President Halimah Yacob has via a Facebook post said that discrimination against anyone has “no place at all in Singapore society.

She went on to say that “people should be assessed solely on their merits and their ability to do a job and nothing else.” While her statements ring true at face value, how do they stack up with Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat’s statements last year when he said that older Singaporeans were not ready for a non Chinese Prime Minister?

Heng’s statements implied that no matter how good a politician is, he or she can never be prime minister because of the colour of his or her skin. In other words, skin colour trumps ability in the most powerful political office in the land. Not only is this racist, it runs contrary to the entirety of what Yacob is saying.

No matter what Yacob says, her statements cannot really have any impact until and unless Heng’s comments have been explained and accounted for because they are diametrically opposed. Until we address the top establishment’s view points on who can hold power in Singapore, Yocob’s words will ring hollow.

After all, how can she say that discrimination has no place in Singapore when the man that is touted by many to be the future prime minister publicly implies  (without empirical data) that a non Chinese person cannot aspire to be Prime Minister?

Besides, what about the police reports hanging over Workers’ Party member of parliament, Raeesah Khan? In police reports that have not yet been dismissed, it has been alleged that Khan, a minority has been racist towards the overwhelmingly dominant Chinese community over Facebook posts she made in the past. A common sense reading of her social media posts indicate a passionate crusader for equality. Yet, the powers be have branded her a racist?

By seemingly taking to task a minority fighting for equality for being racist against the majority race in Singapore, could the authorities be seen to be discriminatory? How do the pending police reports gel with Yacob’s plea to end discrimination?

As the sitting president, what are Yacob’s views on the words of Heng and the pending police reports against Khan? If Yacob genuinely wants to promote anti discrimination, shouldn’t she publicly condemn Heng’s words from last year? Should she also not issue a statement in relation to Khan’s pending police reports?

Is Yacob only paying lip service to anti discrimination?

 

Subscribe
Notify of
62 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陈川仁转发视频 呼吁国人”保持警惕、坚定、团结“

国会议长陈川仁针对近期的新马海域争议,呼吁国人保持警惕、坚定立场和团结,并认为新马之间的对立”可能会持续一段时间,大家加油”。 陈川仁在上周五(7日),在个人脸书分享了一段两分钟半、有关新马海域争议的视频,呼吁国人了解此课题。 视频中提到新马之间的海域界限、实里达机场管理权和新马水供课题。 视频称,马国已超越自己在1979年单边划出的领海范围、14艘马国船只入侵我国领海;实里达机场的ILS系统不会影响巴西古当发展;以及在水供课题方面,马方已在1987年放弃检讨水价的权利。 视频吁国人“作长期抗争心理准备” 视频也质疑马方借近期课题转移内部焦点,或对我国新领导层施压。 视频最后呼吁“从容以对,见招拆招”,“力挺武装部队和内政群英”,并做好“长期抗争的心理准备”。 在帖文中,陈川仁呼吁国人继续为武装部队和内政团队祈祷,因为在海上进行近距离的行动,对双方来说都是非常危险的。 “所以对方必须离开属于我们的领海。你不能跨过自己所划分的界限,然后做出不正确的声明。” “有些人说,双方应该坐下来好好谈判,但请记得,一直以来我们都这么做,可惜成效不大。但我们还在尽力。” 陈川仁也坚称,如果对方跨过了自己较早前宣称的界限,那很显然的就是违反条例。”同时,这些年来两国之间的领空交通管理权也没有更动,没有人想挑战他人的男子气概或主权。” “如果你选择相信对方的说辞,随你意。但是不要以谨慎和平衡的名义自我掩饰。”…

Chee speaks in Yale-NUS – The Future of One-Party Rule in Singapore

This op-ed is written by Sherlyn (S) and Wei Jie (WJ), two…

S’porean boss arrested in Thailand for recklessly driving his Porsche knocking down Thai policeman

Thai media The Nation reported that a Singaporean businessman, Simon Ong Chin…