• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
  • Volunteer
    • Internship with The Online Citizen
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
  • zh-hans 简体中文
  • en English
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Defamation trial: LKY’s lawyer Kwa Kim Li’s handwritten notes reveal PM Lee Hsien Loong “has free rein”, “can handle Cabinet”

by The Online Citizen
30/12/2020
in Court Cases, Media
Reading Time: 6min read
62

Prime Minister “Lee Hsien Loong has free rein” and “He can handle Cabinet” were among the words handwritten by the late Lee Kuan Yew’s lawyer Kwa Kim Li in her email correspondence with the Lee patriarch.

This was revealed in court on the fourth day of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s defamation suit trial against TOC chief editor Terry Xu on Thursday (3 December).

Ms Kwa, the niece of the late Mr LKY’s wife Kwa Geok Choo, was the lawyer tasked with drafting Mr LKY’s will and had admitted being part of drafting six of the seven wills from 2011 to 2012.

In his examination of Ms Kwa this afternoon, Mr Xu’s lawyer Lim Tean referenced an email sent by Ms Kwa to Mr LKY on 2 October 2012.

Mr Lim asked Ms Kwa if the handwritten notes were penned by Ms Kwa herself, to which she confirmed that she did.

“And you see the first of the handwritten words there, “Lee Hsien Loong has free rein”. Is that a reference to Lee Hsien Loong?” Mr Lim questioned.

“Yes. Yes,” Ms Kwa replied.

“And the words, “He can handle Cabinet”, is that also a reference to Lee Hsien Loong?” Mr Lim further probed.

“The answer would be privileged,” Ms Kwa responded.

Justice Audrey Lim, however, disagreed with Ms Kwa, stating that “this is what is written”.

She then sought clarification from Ms Kwa as to who “he” in the “He can handle Cabinet” referred to.

“He would be Lee Hsien Loong,” said Ms Kwa.

Kwa Kim Li searched for document on whether 38 Oxley Road was gazetted at least twice

Citing an email from Mr LKY to her and Dr LWL with the subject “Osley” (sic), dated 6 September 2012, Mr Lim asked Ms Kwa if she had received the email.

“Yes,” Ms Kwa replied.

“And are the handwritten notes in this email yours?” Mr Lim further probed.

“Yes,” Ms Kwa responded.

Mr Lim then asked Ms Kwa to read the handwritten words, following which the latter read out: “I can’t find gazette. Told him.”

When Mr Lim proceeded to ask her when she had searched for any indication or information on the gazetting of 38 Oxley Road, Ms Kwa replied: “It would be around this time in September 2012.”

Mr Lim then asked Ms Kwa if she had searched for the gazette after receiving the aforementioned email.

Ms Kwa replied that she could not remember “whether it was before or it was after”.

“Right. So you can’t remember whether you searched for the gazette before or after this email?” Mr Lim questioned.

“Yes,” Ms Kwa replied.

When asked by Mr Lim as to how many times she had conducted a search on whether 38 Oxley Road was gazetted and when she had carried out the searches, Ms Kwa replied that she had done so on at least two occasions.

“The first time I searched was around the time of this email. I had asked my librarian to check for me,” she said, referencing 6 September 2012.

“And the second time I checked or rather I searched it was perhaps a few days after. I have asked one of my colleagues one of the lawyers to check for me,” Ms Kwa testified.

Mr Lim then asked her: “So to the best of your knowledge, can you tell us again how many times did you search for the gazette?”

“I can’t exactly remember, but it would be twice … At least twice,” she said.

Mr Lim then asked her she had notified Mr LKY “on all the occasions” after conducting her searches, to which Ms Kwa replied that the matter would be privileged information.

While agreeing that the matter would be privileged if it was part of Ms Kwa’s solicitor-client relationship with Mr LKY, Justice Lim queried Ms Kwa as to who the “him” in “I can’t find gazette. Told him” referred to.

Ms Kwa then confirmed that it referred to Mr LKY.

Mr Lim later cited an email sent by Mr LKY to Ms Kwa on 16 October 2012.

When asked as to whether she had received the email from Mr LKY, Ms Kwa said that she did.

She also confirmed that the handwritten notes in the email were hers when asked by Mr Lim.

Referencing Ms Kwa’s last handwritten sentence in the email, which read “I can’t find Oxley gazette”, Mr Lim asked Ms Kwa if she had — around the time she wrote an email to Mr LKY on 16 October 2012 — checked on whether 38 Oxley Road had been gazetted.

“I can’t remember,” Ms Kwa replied.

Justice Lim then interjected: “Yes, but just to clarify, “I can’t find Oxley gazette” means you can’t find a gazette — sorry, you can’t find a document that shows Oxley the house had been gazetted?”

“That is correct,” said Ms Kwa.

When asked again by Mr Lim if she made another search on whether 38 Oxley Road was gazetted around 16 October 2012, Ms Kwa reiterated that she could not remember.

Handwritten notes on 17 August 2011 email included certain words and language “subsequently inserted into” Mr LKY’s will

Mr Lim earlier questioned Ms Kwa if she had drafted the six wills of Mr LKY between 20 August 2011 and 2 November 2012, to which she answered yes.

He then asked her if all but last two of the six wills contained the demolition clause for the 38 Oxley Road property, to which she replied in the affirmative.

When questioned by Mr Lim on whether the handwritten notes in an email sent from Mr LHY’s wife Lee Suet Fern to Mr LKY were penned by Ms Kwa, Ms Kwa confirmed that it is true.

The email, dated 17 August 2011, was copied to Mr LHY and Dr LWL.

Mr Lim then asked Ms Kwa if her handwritten notes in the email had included “certain words and language” which were “subsequently inserted into” Mr LKY’s will, dated 20 August 2011.

Ms Kwa responded that she did.

Kwa Kim Li forwarded documents to all three Lee siblings with a letter

Ms Kwa also disclosed during Mr Lim’s examination of her evidence that she had sent documents alongside a letter to PM Lee, Mr LHY and Dr LWL “as the only beneficiaries” of Mr LKY’s estate on 4 June 2015.

In the letter, Ms Kwa wrote that PM Lee had requested “file records” Mr LKY’s previous wills “for notes, emails, whatever information on Lee Kuan Yew’s instructions to you regarding Oxley”.

Ms Kwa also confirmed that she had sent a letter to the three Lee siblings on the subject matter of the estate of Lee Kuan Yew on 22 June 2015.

Mr Lim then asked her if she did attach the three categories of documents set out at the bottom of her letter, namely:

  • The draft will of 19 August 2011 with cover email;
  • The email trail of 16 December 2013 from Mrs Lee Suet Fern; and
  • The email trail of 3 January 2014 from Lin Ho, Mr LKY’s private secretary.

Ms Kwa confirmed that she did.

“And can I just ask you to confirm that when you mentioned Fern, it is a reference to Lee Suet Fern?” Mr Lim questioned.

“Yes,” Ms Kwa replied.

Ms Kwa, a senior partner at Lee&Lee, previously told The Straits Times that she did not prepare Mr LKY’s last will.

Dr LWL, however, alleged that Ms Kwa had “extensively” discussed changes Mr LKY wanted to make to his will before he signed the December 2013 will — the seventh and final will.

Mr LHY similarly previously claimed that the will was “drafted by Kwa Kim Li of Lee&Lee”.

Both PM Lee’s and Mr Xu’s sides are expected to send written submissions to the court in January.

Correction (4 Dec): When Justice Lim queried Ms Kwa as to who the “him” in “I can’t find gazette. Told him” referred to, Ms Kwa had said it referred to Mr LKY, not PM Lee as previously stated. We apologise for the error.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Tags: 38 Oxley Road defamation suit
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
62 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Recent Posts

  • Vietnam reports first virus outbreak in nearly two months
  • Epic battle over GameStop as ‘nerds’ take on Wall Street
  • MHA owes the public an explanation as to why it chose to flout the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child
  • RDU expresses grave concerns over three individuals arrested for peaceful protest against anti-LGBT discrimination outside MOE building
  • WHO team to start Wuhan virus probe under global glare
  • MOH preliminarily confirms 34 new cases of COVID-19 infection; Total tally at 59,425

Trending posts

Vietnam reports first virus outbreak in nearly two months

Public member complains prices at FairPrice too high and questions its mission to serve working-class SGs

Sheng Siong being compared to NTUC FairPrice after rewarding staff with up to 16 month’s bonuses

Netizens call for “full transparency” by MOH after reports of adverse events from Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination recorded in S’pore

Chan Chun Sing says not meaningful to track growth of Singaporean core in companies

Students petition MOE to stop using device management application on students’ laptops due to privacy and security concerns

Load More
December 2020
MTWTFSS
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
« Nov   Jan »
  • About Us
  • Volunteer
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz
62
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply