An Indian Muslim restaurant, 7Star Restaurant, located at Upper Serangoon Road was fined $52,000 by the court yesterday (20 Aug), after pleading guilty to four charges relating to falsely declaring the salaries of four employees to Manpower Ministry (MOM).

Eight other charges, also involving the salaries of other employees, were taken into consideration during sentencing. They all involved inflating the salaries of foreign employees in order to deceive MOM into issuing work passes for them.

The offences took place between 2013 and 2017. The 4 charges involved:

  • Jun 2013 – one S Pass holder declared to be earning $3,000 when he was getting less than half
  • Sep 2014 – Renewing S Pass with declared salary of $2,900 when the person actually earned $1,400
  • Mar 2015 – Renewing Employment Pass with declared salary of $4,500 when the person actually earned $1,400
  • Feb 2017 – one S Pass holder declared to be earning $3,150 when he was getting less than half

The minimum salaries to qualify for getting S Pass and Employment Pass are $2,400 and $3,900 respectively.

MOM prosecutor told the court that its director, Mr Subramanian Thiruppathi Raj, knew about the minimum salary requirement for obtaining work passes and that he never had the intention to pay his foreign employees the declared salaries.

Mr Raj would pay his “foreign talents” through cheques reflecting the false salaries every month. They then colluded with him to return the difference between the false amounts and their actual salaries in cash back to him.

Mr Raj also instructed them to sign on salary vouchers reflecting the false salaries, which were intended to give the authorities the impression that they were paid such amounts.

With regard to the $52,000 fine, Mr Raj instructed his lawyer to inform the court that his company has already ceased operations and has no money to pay the fine.

The District Judge eventually ordered the company to pay $13,000 upfront, with the rest of the fine to be paid in instalments over three months.

In any case, it took 7 years for MOM to uncover the ruse first pulled off by the restaurant in 2013.

Subscribe
Notify of
35 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Experts suggest to switch off air-conditioners and get fresh air to reduce coronavirus infection risk

Apart from washing hands and disinfecting surfaces, experts also suggested that people…

Travellers are advised to plan their journey if they are travelling via Woodlands Checkpoint on Thursday

Travellers are advised to plan their journey if they are travelling via Woodlands…

MOH: We only accept COVID-19 test results from labs recognised by Indian govt

The Health Ministry (MOH) said that travellers coming from India must produce…

马籍精神障碍毒骡维持死刑原判,人权律师疾呼违国际法将申诉

即便曾遭医师判断有精神疾病和智力障碍,最高法院上诉庭今日仍维持30岁马来西亚籍毒骡的死刑原判。 今日,人权律师M·拉維于个人脸书揭露,马籍毒品走私者纳嘉(Nagaenthran s/o K Dharmalingam)以精神异常为由入禀法庭,申请免除死刑处决,但却遭驳回。 “根据囚犯的精神科医师表示,纳嘉患有精神疾病或智能障碍,若能以此说服法庭,他可能无需遭处决。”拉維说道。 他续指,“只可惜,法庭选择相信心理卫生学院(IMH)的精神科医师,判定纳嘉的精神状况并无异常。然而,检方与最高法院均认为他仅患有轻度智能障碍。” 他引述了英国人权组织Reprieve,针对处决精神疾患者或智能障碍者的观点,指不论国际法或一些国家的法律,已禁止处死精神疾患者或智能障碍者。 他也指出,在纳嘉的上诉中,来自公家机关的医疗专家证供并未作出进一步的独立检查,而是仅透过囚犯的精神科医师提供的意见,作出观察。 他强调,类似的做法就如同在裁決上鑽漏洞,是一桩无法接受的刑事审判,而最高法院的裁决亦违反国际法规准则的公平审判权。 因此,拉维表示他也打算草拟备忘录提呈马来西亚政府,基于违反国际法,以及纳嘉个案中违反公平审讯的其他事项,呼吁该国政府向国际法庭申诉。 新加坡反对死刑运动…