In the light of grievances being aired relating to Singapore government apps—namely the technical issues with the TraceTogether app as well as the government’s revelation that the data from the app is accessible to the police despite earlier assurances that the data will only be used for contract tracing purposes—something peculiar and somewhat disturbing was highlighted in a reddit/r/Singapore thread.

Specifically, that many people have been forced to leave positive reviews on government apps in order to boost the app ratings on both the Appstore and Google Playstore.

A couple of people who were full-time National Servicemen (NSFs) noted that they were forced to download the TraceTogether app or sign up for extra duty shifts, or even be charged for insubordination.

This prompted several other reddit users to share about how they were forced to download the government’s anti-terrorism app, SGSecure and leave a positive review, while they were serving their national service. They, too, were faced with the same threat of signing up for extra shifts if they did not download the app.

One person even said that they could be “literally charged for Disobedience of General Orders” for not downloading the app.

This extends to apps, as another person said they were asked to ‘like’ Facebook pages that were associated to the Ministry of Defence and to leave positive reviews for the NS cookhouse.

Sifting through the thousands of reviews of the SGSecure app on both the Apple Appstore and Google Playstore revealed two things.

First, many 5-star reviews that were hyperbolic in describing the effectiveness of the SGSecure app. It is arguably one of the best displays of Singapore’s unique brand of humour on the internet.

On a more serious note, there were also many 1-star as well as 5-star reviews in which people stressed that they had only downloaded the app because they were forced to while they were serving national service.

The SGSecure app was released back in 2016 as part of a slew of measures for the SGSecure national movement which is aimed at uniting people in the face of terror threats as well as providing training on how to prevent and respond to such attacks.

Reviews from back in 2016 were mostly about malware and viruses which were infecting devices due to the app.

After that, though, the reviews were full of people complaining that they were forced to download the app, as well as the sarcastic ones about how the app saved them from a runway train and such.

It is not a leap to imagine that the government had NSFs download the app and leave positive reviews in order to boost the app’s credibility and justify the need for the app in the first place.

As for the TraceTogether app, we couldn’t find any reviews about people being forced by the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) or the Singapore Police Force (SPF) to download the app or leave positive reviews.

What we did find were reviews about how people were upset that they had to download the app due to a government mandate, yet the app is still plagued by battery drainage and bluetooth issues.

Many people feel like they are forced to download the app as the Smart Nation and Digital Government Office (SNDGO) announced back in 20 October 2020 that TraceTogether-only SafeEntry will be progressively implemented at popular venues by the end of 2020 such as workplaces, schools, malls, food and beverage outlets and hotels across Singapore.

The TT reviews are also filled with comments about privacy concerns and the government’s u-turn on how the data would be utilised.

TraceTogether has a 2.4 stars rating on the Appstore. While on the Playstore it’s roughly the same at 2.5 stars. The TraceTogether app, however, has been downloaded over 1 million times on Android.

According to the Singapore Government Developer Portal, the app has been downloaded over 4.2 million times by Singapore residents as of 6 January 2021.

TraceTogether app rating for iOS (left) and Android

As for the SGSecure app, it is rated 2.5 stars out of 5 on the Apple Appstore. While on the Google Playstore, it’s rated 4.5. Though we note that a majority of the 5-star reviews on Google were the sarcastic ones, which has inflated the app’s rating.

The all has also been downloaded over 100,00 times on Android. The numbers are likely higher for iOS, based on the TT download ratios.

It is also clear that the Government still pushing hard for more people to download SGSecure by all the advertising and publicising it has done.

SGSecure app rating for iOS (left) and Android

TOC has reached out the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) and the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) for comments.


Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

At least 21 SGX-listed companies closed factories in M’sia in observance of restricted movement order

Complying with Malaysia’s restricted movement order, at least 21 firms listed on…

Don't Be Swayed So Easily Singapore!

~By John Chan Chi Yung~ The PM and the rest of the…

部长称部分小贩诉求乃“情绪化流言” 小贩撰文表达失望

国会于今日复会,小贩中心议题再次成为话题,10多名议员、非选区议员和官委议员参与提问和辩论,至少21项提问,要求环境及水源部长解释有关社企小贩中心的经营模式,或其他与小贩中心有关的课题。 环境及水源部高级政务部长许连碹博士在国会上澄清,社企小贩中心的摊位租金中位数,在每月2000元左右,与现有小贩中心的1700元相近。 此外,社企小贩中心的杂费、清理桌子的费用也与现有小贩中心的收费相近,有些甚至更低。 许连碹在答复中表示,社企小贩中心的摊位租金中位数约每月2000元,并非一些媒体所报道的每月4000元。她说,现有小贩中心的摊位租金中位数是1700元,价位相近;不过在摊位面积方面,社企小贩中心的摊位介于10到21平方米,相比之下,现有小贩中心的摊位只有5到13平方米。 在实际摊位租金方面,社企小贩摊位每月的租金介于750元到3700元之间。这也与现有小贩中心无津贴摊位所需支付的每月640元到3900元类似。 早前,她认为关于社企小贩议题,有一部分是受“情绪化的道听途说所驱动,或许是出于善意,不过有些被误导和未经证实。” 高级部长或许认为,这些小贩的个人经历并不真实,只是企图在煽风点火。 另一方面,环境及水源部长马善高在国会也附和许连碹,指社企小贩中心模式“整体上是健全的,食物价格维持在可负担水平,为顾客提供各式高质量的食物选择,价格一般比邻近的咖啡店和食阁便宜。大部分的摊贩的生意也不错,不能让这些成就功亏一篑。” 他声称政府会“继续采用和改进社企小贩中心的模式,更好地满足公众的需求,并照顾摊贩的福利。” 如今,小贩林家良对于许连碹的说辞,直言“失望已无法盖过他沉重的情绪”。 “我们不是笨蛋,也不会对我们的同业的遭遇视而不见。我们肯定不会散播假新闻(如果您如此认为的话)。我们给足了即便在法律严格审查下也能站得住脚的的书面证据和资料。” 而小贩们的诉求,也成功促使环境局在短短两周内重新审视、并推翻了那些不利小贩营生的条款。没有来自民间的诉求和挑战,威权恐怕不会让步。…

Think Centre's Labour Day Message

~ By Think Centre ~ This Labour Day, Think Centre salutes all…