Civil rights activist and social worker Jolovan Wham took to Facebook on Sunday (21 March) to point out that he was invited as the guest of honour for The Substation’s SeptFest2021: The Migrant Workers Community Museum exhibition.

He said, “I didn’t have a PA or civil servant to prepare my speech, so I just rambled on in my usual seditious fashion”.

SeptFest 2021 is the celebration of Singapore art centre The Substation’s 30th anniversary, and is happening from 4 to 28 March. The month-long event sees a celebration of art, culture and community, with the theme “In the Margins”.

One of the events conducted at SeptFest2021 is the exhibition of The Migrant Workers Community Museum, which looks at the history of migration to Singapore and everything about the heritage of such a diverse group of people.

Local playwright Alfian Sa’at, who is one of the facilitators for this exhibition, said that he came up with the idea of creating this exhibition as he did not want to come up with just a performance.

“It was my way of honouring a certain ethos at the Substation—a place where I could try something new and not be questioned on whether I had the necessary credentials or experience.

“Nobody asked me, throughout the process, “do you know what you’re doing?” If anything, it was a question that I often asked myself. The answer came from that building on 45 Armenian Street, the reason it exists in the first place: “you learn by doing, and sometimes learn best by failing”, he said in a Facebook post on Sunday.

He added that this project gave him the chance to collaborate with amazing people, which include curator and visual artist Zul Zulkiflee as well as anthropologist Vithya Subramaniam.

Commenting on why he decided to focus an exhibition on migrant workers, Mr Alfian said: “To my shame, this was an underclass that—to me at least—was so marginal that it did not register immediately when I thought about marginality in Singapore. Their invisibility was extreme; despite numbering more than a million, they lived in dorms that were located far away from the locals’ housing heartlands. On the other hand, some of the domestic workers who lived among us were so effectively hidden that they might as well have lived in underground torture dungeons.”

He added that he made it a point from the beginning to involve migrant workers in the exhibition and credited them as curators of the museum.

If that’s not all, the playwright also said that the Information Media Development Authority (IMDA) said that the exhibition is rated “Advisory” with “Some Mature Content” as it has some socio-political references.

To this, Mr Alfian noted: “But of course migrant labour issues are socio-political issues! But why advise that these issues are unsuitable for the young? I suspect that it’s because the Museum doesn’t parrot certain official narratives—we don’t mention alcohol in the “Little India riots” nor do we cast aspersions on Parti Liyani’s testimony, for example.

“But I’ve long stopped taking these ratings as a trustworthy verdict on the age-appropriateness of a work—they are more an indication of IMDA’s increasingly irrelevant ratings regime,” he expressed.

At the end of his post, the playwright urged the public to pay the exhibition a visit, which runs from 18 March to 28 March at The Substation.

Edit: The article has been edited following amendments to Jolovan Wham’s Facebook post

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

64岁男子倒卧在兀兰组屋垃圾斜槽,已证实死亡

在兀兰组屋内6号通道第677座的垃圾斜槽附近发现一具男性尸体。 据《海峡时报》报道,尸体是昨日早晨由清洁工发现,当时他们正准备清理垃圾斜槽,该名男子被发现时已无法动弹,立即报警处理。 警方接获通报后与救护人员立即赶往现场,救护人员到场后也证实男子已无气息,而警方所得知该名男子64岁,目前案件已非自然死亡案件处理,仍在侦办中。 本地网媒Mothership随后向警方求证,表示男子并非倒卧在斜槽内,而是斜槽附近。  

指责律师拉维“专业行为失当” 总检察署投诉到律师公会!

因在访谈中指控方“太过狂热”(overzealous),本地律师拉维(M Ravi)接到副总检察长哈里古玛(Hri Kumar)来函,指责拉维对主控官作出严重指控,要求道歉。 不过,拉维在本月22日回函哈里古玛,并拒绝道歉,指后者要他道歉根本毫无根据,也指控方轻视囚犯葛毕(Gobi a/l Avedian)的性命。反之,拉维也采取进一步行动,代表多达11名死囚,提告总检察长和监狱总监。 随着拉维拒绝道歉和收回此前的言论,总检察署也将向律师公会投诉拉维,指责拉维的行为,未达到法庭辩护人和律师应有的专业行为标准。 拉维曾要求副总检察长哈里古玛,向死囚葛毕和家属作出公开道歉,但是也遭后者拒绝。 拉维则告知本社,总检察署此举“形同滥用程序”,而投诉到律师公会,也会启动纪律审裁庭聆讯。  

Releasing personal information in the public interest while withholding statistical data for the same reason?

In recent weeks, we’ve seen the government fall on two ends of…