Connect with us

Investigations & Inquiries

Ex-EAI staff alleges collusion between former NUS East Asian Institute director and his successor to silence her sexual harassment complaint

Published

on

Following the decision of a victim of a former director of the National University of Singapore (NUS)’s East Asian Institute (EAI)’s sexual harassment to break her silence on the circumstances surrounding her case, another individual has chosen to speak up on her ordeal.

The victim, a former EAI staff member who identified herself as Tseng, said in a statement sent to TOC on Friday (27 November) that both the university and EAI management had “systematically failed” her complaint against Professor Zheng Yongnian’s sexual harassment and power abuse.

She said that she was prevented by EAI from going back to her office and was “subsequently fired without explanation as a revenge” as a result of her complaint to the university and her police report.

In a media report detailing Prof Zheng’s denial of the sexual harassment allegations against him, the former EAI director accused Dr Tseng of sexual harassment against male colleagues and sending “pornographic emails” to him.

Prof Zheng also claimed that Dr Tseng was “warned” and prohibited by the EAI’s current director Bart Hofman from coming to the office after she was accused of harassing a fellow female researcher from Taiwan.

The new EAI director, according to Prof Zheng, had reportedly told Dr Tseng to “work at home instead of coming to the office”.

“After her contract expired, the East Asia Institute ended her contract with the East Asia Institute,” Prof Zheng added.

Dr Tseng in her statement on Friday, however, pointed out that the recent findings by the COI on the allegations against Prof Zheng highlighted that Prof Zheng was forbidden to contact any EAI staff after he was found to have harassed Charlotte — a previous victim who sent a statement to TOC.

“In this context, how could it be possible for Zheng to know the details that Hofman knew and used to evict me?” Dr Tseng questioned.

She further prompted: “Why did Hofman inform Zheng about my eviction from EAI, in a manner covering such comprehensive details?”

“Zheng had known about the context and detail of my eviction, more than myself!” Dr Tseng said.

Dr Tseng posited that it is evident that Prof Hofman “has been working under Zheng’s instructions” by preventing her from going to the office while clearly acknowledging her complaint.

Prof Hofman, she alleged, had “picked a false allegation” to evict her from the office to help Prof Zheng get rid of her complaint — yet, she said, the former did not even disclose the details of the accusation made against her.

Further, she was notified by NUS Deputy President Cheng Tsuhan on 31 August that the EAI had approved her supposed application to work from home “since 20 March 2020” to “avoid further straining their relationships”, and not because of safe distancing requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Source: Tseng, via email

Similar to Ms Charlotte’s case, Dr Tseng alleged that Prof Zheng had utilised fabricated stories and disinformation to mislead people regarding her situation, which have spread to the public in the form of “voluminous online posts” carrying “unfounded allegations” against her.

“Sexual harassment, defamation and slander are all tactics employed by Zheng during his EAI Directorship to serve his personal interests, which had been prioritised to EAI interests,” Dr Tseng added.

Those who did not have shared interests with Prof Zheng and “did not follow his orders that fell beyond our EAI duty”, she said, “would be bullied by defamation and slandering language, in both professional fields and personal characters”.

“For past months, these reproachful languages are causing serious mental damages (sic) on me, as I feel I have been haunted by these humiliating words all the time,” she lamented.

Dr Tseng said that she has “no doubt” that the EAI had denied victims’ requests to investigate Prof Zheng’s alleged concerted defamation efforts against victims of his sexual harassment.

“How could one beg Mr Hofman to investigate his cohort?” She said.

Prof Zheng “continuously made up and circulated defamatory posts to discredit, attack and humiliate” with help of “close aides, overseas media partners and business partners”: EAI staff member Charlotte

Previously on Monday, current EAI staff member Ms Charlotte said in a statement sent to TOC that while she appreciates the efforts of the Singapore Police Force and NUS in investigating her complaint against Professor Zheng Yongnian, she was forced to deal with “deep disappointment, agony and even the pressure from many sides” to remain silent.

Ms Charlotte alleged that from the start of the police investigations last year, Prof Zheng had “continuously made up and circulated defamatory posts to discredit, attack and humiliate” her with the “help of his close aides, overseas media partners and business partners”.

“Among them are not only distorted facts and slanders from someone claimed as EAI colleagues and insiders, but even my archival information and photos in EAI were leaked out and exposed online,” she said.

Source: Charlotte, via email

Ms Charlotte said that despite repeated complaints to EAI and requests for “investigations and clarifications” on how Prof Zheng was able to obtain such archival information, the institute’s current management had rejected her requests and told her that it has “nothing to do with EAI management”.

Ms Charlotte added that even Prof Zheng himself had engaged in the distortion of facts, including by alleging that she had approached him “by asking to meet his daughter” and that she had “joined his family gathering”.

She clarified that it was Prof Zheng who had invited her to travel with him with the “excuse of his daughter’s visit to Singapore”.

Ms Charlotte added that she has never even visited his house.

Source: Charlotte, via email

Ms Charlotte alleged that Professor Zheng and his allies have been able to “distort facts and misguide public opinion” by cooperating with media partners as illustrated above.

“In fact, during the whole process, I also felt an invisible force covering up the predator and continuously persecute (sic) victims to keep silent, thus indulging the predator to be more emboldening (sic) and ruthless,” she added.

While the entire ordeal of being silenced has left her traumatised, Ms Charlotte said that she has “never regretted” making a police report against Prof Zheng.

She strongly believes that harassers can only be punished for their misconduct “when the victims of sexual harassment speak out bravely”.

Ms Charlotte highlighted that she has reported the aforementioned “cyberbullying to the police and will take necessary legal actions after consulting legal opinions”.

NUS in a statement last Tuesday (17 November) said that it was made aware of allegations against Prof Zhang in May last year and subsequently suspended him.

This entailed him to stay off-campus and to carry out his work from home, pending police and university investigations at the time. He was also prohibited from contacting the subordinate in question as a result of a “No-Contact Order”.

Police then issued a stern warning to Prof Zheng in April this year for outrage of modesty in relation to the case at hand.

The COI appointed a month later determined that at least one of the staff member’s allegations had occurred, The Straits Times reported.

Prof Zheng had admitted to hugging the subordinate without her consent during a work meeting on 30 May 2018 in his office, according to the university.

The university said that it would have issued Prof Zheng a written warning following the COI’s findings. However, the university decided to record the outcome of its internal review in its staff records as Prof Zheng had left NUS.

According to ST, Prof Zheng is understood to have joined the Chinese University of Hong Kong in Shenzhen as the head of its Advanced Institute of Global and Contemporary China Studies.

Continue Reading
10 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

AFP

Swiss prosecutors say investigating UBS-Credit Suisse merger

Swiss prosecutors are investigating the UBS takeover of Credit Suisse, following pressure from authorities and media leaks. The probe aims to identify any criminal offences and ensure Switzerland’s financial centre remains “clean.”

The merger was arranged by the government to prevent a global financial meltdown after Credit Suisse’s share price collapsed due to a series of scandals.

The rescue merger is not only “the biggest transaction” since the 2008 financial crisis but also “the first time” two systemically important banks at the global level will merge.

Published

on

GENEVA, SWITZERLAND — Swiss federal prosecutors said Sunday that they had opened an inquiry into the UBS takeover of its embattled banking rival Credit Suisse, following pressure from federal authorities and media leaks.

In an email to AFP, prosecutors said they issued orders to investigate after “taking stock of the situation with all the relevant internal services” and contacting national and local authorities.

The probe will aim to ensure Switzerland’s financial centre remains “clean” and identify any criminal offences within their remit, they said.

A “surveillance system” has also been put in place that will allow prosecutors to intervene if necessary.

The prosecutors added that they wanted to “have an overall view of the many aspects” of the events relating to the near-collapse of Credit Suisse, including those reported in the media, and to “secure and assess the available information”.

“Different internal and external bodies have been mandated or contacted with the aim of clarifying and gathering information,” they added.

‘Any criminal offence’

Switzerland’s GDP relies heavily on the financial sector which employs tens of thousands of people in the alpine country.

On the weekend of March 18-19, the marriage of Switzerland’s two biggest banks was hastily arranged by the government to prevent a global financial meltdown, following fears of contagion from the collapse of three US regional banks.

Credit Suisse shares had tumbled and the second-largest bank in the country was in danger of failing, sparking fears of turmoil in markets and the financial sector worldwide.

Verbal assurances and a loan of 50 billion Swiss francs ($54.6 million) by the central bank days before the takeover were not enough to calm investor concerns.

Credit Suisse had been embroiled in a series of scandals before its share price collapsed, getting caught up in the bankruptcy of the British financial company Greensill and the implosion of the US hedge fund Archegos.

It was also embroiled in a bribery scandal in Mozambique involving loans to state-owned companies and was fined $2 million in a money laundering case linked to a Bulgarian cocaine network.

Massive risks

The scandals, a major restructuring plan that failed to convince all observers and a heavy loss in 2022 risked bankruptcy — and with it the reputation of Switzerland’s banking sector.

UBS, the country’s largest bank, agreed to absorb its troubled rival for $3.25 billion in an emergency deal supervised by the government, the Swiss central bank and the financial regulator.

Both UBS and Credit Suisse are among a select group of lenders deemed “too big to fail” due to their importance to the global banking system.

The federal state and the central bank also provided substantial financial guarantees in the event of the discovery of unpleasant surprises in the books of accounts, which UBS did not have time to examine in detail.

For UBS, which has just reappointed its former CEO Sergio Ermotti to lead this merger, the “number one priority is to stabilise the situation”.

The rescue merger is not only “the biggest transaction” since the 2008 financial crisis, it is also “the first time” that two systemically important banks at the global level will merge, said Colm Kelleher, chairman of the board of directors of UBS.

These risks and the extraordinary size of the new megabank are worrying political and economic circles in Switzerland, beyond the likelihood of thousands of job losses.

— AFP

Continue Reading

Investigations & Inquiries

Singapore-based company run by Indian national accused of involvement in UK scam still operating

Published

on

A British software engineer, who goes by the pseudonym Jim Browning, is well-known for actively hunting down scammers and fraudsters operating in call centers, mainly in India, for the past four years.

In a video posted in August 2019, Browning shows an example of a scam where a victim will receive an “emergency call from VISA secure” claiming that there were unauthorized transactions of 600 GBP from his account, which would prompt the victim to call the fake customer service.

According to Browning, these messages are designed to alarm potential victims and are a ruse to gain access to people’s bank accounts via remote access software.

Browning called the fake customer service, and a scammer told him that someone from “Manchester” had attempted to steal hiss money via “the help of internet line”.

Later, another woman calling from “network terminal department” requested Browning to log in to his bank account “to check if the scammers had added any payees to his bank account”.

Pretending to be hooked on the bait, Browning logged into his bank account, and the scammer tried to blackout his computer screen while she created a Transferwise account using the personal details Browning had provided.

At the 9:44 mark of his video posted in August 2019 , we can see that the scammer, who has access to his computer, attempted to transfer £7,999 to a bank account owned by a Singapore company, HLR Solutions Pte Ltd.

Browning believes that the company is complicit in the scam.

No money was lost that day because the details provided to the scammer were made up, and the scammer gave up after she could not process the transfer.

Live company and still operating

A search on the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) official website shows that HLR Solutions Pte Ltd was incorporated on December 23, 2016, with 100,000 shares capital, and is categorized under information technology consultancy (except cybersecurity).

The info also showed that an Indian national, Boya Lavanya is listed as the director of HLR Solutions Pte Ltd.

The company is located at United Square, Thomson Road, which is a virtual office and does not have a physical office listed anywhere.

Despite claiming to be a “leading service provider for servers and network devices wise hardware and software support,” no information about its consultancy service can be found online. HLR Solutions Pte Ltd’s website is not operating, and no posts have been made on their Facebook page.

The company also opened a company in Hyderabad, Telangana, India, in 2019, which is where the scamming company Acuta Technologies exposed by Jim Browning in the video, originated from.

Online data shows it is run by the same owner, Lavanya Boya, with another director named Harish Kumar Reddy Yallannagari.

Repeat attempts by The Online Citizen (TOC) in contacting the company at its email address were unable to get a response.

HLR Solutions Pte Ltd claims that they offer software consultancy, but how can customers find them without their website? Even if they do, how can they trust a company that operates via a virtual office to do business?

ACRA records show that it filed its annual return on 24 August 2022 which suggests that it is still alive and operating.

Furthermore, it appears that they are still actively recruiting employees. They recently posted two job ads on Jobstreet, hiring a senior wintel engineer and network/ infrastructure architect and engineer, although it is unclear whom they will hire.

Another job ad was posted on LinkedIn. The company is hiring a “senior system analyst” who has “any degree with 3 to 6 years of experience in the relevant field,” and “excellent communication skills, both written and verbal, especially in English, Hindi, and Telugu.”

However, the job scope in the description had nothing to do with tech services. The analyst is to “lead and develop team leaders or travel consultants in delivering travel agency operational services at agreed service levels consistent with company standards while optimizing performance.”

A search on LinkedIn showed that a “network engineer” named Rambabu Valishetti has been working for the company since November 2018, and he comes from the same university, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, as Mahesh Bandi, who is the Managing Director at Acuta technologies, the company that is responsible for the scam in Browning’s video.

Despite Browning’s allegations, HLR Solutions Pte Ltd is seemingly operating without any investigations by the Singapore authorities. TOC had earlier written to the Singapore Police Force regarding the company’s conduct and whether any police investigation had been carried out, but no response has been received so far.

When contacted, a UOB spokesperson said, “UOB has zero tolerance for scams.”

It is concerning that a company accused of being involved in a scam is still operating, actively recruiting staff, and apparently not being investigated by the authorities. This is especially so since India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and Singapore’s PayNow were linked on Tuesday, allowing faster and more cost-efficient cross-border remittances between the two countries.

Continue Reading

Trending