是其中一名。 其中,近8成的学生成绩良好,可以升入中五行列参加O水准考试。而今年,普通工艺源流学生若在N水准会考英文和数学考获A,以及在另一科考获B或更佳成绩的学生也能转到普通学术源流班。 《今日报》描述,努兰在领取成绩时开心地向同学和老师展示,很难想象她为了这一张及格的成绩单付出比平常人还要努力的时光。 父母离异、母亲健康出问题 当你可能在这个年纪还在无忧无虑的过日子时,她就必须一肩扛起生活问题。小小年纪的她被父母的离婚、母亲的健康问题等生活与经济问题缠绕,导致她在小学二年级或三年级开始,就无法专注在学业上。 面对生活上的苦与难,小时候的她并不清楚该如何排解,只能试图透过割腕和自伤来排解痛苦,加上无法跟上上了中学后,自己无法跟上学习的脚步,经常出现逃课行为,甚至在一周内达三至四天都不去上课。 尽管当时出现令学校费解的行为,努兰却还是秉持着善良的心,她发现她的同学—16岁的Ivan Sombrado Chiang由于先天脊椎问题,脊椎发育不全,他必须从海军部队地铁站,独自坐着轮椅上学。短短的10分钟对他而言却相当不轻松。…