FILE PHOTO: A woman holds a small bottle labeled with a “Vaccine COVID-19” sticker and a medical syringe in this illustration taken April 10, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

An ST Forumer by the name of Osman Mahmud Durrani was tested positive for COVID-19 on his return to Singapore on Jan 17.

Mr Durrani was not happy with how he was treated by the Singaporean authorities and wrote a letter to ST Forum to complain about his treatment here in Singapore. The letter was published on ST today (‘Forum: Quarantine period lengthened and I was asked to share a room‘, 4 Feb).

“My symptoms were minimal, and I was admitted to the National Centre for Infectious Diseases for two weeks of observation,” Mr Durrani explained.

On the 13th day, when he had almost completed his two-week quarantine, he was moved to D’Resort, a community isolation facility.

“My quarantine period had somehow been increased from 14 to 21 days without any explanation,” he complained.

“The World Health Organisation and Centres for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines require 10 to 14 days of quarantine, especially if there are no symptoms. If a longer quarantine was needed, there should have been clear communication. Why am I still in quarantine wasting government resources?”

Then on reaching D’Resort, he said he was told to share a room with another person. “I was shocked to be asked to share a room, considering I had not tested negative and was being paired with another patient,” he said.

“The D’Resort team said that room-sharing was the Ministry of Health’s (MOH) decision, but when I contacted MOH, it said it was a D’Resort policy.”

Mr Durrani further added that he suffers from various medical conditions and as such, he cannot share a room with other people. He said, “I have anxiety and suffer from blood pressure and other medical conditions. Finally, when I produced a medical letter and had a discussion with the medical team at the resort, it was confirmed that I did not need to share a room.”

He also complained that sharing a room with strangers causes “mental stress”.

“I am appalled at how this situation was managed. If cost is a consideration, then why not ask the person to pay for the room, rather than force complete strangers to share a room, which causes mental stress,” he said.

“I hope my predicament will be noted and the matter raised with MOH to avoid pain for those affected in future.”

Quarantined after close contact tests positive after two negative tests and 14-days SHN

Mr Duraini isn’t the only one who has experience the sudden increase in quarantine durations. Lawyer Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss recalled in a Facebook on Thursday (4 February) how she was informed on 3 February that she has come in close contact with a COVID-19 positive case two days prior and would therefore need to be quarantined.

“I was incredulous because the case had cleared two Covid-19 tests, on 4 Jan and again on 17 Jan,” Ms Chong-Aruldoss wrote, adding that the case tested positive for the virus two weeks after completing her Stay Home Notice (SHN) on 20 January.

Upset about having to quarantine, Ms Chong-Aruldoss said she was given a “small respite” when the MOH officer informed her that her 14 days quarantine period would be back dated to the date of exposure on 1 February, meaning that she would complete her quarantine on 15 February.

“I had no time to mentally and actually prepare for the days of isolation ahead,” she recounted, explaining that she was taken to the designated hotel that very evening to serve out the quarantine.

After a sleepless first night, Ms Chong-Aruldoss said, “I resolved to regain my composure and to make plans to complete the journey purposefully.”

Unfortunately, there was more bad news when the MOH officer told her that her quarantine would be extended by another seven days.

“As the case had tested positive after two negative tests and SHN, they were not sure what they were dealing with,” she wrote.

“Hence, a longer quarantine period was mandated for her close contacts. My last day was extended to 22 Feb.”

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens chide authorities for taking actions to deal with speeding only after Tanjong Pagar fatal car crash

Following the tragic accident that saw five people killed in the early…

读者投书《海时》申诉 樟宜医院MRI收费贵过私人诊所

上周五(20日),有民众在《海峡时报论坛》投书抱怨,自己在樟宜综合医院光是照个核磁共振成像(MRI),价格就比起私人诊所的收费更高,差距两倍以上。 这位译名为林川宝的读者自称经常出现肩膀疼痛,因此他在16日到樟宜综合医院骨科接受检查。医生则怀疑他患有严重的肩旋转肌撕裂(rotator cuff tear),便提议要做MRI检查。 为了能够治疗肩膀疼痛,早前他也在樟宜医院预约3月下旬才做检查,收费为1千450元。 但肩膀严重疼痛,甚至开始出现失眠状态,他决定先到私人诊所进行MRI检查,却发现含税竟仅需600元。 对收费差距感困惑 “对于樟宜综合医院和私人诊所的收费感到相当困惑。到底樟宜医院开出更高价格的理由何在?” 除了MRI以外,他也敦促樟宜医院和卫生部检讨其他医疗或服务费用是否也有收费过高的问题。 这已不是首次传出综合医院收费比私人诊所更高,本社报道,日前有消息指出,国立健保集团(National Healthcare Group…

Migrating Singaporeans – help improve employment opportunities first

S’poreans need to work less and play more. Gilbert Goh.

总理提控时评人梁实轩诽谤 下月初公开法庭聆审

只因分享一则脸书贴文,本地知名时评人、金融服务专业协会前主席梁实轩在2018年11月被总理提告诽谤。有关诉讼将在下月初在公堂(Openg  Court),由法官Aedit Abdullah聆审。 梁实轩代表律师林鼎,在昨日于脸书更新诉讼进展,指聆审将落在7月6日至10日之间,且公开于民众旁听。 据林鼎回答网民留言表示,预料总理也将出席该聆审。 梁实轩是在2018年11月初,分享了誌期11月5日的State Times Review(STR)文章,标题为《李显龙成为一马公司弊案主要调查对象》。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 据了解,资讯与媒体发展局(IMDA)隔日致函梁实轩,指其文章违反网络行为准则,要求后者在六小时内撤下有关文章。梁实轩也遵守IMDA的要求。 11月12日,德尊(新加坡)法律事务所致函梁实轩,要求他对总理李显龙公开道歉,并赔偿后者名誉损失。 梁实轩也在去年12月底反诉总理滥用法庭程序,并向总理索讨“名誉损害”的赔偿。…