Social media influencer Preetipls revealed that her Instagram post, alleging “abuse of power” by radio DJ Dee Kosh, had been removed by the platform for “hate speech”. 

On Friday (21 Aug), Preetipls, whose real name is Preeti Nair, tweeted a screenshot of Instagram removing her post. 

The official reason stated was the post “goes against community guidelines for hate speech and symbols”

At time of writing, the post has not been re-uploaded. 

However, the accusations against Kosh is still up on her Facebook page which she uploaded on Wednesday (19 Aug). 

 

When her post was removed, Preeti then questioned why Instagram had not previously removed Xiaxue’s post where she allegedly “body-shamed” her. 

Preetipls accuses Dee Kosh of abusing his power to intimidate her and her brother Subhas Nair

Preeti accused the DJ on Wednesday (19 Aug) of intimidating her and her brother Subhas Nair in an incident two years ago.

She alleged that Mr Kosh’s alleged abuse of power against her and Mr Subhas took place in December 2018 after Mr Subhas criticised a video made by Mr Kosh.

“It is him singing an “Indian version” of an English song and by that I mean yet again making a mockery of the Indian accent in the name of bad comedy,” she wrote.

Mr Subhas, in an Instagram story, said that Mr Kosh’s video was “not funny” and questioned why the latter continues to pander to “Chinese people” using “racist caricatures”.

“Do you just want to lend your voice and platform to verbalize the shit they cannot say? Do you hate your Indian-ness that much? You can do better,” he added, referring to Mr Kosh’s Malayalee ancestry. Mr Kosh is of Chinese-Indian parentage.

Highlighting that Mr Subhas’ remarks were not in any way related to her, Ms Preeti said that Mr Kosh had then posted an Instagram story with a picture of them together “as an indirect retort insinuating that my brother having an opinion would lead to the tarnishing of my career”.

“Subhas took to Instagram again to let DK know that I should not be dragged into this and also to reiterate his initial thoughts on video #1,” she added.

Ms Preeti said that she had also communicated to Mr Kosh her discomfort with the situation through a WhatsApp conversation.

In a screenshot of the conversation posted by Ms Preeti, Mr Kosh can purportedly be seen threatening to “destroy” Mr Subhas and that Ms Preeti will “sadly” become “collateral damage if that happens”.

He had also allegedly said that he was only willing to take down the Instagram story with a photograph of Ms Preeti for her “alone”.

“If this was not an abuse of power I’m not sure what is. and remember, this is all because my brother thought his stupid video was done in bad taste,” said Ms Preeti.

She alleged that from the point of the incident onwards, Mr Kosh “has gone the extra mile” to mention her and Mr Subhas in an attempt to destroy their careers.

“It has almost been 2 years since this incident and even up til today he continues to take potshots against me. He even launched his podcast with the debut episode attacking me and IRONICALLY using Eden Ang as clickbait for streams.

“Remember his 4 part video series about the brown face incident? Well take a look at the hypocrite’s portrayal of Indian and Muslim women in his own content. This man is vile and disgusting and has been a bully for way too long,” said Ms Preeti.

Police investigating multiple police reports filed against Dee Koh over alleged sexual harassment 

Police confirmed last week that they are investigating Mr Kosh after several police reports were lodged against him for alleged sexual harassment of teenage boys.

Several of the alleged victims shared screenshots on social media over the weekend, in which Mr Kosh could be seen asking them for nude photographs and sexual favours.

Mr Kosh, whose real name is Darryl Ian Koshy, said on Saturday that he would be “taking the necessary steps to clear this all up”.

However, a few days later, Mr Kosh shared a post on his social media accounts, admitting that “there is truth to some of the things which are being said now”.

Despite that, he maintained that some of the allegations baffled him “because they were baseless and untrue”.

“(E)ven though I had put out on an earlier statement on Instastories denying allegations which had surfaced initially, I now admit that there is truth to some of the things which are being said now, and I am sorry to the people I have hurt in the process,” Mr Kosh said.

He also mentioned the circulated screenshot of him texting with a 15-year-old boy that he now accepts is “problematic”.

“My tone was questionable, but there was absolutely no intent to groom him,” he clarified, adding that he “did not ever have any sexual relations with him or any minor”.

The YouTuber, who has more than 380k subscribers on his channel, also rebutted the allegations of him looking for paid sex on dating apps and using his talent management business “as a platform for anything else apart from working with all our clients for content creation and entertainment”.

Alleged victims speak out

The first accusation emerged online when an Instagram user @_epaul shared a post on Saturday (15 Aug) claiming Mr Kosh had sexually harassed him under the “guise of recruiting me for his channel and tried to cover his dirty tracks”.

The post, however, has been removed from his account.

The next day, @_epaul uploaded a lawyer’s letter from DC Law firm which demanded him to “immediately cease and desist” from publishing the offending content about Mr Kosh.

Following his disclosure, several people also stepped forward on social media to share their similar encounters, some of whom had shown screenshots of text conversations between them and Mr Kosh.

The screenshots, shared by another Instagram user @sxmuel.l, showed that a Telegram user with the name ‘deekosh’ offered “1k” and asked @sxmuel.l to come over his house without giving a specific reason for doing so.

A Twitter user @DisparateFool recounted his experience of being harassed by Mr Kosh, while expressing that he felt disturbing on how persistent and manipulative of Dee Kosh in emphasising “how the arrangement must involve sex”.

More recently, author Eliza Teoh also took to her Facebook page yesterday to denounce Mr Kosh’s “verbal harassment” against her and influencer Nicole Choo several years ago.

According to Ms Teoh, Mr Kosh had posted a video online, mocking Ms Choo’s work and looks, after Ms Choo’s book “Nineteen” made it to The Straits Times’ Bestselling List.

“The whole horrible saga started with him posting a YouTube video reading out her work and mocking her looks, her work, degrading her as a person.

“Nicole was only 19 then. He was 30. To this day, I don’t know why he, together with another grown man called Hirzi [a Singaporean comedian and YouTube personality of MunahHirzi fame], would dress up as women and mock a teenage girl, using sexual slurs, just for having the audacity to launch a book,” she wrote.

Initially, Ms Teoh assumed that it was triggered “by the fact that Nicole had achieved some level of success which they felt was not deserved”.

However, she later found out that Dee Kosh “had been obsessively mocking her since she was 15”.

Expressing her thoughts on this saga, she noted: “Whether the accusations are true, only time will tell. All I can say now is that there is a clear pattern of his predatory behaviour towards young girls and boys.”

Lawyer no longer representing Dee Kosh; Dee Kosh on leave from work

Responding to the letter sent to the alleged victim, lawyer Fong Wei Li said he was “unable to comment because we no longer act for Dee Kosh,” as reported in Yahoo News.

The radio station, Power 98 FM – where Mr Kosh works as a part-time DJ – also issued a statement on Monday, noting that he is currently on leave” and that the radio station “does not tolerate any form of harassment”.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】刘韦伶:牵连甚广 无家可归为迫切民生课题

刘韦伶指出,无家可归并非只是失业者的课题,其中也包括没屋遮顶的低薪阶层以及面对租赁问题的居民,她认为这都是迫切需要探讨和解决的民生课题,并提出了数项解决方案。 前进党丹戎巴葛候选人刘韦伶今早(7月8日)在脸书帖文指出,她昨日(7日)和媒体在互动时,提到有关无家可归的课题,以及可以采取的解决方案。 建屋局限制及合租问题 帖文中,她指出,除了失业者,低收入群亦面对无家可归的困境,如清洁工人与保安人员。“他们无可奈何得露宿街头的其中几个主要因素,如想在靠近工作地点租房子,却发现并不便宜;过了午夜时分无法使用公共交通工具及必须在隔天早些时候开始轮班工作。” 她表示,生活工资的定义需要重新探讨,逐步落实具体建议,并为这些底薪群体制定更人道的工作时间,才有希望改善他们的情况。 此外,她认为建屋局对租赁组屋申请者所设下的限制条例,如申请者等待时段、种族固定配额等,以及联合单身计划中同居租户问题,也是导致无家可归的原因。 刘韦伶指出,我国政府朝向房产权国家发展,因此较不支持增加租赁组屋的供应(新加坡公众租赁组屋–不得已的居家抉择,第八页,李光耀政策学院,新加坡国立大学)。 就联合单身计划方便,她披露,有者是因为搭配上不合适的租户而引发冲突,包括需要照顾有肢体或精神残疾的租户,最后选择露宿街头。 租赁房屋欠缺及家庭收入问题 她也就目前受冠状病毒19疫情影响而选择售屋的情况指出,售屋者在当局的规定下,售屋后30个月才能申请入住租赁租屋。 而若家庭总收入被评定有所增加,即表示他们必须缴付更高的租金。同时,有居民指出,租金也可能随着政府批准的家庭每月总收入门槛,即1500元而提高。 因此,她认为增加租赁房屋的供应,缩短等后期,并慎重考虑个人隐私空间,把家庭“总”收入改为净收入正在制定标准,才能更好得解决问题。…

遭骇客侵入向学生展示不雅照 教育部勒令暂停使用ZOOM

有学生在家使用ZOOM平台上网连线学习,却遭骇客入侵向全班学生展示色情照,甚至要求女学生露胸,致使教育部立即勒令暂停使用ZOOM教学。 事实上通讯软件ZOOM在国外也曾传出个资安全隐忧。教育部称这是“非常严重事件”,并指已调查此事。 事缘早前一名家长在脸书发文,指女儿在家学习,当全班人都用ZOOM学习时,系统却遭骇,还被展示不雅图片,还要学生露胸。教育部表示严正看待这起网络安全疏漏,也正与ZOOM合作加强系统保安设置。 不过为了保险起见,目前教师已暂停使用ZOOM直至网安问题解决为止。 据了解,我国多个政府机构也同样使用ZOOM平台进行记者会和会议,不过内部远程会议和讨论则使用特定安全管道。

Rising Medical Costs a Big Worry for our Elderly Citizens

By Raymond Anthony Fernando – Workers Party Member of Parliament, Gerald Giam…

英殖民时期人民水深火热 纪念莱佛士登陆形同歌颂压迫者

德国媒体《德国之声中文网》于昨日刊载一则文章,报导新加坡庆祝开埠200周年,纪念莱佛士登陆。不过,形同“歌颂压迫者”的官方纪念活动值得商权,因为历史纪录显示,英殖民实际造成本土社群受压迫。批判者认为,殖民者的动机就是获得利益,即便其他前英殖民地国家,都在批判殖民者,只有新加坡从未表态。 这篇题为《莱佛士登陆200年:新加坡殖民史思辨》的文章,由《德国之声》特派员Sonia Sarkar撰文。文内指官方今年一整年会举办一系列活动,如、历史巡游之旅、灯光装置艺术以及歌舞表演,但批判者对纪念英国殖民者的做法感到不满。 根据官方论述,英殖民时期政治家莱佛士(Sir Thomas Stamford Bingley Raffles)登陆新加坡,改变了这片土地的历史,使之从“不起眼渔村,摇身一变成为重要港口及现代化大都市”。 1819年至1923年间,莱佛士前后共造访新加坡三次,但总停留时间仅10个月。在英殖民统治下,新加坡成为英国在亚洲贸易的重要枢纽。 不过,并非所有新加坡人,都乐见一名英国殖民者如此受到爱戴和追捧。 其中25岁的新加坡国立大学马来研究所研究生麦萨拉,认为开埠200年庆祝活动,实际上是纪念殖民者及殖民主义,实际上就是在歌颂压迫者,这是非常值得商榷的。 #SingaporeBicentennial…