Proceedings in the Singapore Parliament will be live-streamed for the first time on Monday (4 January) at 1.30 pm.

The Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) in a statement today said that members of the public will be able to view the live-stream on the Ministry’s YouTube channel in both the original languages and English-translated versions.

Comments on the live-stream, however, are turned off.

Minister for Communications and Information S. Iswaran said legislative bodies in other countries have been live-streaming their proceedings, adding that such streaming has become commonplace worldwide in today’s world.

The Government would thus study how to implement live streaming to engage with Singaporeans, he said.

Previously, MPs such as the Workers’ Party’s Leon Perera and Nominated MP Anthea Ong have called for Parliament sittings to be live-streamed to the public.

Then-Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information Chee Hong Tat in 2017 said that the Government did not implement live-streaming of Parliament proceedings due to low demand.

Mr Iswaran today was quoted as saying that the possibility of MPs playing to the gallery instead of seriously debating national issues was among reasons that contributed to the Government’s reluctance in implementing Parliament live-streams in the past.

In September last year, Mr Iswaran said that the Government “agrees in principle” to live-stream parliamentary debates, adding that the Ministry will study the implementation details.

“Our aim, as always, will be to achieve transparency, accountability, and accessibility, while preserving the integrity and dignity of parliamentary proceedings,” he said in Parliament.

Mr Iswaran explained some of the access that has been provided to the public, noting that the public can attend the proceedings in the Strangers’ Gallery, clips which arranged by topic and speaker are being made available online, and a full transcript is recorded in the Hansard.

“We have been reluctant to go further, for both practical and policy reasons. Demand for such live broadcasts, even of major speeches, is generally low.

“Only 10 per cent of that are free to air television news, for example, and Parliament is a forum for serious debate on national issues. The debate in Parliament should be vigorous, but the tone should be sober,” he added.

Then-Leader of the House Grace Fu said that live Parliamentary broadcasts risk turning the House into a “form of theatre”.

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Fiery confrontation at Hong Lim Park over use of speaker's corner

A heated dispute between a National Parks officer and organiser of the…

Virus-hit cruise ship in lock down, off Japan’s Yokohama harbour

Yesterday, Japan’s Health Minister, Katsunobu Kato, disclosed another 41 people on board…

Around one-third of govt contracts for legal services awarded to small and medium-sized firms over the past five years: DPM Heng

Around one-third of government contracts for the provision of legal services were…

民主党上诉要人力部长撤更正指示 维持内堂审理

此前,人力部长援引《防假消息法》对民主党三则文章和网络贴文发出更正指示。民主党要求撤回遭拒绝,于是上诉高庭。民主党争取上诉在公堂(open court)审理。 不过高庭发言人告知本地媒体,在明日(16日)进行的审讯仍维持在内堂审理,意味着不会开放给公众聆听。 根据《防假消息法》的上诉程序规则,若不满要求撤销指示的申请被部长驳回,当事者可透过提呈原诉传票(originating summons)和书面证词(supporting affidavit),上诉高庭。 高庭认为所有原诉传票申诉,都安排在内堂审理,而不是在公堂。 民主党在此前的文告指出,此案涉及公共利益,且《防假消息法》也广受在野党和公民社会的诟病,更何况外籍PMET课题亦牵动国人神经。 故此,该党认为有鉴于上述课题可能成为来届选举的热门议题,希望上诉能在公堂审理,让群众亦有机会旁听。 去年12月14日,人力部援引《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》(POFMA),向民主党发布的三则贴文和文章发出更正指示。 本月6日,人力部表示“经过谨慎考量”,,认为民主党的申请没有充分理据,故此拒绝撤回指示。不过并未详细解释,民主党的申请为何理据不足。 民主党也不甘示弱回应,人力部也无法为他们的决定提出理据,并指该党提出申请时,已列出详细理由,包括人力部数据分析和该党贴文的对比。