After announcing an online public discourse session as part of their Alumni Learning series, the Raffles Hall Association (RHA) appears to have quietly replaced its entire line up of speakers for the event.

The original announcement on the RHA Facebook page on 18 October showed that the two speakers for the event titled ‘Public Discourse: Truth & Trust’ were Professor Cherian George from Hong Jong Baptist University and Professor Donald Low from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. The event, scheduled for 1 November, sought to discuss the “integrity of media and freedom of public discourse, with specific reference to their new book PAP v PAP”.

Source: Liew Kai Khiun / Facebook

The book is an anthology that draws of both professors’ years of commentary on the government politics, as well as new essays in response to the events of 2020 thus far. PAP v PAP explores one aspect of the inner struggle of Singapore’s ruling People’s Action Party, that is the struggle “between a conservative attachment to what worked in the past, and a boldly progressive vision for the future.”

Both Prof George and Prof Low are vocal and well-known critics of the Singapore government and both have moved to Hong Kong to continue with their respective lecturing careers.

Strangely, just three days before the event, Founding President of the RHA, Mr Sonny Yuen, posted the same event with changes made to the line-up of speakers and a whole new poster.

This is despite the fact that the Facebook page for the event still features the old poster publicising a forum with Prof George and Prof Low as panelists.

According to Mr Yuen’s Facebook post on 27 October, the new speakers are former journalist Al Ramirez Dizon, RH Resident Fellow and Lecturer at National University of Singapore Shoba Avadhani, and Special Research Adviser at the Institute of Policy Studies Arun Mahizhnan.

Profs Cherian George and Donald Low appear to have been removed from the panel entirely.

Not only that, description of the topic for the discourse was also altered slightly. Mr Yuen wrote, “Join in the important conversations on the today’s (social) media world where we apparently can no longer trust what we read, see or hear.  We have a panel of distinguished and experienced experts in media and communications -_*Shobha Avadhani, Al Dizon and Arun Mahiznan*_ – to ask the important questions: where and what is the truth in public discourse; and what are the socio-political consequences if truth is compromised or constrained and trust is thus eroded.”

Beer distributor and former chocolatier, Lim Jialiang drew attention to this change in a Facebook post of his own on the same day, noting that he had spoken to Prof Low about this “bait and switch”.

“Since confirming the talk with Raffles Hall Association over a month ago, there hasn’t been any contact from the organisers at least on Donald’s side,” said Mr Lim, adding that the two original speakers have essentially be uninvited from the talk given the new event details which were announced.

He went on to raise several questions, including why the two professors were uninvited in the first place, especially given that their book has sold out its first print run and will surely spark plenty of debate and discussion.

Mr Lim went on to wonder who at NUS made the decision that led to this “bait and switch”, adding “I can’t think that it would be Raffles hall Association that made that decision, having been the ones that decided to invite the two in the first place.”

Next, he asked if the new panelist were even aware of the fact that they were replacing Prof George and Prof Low, and whether RHA would be coming out to confirm that they are indeed replacing their original slate of speakers.

In an update to the post, Mr Lim also included a screenshot of one of the new speakers, Mr Arun, saying in a Facebook comment that he would be pulling out of the event.

In his comment, Mr Arun said, “I wish to let everyone know that the organiser of this forum did not give me a full briefing of what has transpired earlier. I wasn’t even aware that the previous arrangement had be publicised. Cherian gave me a fuller briefing today. I have withdrawn from the forum.”

TOC has reached out to Prof George, Prof Low and Mr Yuen for a response, but have yet to receive a response.

Update on 28.10.2020 at 3pm:

Responding to queries from TOC, Prof George said today (28 October) that he received a call from the organisers last Friday informing him that they were told to cancel the event.

“As they only called me, I asked them to write to Donald as well. We were waiting for their email confirming the cancelation, but that was the last we heard from them. We were left to piece two and two together based on what we saw on social media, so we are unable to shed any more light on the matter,” said the professor of media studies in an email.

He added, “We hope people who signed up for our talk do not think we stood them up. Academia runs on collegiality, not just money or facilities, so we treat such invitations respectfully, even those from student and alumni groups.”

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

电动滑板车禁令影响生计 约30名快递员集体申诉

电动滑板车禁令于周一颁布后,直接打击到我国将近7000名外卖快递员的生计,约30名快递员到宏茂桥3到的人民行动党支部,希望能够在李显龙总理与民会面的地点,向总理当面申诉有关禁令所带来的不便,希望能够获得解决方案。 这群快递员于昨日(11月6日)晚上8时,到宏茂桥3到第322座组屋集合请愿。其实这并非他们首次做出申诉,这周以来,他们及其他同行都向部长申诉,希望能够看到一线生机。 据悉,虽然快递员们似乎有些愤怒,但是现场秩序良好。 现场负责接见选民的义工们将快递员的申诉记录后,建议他们进行联名请愿,让政府了解受影响的人数和情况等。 有快递员申诉道,他们选择当快递员实属不得已,但是面对政府在过去陆续颁布的指示行事,包括要求符合UL2272防火标准、行驶速度、重量等,他们都一一遵循了。但是,现如今却要禁止在人行道上行驶,简直加剧了他们的困境。 “现在所有人都因为电板车使用者撞死人,就要求禁用,但矛头应该针对肇事者才对,不要打翻我们的饭碗。” 蓝彬明尚穆根会见快递员 除了当局,其他的部长也接见了快递员的申诉,其中包括内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根,以及交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生。 蓝彬明指出,他曾向申诉者解释实施有关措施的考量,并且给出一些建议,如改用其他工具等。“我尝试了解他们家庭所受到的影响,若有必要,福利委员会也能提供援助。” 尚穆根也在其脸书上帖文指出,他约30名骑电板车的快递员会面。他起初遇见三人,随后就要求和其他的人见面,因此大家都来了。“当时我们在空旷的地区会面,所以我请他们靠近一些,方便我们互相聆听。” 他指出,会面现场一切顺利,他解释了自己的离场后,快递员们也分享了各自立场和困境。尚穆根表示,他也承诺会将快递员们的反映和观点,转达给交通部和内阁,此举令快递员们非常感激。 他也指出,将会针对此事再次召开会议。…

许连碹:安装摄像逮垃圾虫 高空抛物情况受控制

2016年至2018年间有超过7700起高空抛物的投诉,惟基于每年有约2300至2800起高空抛物的投诉,因此这个数字仍属 “正常” ,而当局的 “成功破案率” 在随着监控摄像头的增加后,有明显提升。 环境及水源部高级政务部长许连碹昨日(9月3日)在国会中指出,高空抛物情况在经过当局努力提醒民众后有所改善。 而国家环境局在2012年装置监控摄像机后,在逮捕知法犯法的嫌犯上有着显着的提升。“2012年8月至2018年12月期间,共有逾2200名高空抛物罪犯被逮捕,其中52人是重犯。” 她指出,为了防止高空抛物,当局摄下严厉的处罚措施,首次违例者将被罚款2000元,重犯者将被罚款不超过一万元,或垃圾虫劳改(CWO),或两者兼施。 许连碹指出,当局去年共发出2600张垃圾虫劳改通知。 上个月在丹戎巴葛,一名澳大利亚籍男子安德鲁涉嫌在七层楼升降机等候处,高空抛下一支葡萄酒瓶,导致73岁长者身亡,使得高空抛物课题再次成为众人焦点题。 许连碹指出,环境局在2018年,共接获2万6000起乱丢垃圾的投报,及2700起在公共场所处理大型垃圾物件的投诉,当局展开的执法行动分别约3万9000次和30次执法行动。 她在回答义顺集选区议员李美花的询问时指出,当局是在证据确凿后才采取执法行动,而根据案件的复杂程度、提控线索和嫌疑的反应时间,执法过程通常需耗费10周至半年。…

SDP: VERS and HIP II; More snake oil from PAP

Below is a statement by the Singapore Democratic Party in response to…

警方疏散附近大楼人群 阿裕尼工地发现二战炮弹

阿裕尼地铁站附近,位于龙芽60巷的一个建筑工地,发现了一枚未引爆的二战炮弹。 根据建筑公司Trust Build Engineering & Construction 的建设工程安全员工苏巴里(Subari)指出,挖掘机操作员工于昨日(7月23日)早上9时20分发现该枚炮弹。 他指出,新加坡武装部队的军火拆爆组(Explosive Ordnance Disposal team)到现场检验后,证实炮弹不会爆炸。 他说到,已经指示承包商聘请合法的第三方承包商移除炮弹。…