The Singapore Manufacturing Federation (SMF) said on Thursday (7 January) that a less hostile mediation approach would be more appropriate to address workplace discrimination, rather than taking legislative approach.

SMF’s statement was made in response to the letter by the Association of Women for Action and Research’s (AWARE) senior executive Mamta Melwani, who called for the Government to enact a Workplace Equality Act to deter workplace discrimination cases in Singapore.

According to AWARE, such law is also needed to ensure a legal remedy for dismissed workers and current employees, and hold employers legally accountable for their actions.

Ms Melwani stated that many workplace discrimination cases have gone unreported as employees chose not to file complaints against their employers due to a lack of protections under “the present non-legislative approach”.

“They fear Tafep [Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices] will not keep their complaint confidential and their employers will retaliate when the complaint comes to light,” she wrote.

However, Singapore National Employers Federation’s (SNEF) executive director Sim Gim Guan said that taking a legalistic approach to resolving workplace issues will only lead to “rigidities” and “souring of workplace relations”, which would not benefits the employer nor the employee.

“Legislation is also unlikely to change the mindsets of employees who choose not to report workplace discrimination for fear of retaliation or being identified,” said Mr Sim.

“Instead, responsible employers would handle such cases seriously and tactfully to ensure a harmonious work environment,” he added.

SMF in its statement penned by its Secretary-General Lawrence Pek, wrote, “With all due respect, we at SMF humbly request that Ms Melwani considers that as trends are on the downside and that a framework already exists, to stand with both SNEF and SMF, to further bolster and promulgate the work of Tafep,”

Mr Pek highlighted that Tafep’s report indicated that the number of complaints related to workplace discrimination has decreased over a five-year period from 2015.

“Even though both Ms Melwani and Mr Sim have given interesting statistics in relation to workplace discrimination, statistics provided over a five-year period are perhaps more coherent and persuasive relative to statistics done on a comparative year-to-year basis, especially since the year that just passed is one out of the ordinary,” he wrote.

Though Mr Pek noted that SMF is not against such legislation being enacted, he believes that legislative fiats are “not the silver bullets against rooting out opportunistic behaviours and not pervasive in every workplace”.

“While SMF acknowledges that Tafep is not without teeth, as it works closely with the Ministry of Manpower to take deterrent actions for egregious employers, SMF opines that any meaningful and sustainable complaisance still requires all stakeholders to ingest the positive spirit of any employment relationship, rather than be compelled to do so by prescriptive legislation,” he added.

Mr Pek also cited Manpower Minister Josephine Teo’s response in Parliament last September, who noted that implementing legislative protection for workers is “not unthinkable” for a Minister and thus the Retirement and Re-employment Act was enacted to protect senior workers.

“SMF believes that flexibility afforded in avenues such as mediation, especially in any labour dispute, is certainly a less hostile and less confrontational format.

“This is where parties can come together to resolve their differences, with cool heads and calm hearts among themselves, juxtaposed against the relative rigidity of a legislative framework that may end up being a protracted and painful process for both complainant and alleged offender,” he asserted.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lawyer who handled ‘Hong Kong 12’ case loses legal licence

A human rights lawyer who handled the case of Hong Kong pro-democracy…

WP Png asks for number of foreign student defaulters but scholar Ong replies with percentage

On Monday (5 Aug), Workers’ Party MP for Hougang SMC, Png Eng…

《海时》前总编:支持未审先扣维稳 港读者反问新加坡可有言论自由?

6月22日,《海峡时报》前总编冯元良在《南华时报》发表评论,文中他提及,网上流传旅居台湾的维权人士鄞义林举着”今日新加坡、明日香港、后日台湾“的大字报,并表示不认同后者观点。 在评论中冯元良指出,接受集会者表达异议的权利,不过他的朋友对待类似”诽谤“新加坡的态度不太宽容,也反问鄞君大可调查下有多少香港人想来新加坡定居。 形容香港“街头暴力荒谬” 冯元良也形容,许多自97香港回归以来一直关注这个都会命运的”有想法的新加坡人“,都觉得香港近期的”街头暴力“非常荒谬,非理性已战胜了理性。 他认为,有外国和香港内部势力算计并分裂和激起香港的社会和政治动荡,令他们感到悲痛。但他作为新惧怕人只能祝福香港,无法对这场灾难做什么,只能困惑地看着先进的局势,并从中反思。 他也认为任何理智的人都不明白何以《逃犯条例》会引起争议,指该条例的修法用意是直接明了的,香港也必须对公民和国际社会履行责任,避免成为逃犯天堂。 “但是摆在眼前的事实无阻蓄意被散播的恐惧,宣扬”送中“修法将让北京当局有办法基于政治因素引渡特定人士。那些选择可以散播假消息的,理应扪心自问对香港社会造成的破坏。” “须有相应法律和力量预防公共安全威胁” 而他认为,香港街头暴力事件表明,政府必须有必要的法律和执法力量,“以及训练有素的人员来预防和消除对公共安全的威胁。” “总的来说,即便在许多领域亲自由派的人士,也会接受有必要针对煽动暴力和破坏公共安全,有预防性扣留的权力。” 他表示,香港的情况应该提醒大家,在特殊情况下,实施未审先扣以维护公共安全和社会凝聚力,并没有错。 读者回函反驳冯元良…

【冠状病毒19】8月18日 新增100例确诊病例,两例入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月18日中午12时,本地新增100例冠状病毒19确诊,入境病例两例,一例社区病例,是一名本地公民。 本地累计确诊已增至5万5938例。 新增病例大多是隔离中的宿舍客工,至于两例入境病例,再抵新后已遵守居家通知。