Source: Workers’ Party Facebook

Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) Jamus Lim took to Facebook on Wednesday (2 September) to raise his points on why the opposition are not “free riders”, as labelled by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his opening speech in Parliament on Tuesday.

In his speech, Mr Lee said that Singaporeans voted for the opposition while still expecting the People’s Action Party (PAP) to remain in power. He cited a story told to him by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean, who pointed out that a resident was “perturbed” after her friends told her that it was okay to cast their vote for the opposition because “the Government would still be in charge”.

“If you say vote against the Government because somebody else will look after getting the PAP Government and you just become a free ride, and you vote opposition, no harm, the PAP will still be there, then I think the system must fail,” he said.

He added, “Because the system can only work if people vote sincerely, honestly, in accordance with what they really want, and to produce the result, which matches their true intentions, and if they vote tactically, the consequences must be one day, they will get the result, which they mark the x for, but which they did not intend.”

Responding to this, Leader of the Opposition (LO) Pritam Singh strikes back by saying voters of the opposition are not “free riders”.

“I don’t think the residents of Aljunied, Hougang for 30 years now, and even Sengkang, as a result of the results of the last election, would appreciate being called free riders,” he noted.

He continued, “We are not just doing nothing, having been voted in. We are not just letting the other guy, the government of the day, do something”.

PM Lee then went on to state that while he agrees the importance of having opposition in Parliament, however he noted that it is not right to take advantage of someone who voted for a government.

“But if you say, vote for me, somebody else will vote for the PAP, and therefore the PAP will be the Government, that the economists will call a free rider. It means that you are taking advantage of somebody else who is doing their duty of electing a government for the nation,” Mr Lee said.

MP Jamus Lim responds

Following this exchange by PM Lee and Mr Singh, Mr Lim, who is a MP for Sengkang GRC as well as an economist himself, defined the meaning of free rider, in the context of economics.

“A free rider, as defined in economics, is an individual (or group) that reaps the benefits of the actions of others, without paying the cost (or underpaying for it). It is a form of market failure, and characterizes nonexcludable goods (those whose use cannot be restricted),” he wrote in his post.

While he appreciates points made by PM Lee in his speech as they were “thoughtful, and drew on his deep experience in government”, however Mr Lim said that WP winning in a number of constituencies in GE2020 definitely shows that the party is not a free rider.

“Setting aside the fact that the #workersparty would not have formed government even if it did win every single contested seat (and the PAP would have formed it, assuming no other opposition gains), the free rider claim is worth exploring from an economist’s view,” he said.

He continued, “Parliament seats are excludable: when a PAP MP is elected, the opposition is necessarily prevented from accessing it.”

“Moreover, in Aljunied, Hougang, and Sengkang, the votes were potentially costly: it required trust in our candidates, that we would be good town councilors and MPs. Yet voters were willing to do so. This does not strike me as consistent with free riding.”

If that’s not all, the MP for Sengkang GRC also said that after speaking with voters post-GE2020, he found out that they did not vote for the alternative party hoping that the PAP would still form the government. “If anything, they overcame their fear of the untested, and voted for the WP regardless,” he added.

“What is true is that they voted with their hearts, and with the conviction that some alternative voices were needed. Sure, they did so with some reassurance that the PAP would likely continue to form government. But it certainly wasn’t because they were looking for a free ride,” Mr Lim concluded.

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like


为逮捕在禁烟区抽烟的嫌犯,环境局出动多种监视行动,甚至大阵仗在组屋附近部署热感摄像机(thermal camera),最终成功确认嫌犯身份,致函要求对方协助调查。 据《今日报》报导指出,环境局自今年2月起就陆续受到来自勿洛组屋居民的投诉,多达13封投诉信函中纷纷指出,有人在该组屋的公共走廊-禁烟区抽烟。因此居民们致函,促请该局彻查。 环境局针对有关投诉采取多轮监视行动,包括采用热感摄像机。其发言人在一份声明中指出,透过部署热感摄像机,他们看到一名人士在有关走廊抽烟,次数多达12次。 因此该局于本月6日致函相关人士,即承租在勿洛蓄水池路,第620座组屋单位的嫌犯,要求他到该局协助展开调查。 信件中也表明已经获得录像信息,显示“有人在禁烟区的走廊抽烟”、“并且从该单位出入”,甚至还列明了发生在4月11日至14日的时段。 当局提醒人们,吸烟者不应该在禁烟区抽烟,而组屋底层、走廊和电梯都属于禁烟区,并表示会继续对付违例者。 凡是在禁烟区吸烟者,将会被罚款200元,而一旦被法庭定罪,则可能被罚款不超过1000元。 在禁烟区部署多达70次 环境局自今年开始,已经采取热感摄像机在加强监督执法行为,并且部署在包括住宅区、禁烟区和其他“投报旺区”多达70次。 热感摄像机可检测释放出高温的物体,捕捉吸烟的图像。 而为了确保不侵犯到居民和公众的隐私,当局也设立严格规定,包括仅有授权的环境局人员和供应商可查看并处理录像视频。有关的录像视频,也只用于官方用途,而没有违规的录像视频,将在三个月后被摧毁。…

Regulations will not solve the problem of distrust

~ By Shermon Ong ~ Recently, there has been much debate over the…

Takashimaya and Ngee Ann Development in dispute over rent

The landlord of Ngee Ann City and its anchor tenant, department store…


贸工部长陈振声认为,分享数据不是解决所有政策课题的“万灵药”,能赢得人民信任且确保数据获得客观分析也很重要。 然而,他又期望在挑战和政策议题上,能和国人有更深入的讨论。 李光耀公共政策学院政策研究所,于昨日举办2020年度新加坡透视论坛。陈振声在对话会上回答与会者提问时,这么表示。 当时人民力量党秘书长吴明盛在会上提出,政府应提供更多数据,以促进更有建设性的政策辩论。 他指出,如果对数据有先入为主的看法,就可能以特定的角度诠释之。 此前陈振声与工人党议员毕丹星,针对国内PMET就业课题在国会交锋。他以此为例,永久公民的就业数据看起来较好,结果有者就指“政府不关心公民”,或者偏好永久居民等。 指民主党对人力部数据“断章取义” 此外,民主党也被点名,该党此前被人力部发出指示要求更正网络贴文。陈振声指出,尽管都有提供数据,但被“断章取义”(truncated)。 他认为,有数据是好事,但也必须客观地看待,“如果人们都不相信你,你给再多的数据也无法赢得民心。” 此外,他也列举出对新加坡政治体系的三大愿望,其中之一就是希望对于国家挑战和政策议题,能和国人有更深层次的讨论。其二是希望新加坡人需对外部局势能更加了解,以及维持为下一代着想做决策的精神。